• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Married Male MOE Teacher Turns Out To Be A Serial Faggot Pedophile! Even Kena Blackmailed $50 By His Own Student!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE: A 36-year-old teacher was jailed for six years and six months on Monday (Apr 22) for sex acts he committed with three students at his home, and for molesting a fourth in school.

The teacher, who cannot be named in order to protect the identities of the four boys aged between 13 and 15 at the time, worked at a school in northern Singapore, the court heard.

The subject he taught was also redacted from court documents.

The married man, who was diagnosed with paedophilia after his arrest, preyed on the boys between 2016 and 2017, until one of them lodged a police report.

He began with a 14-year-old boy in May 2016, who had been sent for detention over using his phone to circulate pornographic photos in his class's WhatsApp group.

When the teacher found out the reason for his detention, he asked the younger boy if he wanted to watch pornography together with him.


The teenager refused at first, but eventually agreed after the teacher said he would not tell anyone about it. The boy in turn asked for S$50 not to tell anyone about the invitation, and the older man agreed.

The next day, the teenager went to the teacher's maisonette flat, where they watched porn together in the man's bedroom.

The teacher performed a sex act on the teenager, before giving him the money.

They continued to meet after this up to August 2017, with the teenager asking for sums of money ranging from S$50 to S$300 before he went over to the flat.

TEACHER TOOK BOY HOME TO "PLAY GAMES"

Shortly after he began meeting this boy, the teacher turned his attentions to a younger student.

He spotted the 13-year-old in a corridor of the school in July 2016 and asked the boy to go to his home to play games with him.

Although the boy initially said he would consider it, he later agreed when the teacher approached him after school.

They went to the teacher's flat, where they played on a Wii console in his bedroom.

During the game, the teacher placed the boy in his lap and moved against him. The boy felt uncomfortable and stood up.

In July 2017, the teacher began focusing his attention on another boy, who was 15. Although he had not taught this boy, he managed to get his mobile number and texted him, asking to meet after school.

He took a taxi with the boy to his maisonette, where he made the boy perform a sex act on him and reciprocated. They met again on at least two other occasions.

His offences came to light a month later, when he targeted another 13-year-old student.

FRIGHTENED BOY REJECTS ADVANCES REPEATEDLY

The boy had gone to a computer lab for a lesson with the teacher on the morning of Aug 29.

He stayed behind as he had had trouble logging into his computer and was eventually the last person left in the room with the teacher.

After finishing his work, the boy balanced his laptop on his arms and walked towards the door. The teacher asked if he wanted to go to his house, but the boy refused and continued walking.

He then felt the teacher poke him five times in the buttocks with his finger.

Feeling scared and not daring to ask his teacher why he had done that, the boy asked the older man to help open the door for him, before quickly leaving to join his classmates in another room.

The teacher gave a lesson to the class, dismissing them at the end but asking the boy to stay behind. He asked the boy once more if he wanted to go to his house, but the boy refused and quickly left the room.

The paedophile persisted and asked the boy to go to the back gate of the school with him after classes had ended for the day.

The boy asked him why he wanted him to go there, but the teacher refused to answer, later asking him instead to wait at the bus stop so they could go to the teacher's house together.

Feeling scared, the boy left hurriedly on a bus to his own home. While on the bus, he received messages from an unknown number that he found out from a classmate belonged to the teacher.

The boy later passed information about what happened to his form teacher, who told his parents, who took their son to lodge a police report.

The teacher later admitted that he had invited the boy to his home as he wanted to touch him and possibly engage in a sex act with him.

He was arrested and the crimes he committed on the other three victims came to light.

DIAGNOSED PAEDOPHILE WILL NEVER TEACH AGAIN: DEFENCE

An Institute of Mental Health report said the teacher was a diagnosed paedophile, characterised by his recurrent sexual preference for children in early puberty, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Amanda Han.

"It further stated that he has a moderate risk of re-offending, especially if he is in a position of authority over children," she said.

In response, the teacher's defence lawyer Chua Eng Hui said his client's risk of re-offending was low as "he will never be allowed to teach again".

