• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Manpower Minister: No laws to curb discriminatory hiring by foreigner bosses!

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Laws alone can't fix unfair hiring here
By Jacqueline Woo
My Paper
Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Some Singaporeans have expressed anxiety over perceived discriminatory practices at their workplaces, such as foreign managers hiring from their own home country.

This has, in turn, led to calls for the Government to implement anti-discrimination laws, said Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin yesterday.

He said: "I would suggest that this is not just perception, but it is something that does happen."

While the Government can put in place a system for employers to give qualified Singaporeans a fair chance at being considered for a job, it has to be "measured" in its approach to effectively achieve the desired outcomes, said Mr Tan.

He was speaking at a one-day fair-employment conference organised by the Tripartite Alliance for Fair Employment Practices (Tafep) and the Singapore Tripartism Forum, and held at the Grand Copthorne Waterfront Hotel.

An online report by The Straits Times said that Tafep received a record number of 303 complaints last year, half of which were related to gripes by Singaporeans that their employers prefer foreigners.

While "legislation is not something to rule out altogether", Mr Tan noted that the experiences of some countries have shown that laws alone do not change employers' mindsets.

For instance, some companies might find ways to get around the system even if anti-discriminatory laws are implemented.

He said: "We should also note that having legislation is not a silver bullet that will solve all problems.

"What we want is for people to really change the way they look at things, for employers to have a more progressive mindset.

We cannot legislate changes in mindsets." Mr Tan explained that, for now, Tafep's use of a "moral-suasion approach" in tackling the issue of workplace discrimination is preferred. This is one effective way to shape employers' mindsets and encourage companies to "effect real systemic changes towards progressive and enlightened employment practices", he added.

He said: "We should aim for a balanced approach which can serve Singaporeans well in the long run.


"With or without legislation, discriminatory hiring practices have no place in Singapore."

He also said that, in the past three months, the Manpower Ministry has investigated several employment-discrimination cases.

"Where there are grounds to believe that employers have violated the tripartite guidelines, they could, and some have indeed had, their work-pass privileges curtailed," Mr Tan said.

Tafep presented its annual report yesterday, which showed that it had reached out to more employers last year and got more of them to pledge to practise fair employment.

The event brought together an international audience of over 500 participants, comprising unionists, business leaders and human- resource practitioners.

To foster ownership in preventing workplace discrimination, Mr Heng Chee How, co-chairman of Tafep, urged employers to make the Fair@Work Promise via Facebook. This demonstrates one's commitment to be fair and inclusive at the workplace.

Mr Heng, who is also deputy secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress, added that with consistent effort, employers and employees can work together to create fair and inclusive workplaces "in the face of challenging competition, as well as changing demography".




Get My Paper for more stories.
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Why not? It is so simple by using the 101 method they have been using which is imposing heavy fine. Bait those companies with some fake resumes of foreigners and locals. See who are being called up for the interviews. Catch them and fine them jiaklat jiaklat. Kill chicken warn monkeys.
 
Last edited:

Tuayapeh

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Why not? It is so simple by using the 101 method they have been using which is imposing heavy fine. Bait those companies with some fake resumes of foreigners and locals. See who are being called up for the interviews. Catch them and fine them jiaklat jiaklat. Kill chicken warn monkeys.



Dont wanna do give fucking grandmother excuses understand..... Hes basically tellng you nim peh bo eng,....this is his traitmark response if you sinkies havent realised......he couldnt be fucking bothered....just like his response in the bukit brown saga...... Let you talk talk talk then fuck care you ....do it his own fucking cheebye way
 
Last edited:

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
Anti discrimination laws in other countries end up still have discrimination therefore no need to have such laws...so twisted logic, like that should not have prisons too as have prisons still have criminals not scared of going prisons...moral-suasion is useless without the backup of laws...
 

MBSSLOTS

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The Minister have regular visits by MNCs SVP HRs. So, the usual story go and these HR heads paint wrong picture to the Minister blah blah blah...and the Minister has no guts to challenge these MNCs...who suffers? SINKIES of course who voted these useless PAP.

There is no proper stringent audit on these MNCs. PAP sold away the rights of Singaporeans to these MNCs.
 
Last edited:

DuYunQi

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is the worst response from a minister in charge of a ministry!!

If laws do not work, why have any of them at all?

When SG imposed a law against sales of chewing gum.. did it not work?

Canning for serious crimes.. yes.. still these crimes were committed.. but very much lesser.. cos if convicted.. the worst case is the DEATH penalty. That is also a law.. the death penalty for drug trafficking... that worked.. so why come up with a stupid excuse that anti-discrimination laws won't work?

I have hed enough of lousy ministers like this one. He obviously doesn't realize the true and real situation the ppl in SG face when they work and apply for jobs.

I will not be giving this fella my vote, that's for sure. He is doing nothing for SG citizens, and for the working ppl in SG. We need anti-discrimination laws urgently.. to make the playing field less lob-sided to the advantage of the employers, hiring managers and biz owners.

The discrimination (of any kind) has to stop.. and the anti-discrimination laws have to be put in place.... NOW!!
 
Last edited:

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Many countries both developed and 3rd world like Pinoyland have such discriminatory policies,,,and singkieland does not? The PAP is a World Class gahmen my ass...
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
EDB AND MOM are the greatest culprits for massive imports of PMETS into Singapore.

MNCs just need to TCSS these Ministers and EDB and here you go...no laws,

PAP MUST BE VOTED OUT in 2016


Those people who have friends working in the HR department can check with them how long it takes for them to approval new applications and renewals.
Believe me, you will find them fucking efficient.
 

leetahbah

Alfrescian
Loyal
Follow the malaysians on bumiputra law, certain quota set aside for bumiputra.

Here, PAP need to implement Singaporean First law, every company must have a certain quota of Singaporeans, every university must have certain quota of Singaporeans etc.
 

hungryboi

Alfrescian
Loyal
What is so difficult to impose a law to enforce there must be a certain quota of Singaporean working within the company, especially the finance industry?
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Follow the malaysians on bumiputra law, certain quota set aside for bumiputra.

Here, PAP need to implement Singaporean First law, every company must have a certain quota of Singaporeans, every university must have certain quota of Singaporeans etc.



Spore already has a bumiputra policy unfortunately for "lesser mortals" they are excluded.

Only Spore bumiputras are members, you may have heard of these bumiputras, they are commonly called elites.
 
Last edited:

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
Follow the malaysians on bumiputra law, certain quota set aside for bumiputra.

Here, PAP need to implement Singaporean First law, every company must have a certain quota of Singaporeans, every university must have certain quota of Singaporeans etc.

It is not they are no law with regards to this. They are just not willing to implement it.
 

escher

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Laws alone can't fix unfair hiring here

What the fuck do we need those that create the fucking situation to put it right?

KICK OUT ALL THOSE MOTHERFUCKERS IN WHITE IN 2016
THEN NO NEED THOSE LAWS
AS WE THEN WILL NOT HAVE THOSE FOREIGN TRASH HERE NO MORE
 
Top