mata say paikia darren ng death due to gang related, not staring incident

[Ramseth]

Mr Ramseth, given the background of the assailants, the arrests made, the kids involved, YES, they have taken too long to establish facts of case. We do not have a 3rd world police force, remember?

Once again, you're entitled to your perspective, reflection and expectation.

Btw, you have not answered my question - In your view, is our police and other agencies competent enough to handle the aftermath of a REAL terrorist attack when this DTE case exposes their inadequacies?

No, there's no defence against people willing to die. The best probable (not certain) defence is to change their minds.

 

[jw5]

If this is really a gang related killing and not a staring incident, you may feel less sympathy for the victim.

But there's no reason to feel less outrage at the killers. And the severity of their punishment should not be lower, in fact, it should probably be higher.

 

[GoldenDragon]

No, there's no defence against people willing to die. The best probable (not certain) defence is to change their minds.

Mr Ramseth, for the 3rd time you are avoiding a very simple question. I have no idea why you are avoiding it. You are an intelligent chap and surely you understand the question.

IN YOUR OPINION, IS OUR POLICE AND OTHER RELATED AGENCIES COMPETENT TO HANDLE A REAL TERRORIST ATTACK GIVEN THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE PROBLEMS WITH KIDS AT DTE?

I acknowledge the socio-political factors involved etc. I too acknowledge that there is no defence against people willing to die etc - all your answers to my question.

Trust me, should you 'siam' the question again, I won't be asking you in future. But it is very strange, given your expertise and being an ex-AIO as you claimed, you avoided this straightforward question.

 

[Ramseth]

Mr Ramseth, for the 3rd time you are avoiding a very simple question. I have no idea why you are avoiding it. You are an intelligent chap and surely you understand the question.

Avoid what? Can't you read the simple and unambiguous N O, no. The rest is just a summary of why I believe it's a no. You can skip it if you're interested in yes or no without reasoning. For your benefit, just in case you're confused again, my answer has been and still is...

No.

 

[GoldenDragon]

Avoid what? Can't you read the simple and unambiguous N O, no. The rest is just a summary of why I believe it's a no. You can skip it if you're interested in yes or no without reasoning. For your benefit, just in case you're confused again, my answer has been and still is...

No.

Bro, relax lah. I am an old man having eyesight problem. Strange, this is the first time I read a NO as your answer. Finally, I got an answer from you. Whatever your answer, I am just curious. And the more you "siam" the more curious I got. Cheers.

 

[Ramseth]

Bro, relax lah. I am an old man having eyesight problem. Strange, this is the first time I read a NO as your answer. Finally, I got an answer from you. Whatever your answer, I am just curious. And the more you "siam" the more curious I got. Cheers.

Don't worry about it. Saying no when it has to be a no is not a problem for me. However, this is not cross examination in court and I'm not a witness on the dock. This is a forum. We discuss. Trying to corner people into being on the defensive for the sake of defending indefensible causes doesn't work on me. Cheers.

 

[GoldenDragon]

Don't worry about it. Saying no when it has to be a no is not a problem for me. However, this is not cross examination in court and I'm not a witness on the dock. This is a forum. We discuss. Trying to corner people into being on the defensive for the sake of defending indefensible causes doesn't work on me. Cheers.

Mr Ramseth, I am not a lawyer lah. How to cross examine you? Neither was it my intention to corner you. I was merely soliciting your learned views, period. You should take it as a compliment. Cheers.

 

[Ramseth]

Mr Ramseth, I am not a lawyer lah. How to cross examine you? Neither was it my intention to corner you. I was merely soliciting your learned views, period. You should take it as a compliment. Cheers.

Compliment accepted. Thanks.

 

[streetsmart73]

Don't worry about it. Saying no when it has to be a no is not a problem for me. However, this is not cross examination in court and I'm not a witness on the dock. This is a forum. We discuss. Trying to corner people into being on the defensive for the sake of defending indefensible causes doesn't work on me. Cheers.

hi there

1. ram, bingo!
2. five thumbs up.