His client pleaded guilty to seven counts of sexual penetration of a minor, one count of outraging a person's modesty and another of sexual exploitation of a young person, with another 19 charges taken into consideration.

The prosecution had asked for a sentence of six years and six months' jail, saying that the teacher was in a position of authority and had taken advantage of curriculum time to satisfy his sexual urges, in the case of the boy in the computer lab.

He had persisted in inviting the boy to his home and had a consistent modus operandi with the other boys, agreeing to pay one of them and actively seeking out another boy's phone number.

"Individuals who are entrusted with care and authority over the young, as the accused was by virtue of his position as a teacher, and yet abuse this trust and confidence reposed in them thus ought to be harshly condemned," said the prosecutor.

The defence asked instead for six years' jail, saying that his client was remorseful and admitted his offences to the police.

He added that "the main victims were not coerced nor pressured" and were "not particularly vulnerable".

To this, the prosecutor responded that "consent is immaterial" under the charge of sexual penetration of a minor under 16, as it is an offence to have sex with minors with or without their consent.


Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...d-for-bringing-students-home-for-sex-11466464
 
Last edited:

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE — A male teacher at a secondary school who would invite his students to his house and perform sexual acts on them was sentenced to jail for six years and six months on Monday (Apr 22).

The 36-year-old, who cannot be named to protect the identity of his victims, had pleaded guilty to one count of outrage of modesty, one count of sexual exploitation and seven counts of sexual penetration of a minor under 16.

Nineteen other similar charges were taken into consideration for the sentence.

The court heard that between 2016 and 2017, the man, who was diagnosed with paedophilia in Oct 2017, approached several students in his school to come over to his house.


In one such instance in May 2016, the man approached a Secondary 2 boy, whom he had previously taught, while the boy was serving detention for circulating obscene images on his handphone.

The man invited the boy, then aged 14, to come over to his house the next day to watch pornography together.

While the boy initially refused, he later agreed after the man agreed not to tell anyone about their plan and promised to pay the boy S$50 for coming over.

The following day, the boy went over to the man’s house, where they watched pornography together.

The man also performed a sexual act on the boy and paid him S$50 as agreed.

This arrangement continued for almost one and a half years, with the man paying the boy between S$50 to S$300 each time he came over.

OTHER VICTIMS

Sometime in July 2016, the man invited another male student to his house to play video games on his Wii console.

Both he and the student, who was 13 at that time, went to his house after school and played video games in the man’s bedroom.

Sometime during the gaming session, the man carried the boy onto his lap and started moving back and forth. Feeling uncomfortable, the boy then stood up.

Court documents did not state if the boy left immediately after the incident.

In another instance in Aug 2017, the man taught a lesson at the school’s computer lab. When the session in the computer lab ended, the students made their way to another classroom to continue the lesson, but one boy stayed behind to finish some work.

The man approached the boy and asked if he wanted to come over to his house. The boy, then aged 13, refused and walked towards the door of the lab.

While the boy was walking, he felt the man poke his buttocks with his finger several times. Scared, the boy did not question the man and exited the computer lab to join his classmates in the next room to continue the lesson.

After the end of the lesson, the man asked the boy again if he wanted to go to the man’s house. The boy refused and left the classroom immediately.

The man continued to ask the boy to come over to his house after the end of school that day.

The man’s offences eventually came to light when the boy reported the matter to his form teacher.

For the outrage of modesty of a minor, the man could have been jailed for up to five years and received a fine, or caning, or a combination of these punishments.

For each count of sexual penetration with a minor under 16, the man could have received a jail term of up to 10 years, received a fine, or both.

For sexual exploitation of a young person, the man could have received a fine of up to S$10,000 or be imprisoned up to five years, or both.

In the case of a second or subsequent conviction, he could have received a fine of up to S$20,000 or be jailed up to seven years or both.

https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...-exploited-his-students-jailed-over-six-years
 

krafty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
talking about paedo, last time in sg, the mainstream like to use michael jackson as their tool to drive their agenda which i think is very mean and disgusting. mj already passed on but still using his child abuse story to strike pple's mind.
 
