• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save them.

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 23, 2012
Messages
5,424
Points
0
SINGAPORE: Singaporean banks are not at risk, the city-state's central bank said Tuesday after credit rating agency Moody's downgraded its outlook on local lenders to "negative".

The three home-grown banks have the highest average credit ratings among banking systems worldwide and hold adequate capital to weather financial stresses, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said.

It was reacting to an announcement by Moody's on Monday lowering its outlook for Singapore's three main banks to "negative" from "stable".

Moody's cited mounting domestic household debt and rising property prices in Singapore and in countries where the three banks are active.

It said these "have increased the probability of deterioration in the banks' credit profiles under potential adverse conditions in the future".

MAS said that while some borrowers are at risk, especially when interest rates rise as a result of a tightening of US monetary policy, "the local banks are not at risk".

"They undertake regular stress tests on their own as well as coordinated by the MAS, and have adequate buffers in place to cope with the inevitable upturn in the interest rate cycle," it added.

"The local banks continue to have strong financial positions by any serious assessment. As Moody's itself concluded, the local banks have enough capital to withstand even the severe stress test scenarios that it considered," Singapore's central bank said.

The three local banks -- DBS, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp and United Overseas Bank -- maintain capital levels well above the threshold required under new global banking rules known as Basel III, MAS said.

Moody's pointed to a tightening of US monetary policy as a "potential trigger" for Singapore and neighbouring countries also to raise interest rates, which would affect borrowers' ability to repay their loans.

Markets are closely watching testimony by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke at the US Congress on Wednesday and Thurday for clues on monetary policy.

MAS said it has been monitoring the financial system closely, noting that it and other government agencies have also introduced pre-emptive measures against risks in the property market.
 
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

So , are those drug lords and corrupt politicians from neighbouring countries withdrawing their ill-gotten gains from local banks ? :eek: :eek:
 
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

It is just like they say Temasek and GIC are the world's best sovereign funds.
 
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

So , are those drug lords and corrupt politicians from neighbouring countries withdrawing their ill-gotten gains from local banks ? :eek: :eek:

Precisely .....these evil bastards are not moving their monies so the ultimate stress test has been passed with flyin colours for the MAS. Thats why they can afford to go and tell those Moody's clowns to fuck off....


Anyways these rating agencies are also a bunch of bastards but wait till all of them get together on the same bandwagon and start stirring shit...it will be fireworks man.....
 
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

MAS should sue Moody's. Otherwise it means Moody's telling the truth.

Things must be so desperate that the bulldog-face minister has to pay a visit to South America.
 
Last edited:
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

Moody is notorious for their grading.

Moody's gave Freddie Mac's preferred stock an investment grade rating of A1 until August 22, 2008
 
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

It's not about who say what, Both MAS and Moody should show facts and figures to substantiate each others claims.

Moody is notorious for their grading.

Moody's gave Freddie Mac's preferred stock an investment grade rating of A1 until August 22, 2008
 
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

MAS should sue Moody's. Otherwise it means Moody's telling the truth......

Agree, as this is the standard set by the old man himself.
This is a much more serious accusation than the cleaning of 2 hawker centre roofs .
The highest paid ministers in the world must protect our reputation as a "world class " financial centre.
DBS which was tainted by the same brush should join in too.
There is no parliamentary immunity here.
It should also show the same confidence as Abu Dhabi by filing the suit in the US-in this case New York.

The Wall Street Journal
...April 26, 2013,....
.S&P, Moody's Settle Ratings Lawsuit ....

The two major credit-rating firms settled a highly anticipated lawsuit on Friday...., avoiding .. trial over crisis-era ratings.

Fourteen plaintiffs, led by Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and King County, Washington, settled with Standard & Poor's.... and Moody's Investors Service, ....

...investors claimed in lawsuits filed in 2008 and 2009 that the defendants misled them by allegedly inflating ratings on two so-called structured investment vehicles they purchased—known as Cheyne and Rhinebridge........

Friday's agreement is particularly significant for S&P as..... unit is confronting a slew of lawsuits.

The Justice Department sued S&P for fraud on Feb. 4, claiming the company triggered billions of dollars in losses for federally insured banks and credit unions by allegedly misrepresenting its ratings as independent and objective before the financial crisis. Eighteen state attorneys general have also sued S&P, claiming the firm violated state consumer-protection laws by allegedly putting its desire for profits over analytical quality.....

The Abu Dhabi case was a high-stakes trial for S&P in particular, lawyers have said. A guilty verdict by a jury could have weakened some of the company's legal arguments in its battle with state and federal prosecutors.

Also, the trial would have been a public airing of many of the same issues at the heart of the Justice Department's lawsuit—the allegedly shoddy ratings the company issued in a bid to drum up business in the years before the financial crisis...........
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323789704578447561293487032.html
 
Last edited:
Re: MAS tell Moody off!! Our banks are not at risks. We will do what's necc to save t

They must question MOODY on their Integrity & tell them to come clean...
 
Back
Top