- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 1,107
- Points
- 48
I do believe housing as a component of CPI and even property tax are computed on a rental value basis. Property price is a separate thing. For example, you bought a property at $500k. It appreciated to $1m 5 years later. That's not inflation for you, that's asset price appreciation for you. You've already owned it at $500k. If you missed buying it 5 years ago at $500k, you have to pay $1m for it if you want it now. That's also not inflation. That's still asset price appreciation except you're on the wrong side of it. If you count this as inflation, car prices and share prices would also have to be counted. CPI would be gyrating in 20 to 30% band annually.
Your logic only applies if you own at least part of the land that your building sits on. For most HDB-pigeonhole owners, there is this so called "asset appreciation" because the bloody government has been linking their prices to private property. The cycle then goes on as the HDB prices in turn prop up the private property prices. The government is the biggest beneficiary of this policy. It is now a tiger that they cannot dismount from. That is why they have to keep selling the koyok that HDB prices are affordable to keep the peasants pacified. Just for this policy alone, if the peasants ever realise the truth, every single PAP member would be dragged away and hanged by the mob.