Over 400 parents compel children to support them
Sunday Times April 4, 1999
Report by BRAEMA MATHI
About four in five have obtained orders compelling their children to support them in the last three years.
MORE than 400 elderly people have sought the aid of the Tribunal for the Maintenance of Parents since it was set up three years ago.
Of the 424 applicants, 328 or almost four in five were successful in getting orders compelling their children to support them. The rest were dismissed or withdrawn, the tribunal told the Sunday Times.
About two out of three who applied were Chinese. Indians made up at least 14 per cent, and Malays at least 9 per cent. The tribunal's secretary, Mrs Sue Kim Lee, said in an interview that there were more fathers than mothers among the applicants.
"I think it is because mothers tend to get more support from their children than fathers," she said.
Most applicants, she said, were single parents -- widowers, widows or divorcees.
The Maintenance of Parents Act came into force in 1995 to give parents above 60 years old who could not support themselves the legal means to claim maintenance from their children.
In 1996, its first year, 152 filed applications with the tribunal, which is at the Ministry of Community Development building in Thomson Road. The number fell to 138 in 1997 and dipped to 134 last year. As at the end of last year, 357 people have been ordered to pay monthly sums of between $10 and $1,500 to their parents. Because the monthly payments can come from more than one child, applicants receive between $20 and $2700 a month.
The tribunal, headed by former Judicial Commissioner K.S. Rajah, sets what each child pays. It looks at each child's average income, his circumstances, the parent's monthly needs and the parent-child relationship.
If the children are in financial difficulties and cannot make the payments, they can ask the tribunal to review the order.
It reviewed 39 cases in 1997, and 63 last year, as the economic crisis bit deeper.
But not all its decisions go smoothly. While maintenance orders have averaged about 100 a year, the number of enforcement orders taken out has gone from 24 in 1997 to 59 last year. A Family Court mediator, Madam Samsiah Mizah, said that often, the children had become unemployed or were too busy to pay promptly.
Parents, she added, usually wait longer than the one-month grace period before applying for an enforcement order.
She said mediation sessions between parents and children are "less volatile" than those between ex-spouses.
"In these cases there is no shouting, no quarrelling in front of us -- the children do not raise their voices against their parents in front of strangers, and parents, too, maintain their dignity."
Mediation usually takes less than 30 minutes.
Most times, she said, the solution is simply getting people to pick up the telephone to tell their parents that payment will be late.
As they are not on good terms, they may be unwilling to call or may not have the parent's number.
Madam Samsiah said: "If they could just pick up the phone and explain why payment is going to be late, they won't have to come to court. Their parents just want to know what's happening.
"They will then be talking to each other, instead of through the mediator."
Sunday Times April 4, 1999
Report by BRAEMA MATHI
About four in five have obtained orders compelling their children to support them in the last three years.
MORE than 400 elderly people have sought the aid of the Tribunal for the Maintenance of Parents since it was set up three years ago.
Of the 424 applicants, 328 or almost four in five were successful in getting orders compelling their children to support them. The rest were dismissed or withdrawn, the tribunal told the Sunday Times.
About two out of three who applied were Chinese. Indians made up at least 14 per cent, and Malays at least 9 per cent. The tribunal's secretary, Mrs Sue Kim Lee, said in an interview that there were more fathers than mothers among the applicants.
"I think it is because mothers tend to get more support from their children than fathers," she said.
Most applicants, she said, were single parents -- widowers, widows or divorcees.
The Maintenance of Parents Act came into force in 1995 to give parents above 60 years old who could not support themselves the legal means to claim maintenance from their children.
In 1996, its first year, 152 filed applications with the tribunal, which is at the Ministry of Community Development building in Thomson Road. The number fell to 138 in 1997 and dipped to 134 last year. As at the end of last year, 357 people have been ordered to pay monthly sums of between $10 and $1,500 to their parents. Because the monthly payments can come from more than one child, applicants receive between $20 and $2700 a month.
The tribunal, headed by former Judicial Commissioner K.S. Rajah, sets what each child pays. It looks at each child's average income, his circumstances, the parent's monthly needs and the parent-child relationship.
If the children are in financial difficulties and cannot make the payments, they can ask the tribunal to review the order.
It reviewed 39 cases in 1997, and 63 last year, as the economic crisis bit deeper.
But not all its decisions go smoothly. While maintenance orders have averaged about 100 a year, the number of enforcement orders taken out has gone from 24 in 1997 to 59 last year. A Family Court mediator, Madam Samsiah Mizah, said that often, the children had become unemployed or were too busy to pay promptly.
Parents, she added, usually wait longer than the one-month grace period before applying for an enforcement order.
She said mediation sessions between parents and children are "less volatile" than those between ex-spouses.
"In these cases there is no shouting, no quarrelling in front of us -- the children do not raise their voices against their parents in front of strangers, and parents, too, maintain their dignity."
Mediation usually takes less than 30 minutes.
Most times, she said, the solution is simply getting people to pick up the telephone to tell their parents that payment will be late.
As they are not on good terms, they may be unwilling to call or may not have the parent's number.
Madam Samsiah said: "If they could just pick up the phone and explain why payment is going to be late, they won't have to come to court. Their parents just want to know what's happening.
"They will then be talking to each other, instead of through the mediator."
