- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 5,058
- Points
- 0
Dear Sirs:
Kindly forward this matter to MHA's Permanent Secretary or his assistance.
I have repeatedly asked Customer Service & QSM of SPF for help to get a response but sofar I am not getting what I am entitled to.
The Police Report was maded in April 2009 and to-date despite many reminders & request for update there has been no satisfactory response with last requests unanswered.
I appreciate the office of PS or Director of MHA giving this matter a push in the right direction.
Yours truly
XXXXXXXXXX
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXX @gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: (SR#: SR/2011/0510/1-FZ8TD) - Activity # - 1-G02QB:CRB 3599/2011 REQUEST FOR UPDATE (Re: (CRB 1995/2009) Re: POLICE REPORT G/20090423/2133 - Monica L.......)
To: SPF Customer Relations Branch <[email protected]>
Cc: SPF Feedback MAYCI <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Dear Sirs:
This is taking a very long time and it is grossly unfair to the victim.
XXXXXXXXXX
===============================
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:56 PM, SPF Customer Relations Branch <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Sir
Thank you for your email of 20 May 2011.
We will check with Bedok Police Division on the matter.
Regards,
Yours faithfully
Chew Lye Soon
Customer Relations Officer
Customer Relations Branch
Singapore Police Force
*******
<[email protected]
om> To
SPF Customer Relations
20 May, 2011 Branch/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV
03:14 PM cc
SPF Feedback
MAYCI/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV
Subject
Re: (SR#: SR/2011/0510/1-FZ8TD) -
Activity # - 1-G02QB:CRB 3599/2011
REQUEST FOR UPDATE (Re: (CRB
1995/2009) Re: POLICE REPORT
G/20090423/2133 - Monica yyyyy)
Dear Sirs:
Second reminder... in fact many reminders already since April 2009.
Can you elevate this matter to your top level please.
Rgds:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
============================================================
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:26 PM, SPF Customer Relations Branch <
[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Sir
We refer to your preceding email of 10 May 2011.
We will inform Bedok Police Division to provide you with an update on the
case.
Regards,
Yours faithfully
Chew Lye Soon
Customer Relations Officer
Customer Relations Branch
Singapore Police Force
*******
To
SPF Customer Relations 10 May,
2011 Branch/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV 04:41
PM
cc
Subject REQUEST FOR UPDATE (Re:
(CRB 1995/2009) Re: POLICE
REPORT G/20090423/2133 - Monica
Dear Sir/Mdm:
Kindly update me on the status of the case lodged in POLICE REPORT
G/200904023/2133 made in April 2009
Yours truly
============================================================
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:12 PM, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote: DSP Tan Teck Kee Bedok Police Division HQ 11th September,
2009 Dear Sir: POLICE REPORT G/200904023/2133 I refer to above complaint
against Monica and/or F.... Employment Agency. This is to
follow up on I/O Iskandar tele-conversation with me and my email followup
dated 19th August, 2009. Monica .... is now claiming that the $400 was
transfer fee due to her company F.... Employment Agency. I mentioned to
Insp. Iskandar that it made no difference as she is the major shareholder
of the agency with the other sleeping partner being her husband who is a
nite club entertainer. There is NO Agreement whatsoever between D...
Pramesti and F.... EA which allows Monica to usurp Desi's $400
unilaterally. My wife, as D...'s employer, was not aware of it nor told
of it (whether before or after the cash withdrawal, or upon handing over
D...'s UOB Saving Book .....).Furthermore who is crazy enough to pay
$1,722 ( 922+400+400 outgoing and incoming maids) when a new maid costs
only $338 at the most. Your attention is drawn to below-captioned email
content that Monica made D.... signed a blank UOB Withdrawal Slip, after
which she backfilled the amount “$400”. She also repeatedly refused to
tell D... what the matter was all about. Is such behaviour or action
normal of someone exercising a legitimate transaction? Monica was
simply helping herself to the maid's hard earned money. As there are two
witness: D Pramesti and my wife ......, Monica
can and should be remanded according to my understanding of police
procedure. I therefore ask that she be remanded soon. Kindly help me
avert a referral of this matter to the Indonesian Embassy. Yours
truly, xxxxxxxxx
EMAIL
RECORD TO I/O ISKANDAR I/O Iskandar via email Bedok
Police Division 19 th
August, 2009 Dear I/O Iskandar: POLICE REPORT G/2009/04/23/2133 –
COMPLAINT AGAINST MONICA yyyyy Thank you for your telephone update
yesterday afternoon. We would record the salient points of the case
against Monica L (hereinafter: ML) herewith. 1. ML now
claims the $400 was transfer fee. This is new to us. In actual fact
it is a lame excuse and we dispute it in totality. If so, why did
she not say so to D... when she repeatedly asked for the reason in
signing the blank UOB Withdrawal Slip? Why my wife, D....'s employer,
was not told about it after she paid ML some $700++ for hiring Desi.
