- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 2,545
- Points
- 63
MAS claims that as Sinkapore's financial regulator, it places utmost importance on its integrity. ["MAS files police report against author of defamatory article relating to 1MDB", https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...bellous-singapore-high-commission-in-malaysia]
If that's the case, why hasn't it charged Pinky's buddy for having abused Sinkie banks to launder hundreds of millions of US dollars?
When the world's worst kleptocrat was in power, CNA (Chief Natural Aristocrat) was in a dilemma to charge him for money laundering activities without incurring the wrath of UMNO and its supporters.
Now that Najib Razak is no longer UMNO's president and just a politician in the opposition party of Malaysia, it's puzzling why MAS has not brought charges against him.
Najib Razak claims that he is a victim of a political witchhunt launched by the current Mahathir administration. As a result, he will never be given a fair and just trial in Malaysia, he alleges. Therefore it is reasonable to assume countries other than Malaysian can give him justice. So, what is holding MAS back?
Some relevant info:
The Saudi foreign minister, during an official visit to Malaysia in October of this year, confirmed that the funds that Najib received via Sinkie banks were not donations from the Saudi government. ["Malaysian ex-PM Najib and Saudi Foreign Minister backtrack on source of funds", https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/s...foreign-minister-backtrack-on-source-of-funds]
Two years ago, the US Department of Justice, having conducted its own investigations, confirmed that Najib had received a portion of the stolen 1MDB funds through a Sinkie bank account held in the name of Tanore Finance Corporation, the latter controlled by Eric Tan Kim Loong, a close buddy of Jho Low. ["Justice Dept. Rejects Account of How Malaysia’s Leader Acquired Millions, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/world/asia/malaysia-1mdb-najib-razak.html]
If that's the case, why hasn't it charged Pinky's buddy for having abused Sinkie banks to launder hundreds of millions of US dollars?
When the world's worst kleptocrat was in power, CNA (Chief Natural Aristocrat) was in a dilemma to charge him for money laundering activities without incurring the wrath of UMNO and its supporters.
Now that Najib Razak is no longer UMNO's president and just a politician in the opposition party of Malaysia, it's puzzling why MAS has not brought charges against him.
Najib Razak claims that he is a victim of a political witchhunt launched by the current Mahathir administration. As a result, he will never be given a fair and just trial in Malaysia, he alleges. Therefore it is reasonable to assume countries other than Malaysian can give him justice. So, what is holding MAS back?
Some relevant info:
The Saudi foreign minister, during an official visit to Malaysia in October of this year, confirmed that the funds that Najib received via Sinkie banks were not donations from the Saudi government. ["Malaysian ex-PM Najib and Saudi Foreign Minister backtrack on source of funds", https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/s...foreign-minister-backtrack-on-source-of-funds]
Two years ago, the US Department of Justice, having conducted its own investigations, confirmed that Najib had received a portion of the stolen 1MDB funds through a Sinkie bank account held in the name of Tanore Finance Corporation, the latter controlled by Eric Tan Kim Loong, a close buddy of Jho Low. ["Justice Dept. Rejects Account of How Malaysia’s Leader Acquired Millions, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/23/world/asia/malaysia-1mdb-najib-razak.html]