Last edited:

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How his wife feel and face him?
Will his wife fear give brith to a son?
:biggrin:
The young boy also know trade for money
No free lunch in this world:biggrin:
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Should have done what the pro-LBGT liberal Sinkie parents did: bring the children to Pink Dot.

14061490.jpg
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How his wife feel and face him?
Will his wife fear give brith to a son?
:biggrin:
The young boy also know trade for money
No free lunch in this world:biggrin:

The biggest worry for the wife is this: does she have shit from another man inside her vagina, probably stuck up in her cervix?
 

Tongkatali

Alfrescian
Loyal
Luckily faggots like Jolovan Wham and Roy Ngerng did not sign up to be Teachers since there are already enough male faggots in MOE.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
I hope this faggot didn't practice tantric sex, that would only give tantric sex a bad name.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Has it ever occurred to people that pedophiles tend to choose professions which allows easy access to children: school teacher, counsellor, early childhood educator, pediatrician etc.

It's not necessarily the pay; for them the children are the biggest job perk. :wink:

And you can't detect who's a pedophile, they could seem perfectly normal.

Sleep well, parents. :cool:
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/s...d-oral-sex-two-male-students-watched-porn-one






Secondary school teacher performed oral sex on two male students, watched porn with one



Shaffiq Alkhatib

The Straits Times

Apr 22, 2019


Facebook Twitter google_plus
Email


SINGAPORE - A secondary school teacher lured three male students to his home and committed sexual acts on the teenagers, even giving cash to one of them for more than a year so that he would keep mum.
When a fourth student declined to go to his home, the teacher molested him in their school in the northern part of Singapore.

The teenager made a police report and the teacher's offences were uncovered.

The 36-year-old man, who has since been diagnosed with paedophilia, was jailed for 6½ years on Monday (April 22). He pleaded guilty to five counts of performing oral sex on two minors and two counts of making one of them perform a similar act on him.

Read also

Music teacher molested teenage student during cello lessons
He also admitted to one count each of molestation and sexually exploiting a child. Nineteen other similar charges were considered during sentencing.
The Straits Times understands that the man is no longer a teacher. He cannot be named due to a gag order to protect the victims' identities.
The man was the first victim's teacher when the teenager was a Secondary 1 student in 2015. The court heard that the teenager was sent to detention on May 9, 2016 for circulating pornographic pictures in his class' Whatsapp group.
The man later spotted the 14-year-old boy in the detention room. Instead of advising the boy to behave himself, he asked the youngster if he wanted to watch pornography together.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Amanda Han said: "The accused asked (the boy) to go to his house and, in exchange, (the boy) asked the accused to pay him $50 so that he would not tell anyone that he had been invited to the accused's house to watch pornography together."
The man agreed and the boy went to his home the next day. The man performed oral sex on him and continued to invite him home after this encounter, the court heard.
DPP Han said: "(The boy) would ask the accused to pay him his desired sum before agreeing to show up at the flat. This sum ranged from $50 to $300 and was not fixed, although it was usually around $100... This continued for almost one and a half years.
"While (the boy) was at the flat, he would also remind the accused that he would tell a teacher about their activities if the accused did not pay (him) as agreed."
The man approached his second victim in their school in July 2016 and asked the 13-year-old boy if he wanted to accompany him home to "play games". The child agreed and followed him to his flat.
The man made the boy sit on his lap while they were playing a computer game and he thrusted his body against the boy. The latter felt uncomfortable and left.
In July 2017, the man sent a text message to his third victim and invited the 15-year-old boy to his home without telling him the reasons. The boy complied and they performed sexual acts on each other.
The pair met up again a few days later and performed similar sexual acts.
DPP Han said the teacher asked his fourth victim to go to his home in August 2017, but the 13-year-old boy declined and the teacher later molested him in school.
For each count of sexually penetrating a minor, the man could have been jailed for up to 10 years and fined.
This article was first published in The Straits Times. Permission required for reproduction.
 
Top