Also our then outgoing maid would have netted ML another $400 making
a total of $1,700 for this transaction. Why would anyone pay such
sum when the going market rate for direct Indonesia recruitment is
only $228? Even if the $400 were bona fide transfer fee (which is
denied), why was here no receipt issuance whether to D.... or my
wife? (sure ML can now fiddle and backfill her books ... that's
another crime). Furthermore it was Mdm Lim ..... , D....'s previous
employer who facilitated this transfer. Do we also give Mdm Lim a
transfer fee? D.... has totally discharged her “hutang” or
debt. While Desi represented zero cost to the EA (all new
Indonesia recruitments carry a cost burden to the EA...) does it
make any sense that a maid under such circumstance need to pay $400?
A clever attempt to cover up but rather insulting to my
intelligence. 2. ML now claims the amount is for her company
F... Employment Agency C-168-01. Record shows the EA was registered
as Joint Partnership of ML and her husband (a nightclub entertainer)
who is a sleeping partner (both metaphorically and literally). Money
going to her company is same as money ending up in her personal
pocket as you won't find her paying any taxes on the revenue. In any
case when a theft is committed, it does not matter where the stolen
money has gone to. In fact both ML and her company is now cupable by
her own admission. She personally took the money and gave it to her
company which kept it knowing it to be stolen item. 3. ML
claims that MOM was aware of this matter (and perhaps gave you a
Robin Goh to check it up). Even if MOM were aware, this is a crime
punishable under the Penal Code and hence outside
MOM purview. Police decision overides. In any case it was Mark Tan
of EA Licensing who handles the complaints against ML, not Robin
Goh. In addition to above I would re-iterate the following: 4.
ML made D.... sign the blank UOB Withdrawal Slip, after which ML
filled in the amount – NOT D.... who was asking repeatedly (but
ML did not give any response despite her being very conversant in
Malay & Bahasa Indonesia – ML's husband is a Malay). 5.
With D...'s UOB Saving Account book (which she had detained all
along), ML went down to UOB branch in Katong Mall to encash without
Desi being present. 6. The next day, the UOB book was given to
my wife (who hired D... and took over custody of D...) without any
explanation given like “the $400 withdrawn was transfer fee payable
by D....). 7. UOB security video taping should show ML in queue
and taking the money & this should nail the case squarely with
one difference – ML is now chargeable with perjury and
obstructing justice. Yours Truly
---------- Forwarded message
---------- From: SPF Customer Relations Branch <
[email protected]> Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:45
PM Subject: (SR#: SR/2009/0819/1-BS7NW) - Activity # - 1-BS92X:CRB
4307/2009 Re: REQUEST OF UPDATE (Re: (CRB 1995/2009) Re: POLICE
REPORT G/20090423/2133) To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Dear Mr ... I refer to your preceding email of 19 Aug 2009. I will
inform Bedok Police Division to forward your email to IO Iskandar. Thank
you and regards. Chew Lye Soon for Quality Service Manager Singapore
Police Force *******
To SPF
Customer Relations 19
Aug, 2009 Branch/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV,
12:13 PM [email protected],
Eng Chuan IYO/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV cc Leo
YIP/MOM/SINGOV@SINGOV, Mark TAN/MOM/SINGOV@SINGOV, Hwi
Chung SNG/MOM/SINGOV@SINGOV Subject
Re: REQUEST OF UPDATE (Re: (CRB
1995/2009) Re: POLICE REPORT
G/20090423/2133) Dear Sir/Mdm: I/O Iskandar from Bedok Police Division
phoned me yester and I wish to record the matter. Please re-email to him
the below-captioned as I do not have his email address.
Yours truly xxxxxxxxxx
I/O Iskandar via email Bedok
Police Division 19 th
August, 2009 Dear I/O Iskandar: POLICE REPORT G/2009/04/23/2133 –
COMPLAINT AGAINST MONICA ...... Thank you for your telephone update
yesterday afternoon. We would record the salient points of the case
against Monica Leong (hereinafter: ML) herewith. 1. ML now
VOTE PAP FOR ANOTHER 5 YEARS OF MISERY & NO PUBLIC SERVICE!!!!!!!!!!
Kindly forward this matter to MHA's Permanent Secretary or his assistance.
I have repeatedly asked Customer Service & QSM of SPF for help to get a response but sofar I am not getting what I am entitled to.
The Police Report was maded in April 2009 and to-date despite many reminders & request for update there has been no satisfactory response with last requests unanswered.
I appreciate the office of PS or Director of MHA giving this matter a push in the right direction.
Yours truly
XXXXXXXXXX
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: XXXXXXXXXXXXX @gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: (SR#: SR/2011/0510/1-FZ8TD) - Activity # - 1-G02QB:CRB 3599/2011 REQUEST FOR UPDATE (Re: (CRB 1995/2009) Re: POLICE REPORT G/20090423/2133 - Monica L.......)
To: SPF Customer Relations Branch <[email protected]>
Cc: SPF Feedback MAYCI <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Dear Sirs:
This is taking a very long time and it is grossly unfair to the victim.
XXXXXXXXXX
===============================
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:56 PM, SPF Customer Relations Branch <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Sir
Thank you for your email of 20 May 2011.
We will check with Bedok Police Division on the matter.
Regards,
Yours faithfully
Chew Lye Soon
Customer Relations Officer
Customer Relations Branch
Singapore Police Force
*******
<[email protected]
om> To
SPF Customer Relations
20 May, 2011 Branch/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV
03:14 PM cc
SPF Feedback
MAYCI/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV
Subject
Re: (SR#: SR/2011/0510/1-FZ8TD) -
Activity # - 1-G02QB:CRB 3599/2011
REQUEST FOR UPDATE (Re: (CRB
1995/2009) Re: POLICE REPORT
G/20090423/2133 - Monica yyyyy)
Dear Sirs:
Second reminder... in fact many reminders already since April 2009.
Can you elevate this matter to your top level please.
Rgds:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
============================================================
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:26 PM, SPF Customer Relations Branch <
[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Sir
We refer to your preceding email of 10 May 2011.
We will inform Bedok Police Division to provide you with an update on the
case.
Regards,
Yours faithfully
Chew Lye Soon
Customer Relations Officer
Customer Relations Branch
Singapore Police Force
*******
To
SPF Customer Relations 10 May,
2011 Branch/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV 04:41
PM
cc
Subject REQUEST FOR UPDATE (Re:
(CRB 1995/2009) Re: POLICE
REPORT G/20090423/2133 - Monica
Dear Sir/Mdm:
Kindly update me on the status of the case lodged in POLICE REPORT
G/200904023/2133 made in April 2009
Yours truly
============================================================
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:12 PM, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote: DSP Tan Teck Kee Bedok Police Division HQ 11th September,
2009 Dear Sir: POLICE REPORT G/200904023/2133 I refer to above complaint
against Monica and/or F.... Employment Agency. This is to
follow up on I/O Iskandar tele-conversation with me and my email followup
dated 19th August, 2009. Monica .... is now claiming that the $400 was
transfer fee due to her company F.... Employment Agency. I mentioned to
Insp. Iskandar that it made no difference as she is the major shareholder
of the agency with the other sleeping partner being her husband who is a
nite club entertainer. There is NO Agreement whatsoever between D...
Pramesti and F.... EA which allows Monica to usurp Desi's $400
unilaterally. My wife, as D...'s employer, was not aware of it nor told
of it (whether before or after the cash withdrawal, or upon handing over
D...'s UOB Saving Book .....).Furthermore who is crazy enough to pay
$1,722 ( 922+400+400 outgoing and incoming maids) when a new maid costs
only $338 at the most. Your attention is drawn to below-captioned email
content that Monica made D.... signed a blank UOB Withdrawal Slip, after
which she backfilled the amount “$400”. She also repeatedly refused to
tell D... what the matter was all about. Is such behaviour or action
normal of someone exercising a legitimate transaction? Monica was
simply helping herself to the maid's hard earned money. As there are two
witness: D Pramesti and my wife ......, Monica
can and should be remanded according to my understanding of police
procedure. I therefore ask that she be remanded soon. Kindly help me
avert a referral of this matter to the Indonesian Embassy. Yours
truly, xxxxxxxxx
RECORD TO I/O ISKANDAR I/O Iskandar via email Bedok
Police Division 19 th
August, 2009 Dear I/O Iskandar: POLICE REPORT G/2009/04/23/2133 –
COMPLAINT AGAINST MONICA yyyyy Thank you for your telephone update
yesterday afternoon. We would record the salient points of the case
against Monica L (hereinafter: ML) herewith. 1. ML now
claims the $400 was transfer fee. This is new to us. In actual fact
it is a lame excuse and we dispute it in totality. If so, why did
she not say so to D... when she repeatedly asked for the reason in
signing the blank UOB Withdrawal Slip? Why my wife, D....'s employer,
was not told about it after she paid ML some $700++ for hiring Desi.
Also our then outgoing maid would have netted ML another $400 making
a total of $1,700 for this transaction. Why would anyone pay such
sum when the going market rate for direct Indonesia recruitment is
only $228? Even if the $400 were bona fide transfer fee (which is
denied), why was here no receipt issuance whether to D.... or my
wife? (sure ML can now fiddle and backfill her books ... that's
another crime). Furthermore it was Mdm Lim ..... , D....'s previous
employer who facilitated this transfer. Do we also give Mdm Lim a
transfer fee? D.... has totally discharged her “hutang” or
debt. While Desi represented zero cost to the EA (all new
Indonesia recruitments carry a cost burden to the EA...) does it
make any sense that a maid under such circumstance need to pay $400?
A clever attempt to cover up but rather insulting to my
intelligence. 2. ML now claims the amount is for her company
F... Employment Agency C-168-01. Record shows the EA was registered
as Joint Partnership of ML and her husband (a nightclub entertainer)
who is a sleeping partner (both metaphorically and literally). Money
going to her company is same as money ending up in her personal
pocket as you won't find her paying any taxes on the revenue. In any
case when a theft is committed, it does not matter where the stolen
money has gone to. In fact both ML and her company is now cupable by
her own admission. She personally took the money and gave it to her
company which kept it knowing it to be stolen item. 3. ML
claims that MOM was aware of this matter (and perhaps gave you a
Robin Goh to check it up). Even if MOM were aware, this is a crime
punishable under the Penal Code and hence outside
MOM purview. Police decision overides. In any case it was Mark Tan
of EA Licensing who handles the complaints against ML, not Robin
Goh. In addition to above I would re-iterate the following: 4.
ML made D.... sign the blank UOB Withdrawal Slip, after which ML
filled in the amount – NOT D.... who was asking repeatedly (but
ML did not give any response despite her being very conversant in
Malay & Bahasa Indonesia – ML's husband is a Malay). 5.
With D...'s UOB Saving Account book (which she had detained all
along), ML went down to UOB branch in Katong Mall to encash without
Desi being present. 6. The next day, the UOB book was given to
my wife (who hired D... and took over custody of D...) without any
explanation given like “the $400 withdrawn was transfer fee payable
by D....). 7. UOB security video taping should show ML in queue
and taking the money & this should nail the case squarely with
one difference – ML is now chargeable with perjury and
obstructing justice. Yours Truly
---------- Forwarded message
---------- From: SPF Customer Relations Branch <
[email protected]> Date: Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:45
PM Subject: (SR#: SR/2009/0819/1-BS7NW) - Activity # - 1-BS92X:CRB
4307/2009 Re: REQUEST OF UPDATE (Re: (CRB 1995/2009) Re: POLICE
REPORT G/20090423/2133) To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Dear Mr ... I refer to your preceding email of 19 Aug 2009. I will
inform Bedok Police Division to forward your email to IO Iskandar. Thank
you and regards. Chew Lye Soon for Quality Service Manager Singapore
Police Force *******
To SPF
Customer Relations 19
Aug, 2009 Branch/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV,
12:13 PM [email protected],
Eng Chuan IYO/SPF/SINGOV@SINGOV cc Leo
YIP/MOM/SINGOV@SINGOV, Mark TAN/MOM/SINGOV@SINGOV, Hwi
Chung SNG/MOM/SINGOV@SINGOV Subject
Re: REQUEST OF UPDATE (Re: (CRB
1995/2009) Re: POLICE REPORT
G/20090423/2133) Dear Sir/Mdm: I/O Iskandar from Bedok Police Division
phoned me yester and I wish to record the matter. Please re-email to him
the below-captioned as I do not have his email address.
Yours truly xxxxxxxxxx
I/O Iskandar via email Bedok
Police Division 19 th
August, 2009 Dear I/O Iskandar: POLICE REPORT G/2009/04/23/2133 –
COMPLAINT AGAINST MONICA ...... Thank you for your telephone update
yesterday afternoon. We would record the salient points of the case
against Monica Leong (hereinafter: ML) herewith. 1. ML now
VOTE PAP FOR ANOTHER 5 YEARS OF MISERY & NO PUBLIC SERVICE!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited:
