https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-10-21/doc-ifxeuwws6564131.shtml
美退出《中导条约》为对抗中国 专家:需提高自卫能力
2018年10月21日 13:06 环球网
资料图：戈尔巴乔夫和里根签署《中导条约》
[环球时报-环球网报道 记者 倪浩]30年条约将在一日撕毁。美国总统特朗普当地时间20日宣布，将退出与俄罗斯签订的《中导条约》。中国导弹技术专家杨承军在21日接受《环球时报》记者采访时认为，美国此举极不负责，有可能对世界导弹武器竞争起到推波助澜的作用。美国之举同时也警示中国，必须要更有效的提高国家安全的自卫防范能力。
特朗普当天在回应媒体时表示，俄罗斯多年来违反了《中导条约》的规定，而美国向来遵守条约，因此决定撤出此条约。他说，“俄罗斯违反了条约，他们都违反了好几年了，我不知道为什么奥巴马任职时不和他们谈谈，为什么奥巴马没有决定退出这个条约。”
《中导条约》全称是《苏联和美国消除两国中程和中短程导弹条约》，由美国和苏联于1987年12月8日签署，1988年生效。条约规定两国不再保有、生产或试验射程在500公里至5500公里的陆基巡航导弹和弹道导弹。据悉，双方至今销毁2692枚导弹。这一举动被认为是冷战高峰时期的降温之举，美苏通过销毁中导的方式消除了冷战末期笼罩在欧洲大陆上空的核阴霾。
但近年来，美俄多次相互指责对方违反条约，美国甚至威胁会像2001年退出美苏1972年签署的《限制反弹道导弹系统条约》一样退出《中导条约》。在双方互相指责之中，矛盾日益激烈。此前，美国国家安全顾问博尔顿已建议美国总统特朗普退出该条约。20日，特朗普终于公开宣布将退出《中导条约》。
但在美俄互相指责中，中国无故躺枪。特朗普在当天的讲话中提到中国，他表示，“如果俄罗斯继续这么搞，中国继续这么搞，而美国还在捍卫、遵循这个条约，那这事就没法接受了。”《纽约时报》表示，美退出《中导条约》另一个目的是为了对抗中国。因为中导条约的限制，美国无法在西太平洋部署中导武器，这赋予了（中国人民）解放军中导打击的优势。
杨承军向《环球时报》分析认为，美国退出条约将会产生一系列消极影响，将对世界核军备和导弹武器的军备竞争起到推波助澜的作用。“导弹武器技术并不复杂，综合国力并不强的国家都可以批量生产，甚至有些射程已经接近远程。对这些国家来说，发展导弹武器本不受《中导条约》限制，美国退出条约意味着，它们在美俄示范下又或将摆脱联合国相关协议约束，可随意发展常规中程、中近程导弹。
杨承军说，导弹武器与其他任何常规武器相比都具有无可比拟的优越性，将直接影响战争的进程，甚至是结局，从而被发展中国家认为是一条“投资少、见效快，迅速提升综合国力的有效途径。“如果大家都可以违反国际约束，对这些国家来讲何乐而不为呢？因此，《中导条约》若将变成一张废纸，势必引起一轮国际范围的导弹武器的军备竞赛。”
杨承军还认为，《中导条约》若作废，地区安全也将增加不安定因素。“因为中程和中近程导弹实际打击范围最大为4000公里左右，用得最多的是地区武装冲突，如果放开发展，对于地区武装冲突的强度和升级都会带来负面影响。”
对于特朗普无故在讲话中牵涉中国，杨承军认为，“特朗普近年来在任何问题上都不忘捎带攻击中国，即使与中国并没有任何关系的时候也会这样。他的这种说法，非常没有根据，也不负责。对此我觉得没有必要去进行专门的反驳。”
《中导条约》一旦沦为废纸，杨承军认为对中国的国家安全也将带来负面影响，同时也再次提示中国必须要更有效的提高国家安全的自卫防范能力。杨承军进一步分析说，中国与美国的国家利益不同，军事防范也不一样。“中国有1.8万多公里陆地边防线，有2.2万多公里的海防线，中国维护国家安全的任务非常艰巨；而且周边并不太平，无论是台海方向、南海方向，还是印度方向和东北亚方向，中国面临的周边国家安全威胁，比任何一个国家都要严峻。相比之下，美国并没有受到来自多个方向的军事威胁，所以我们必须根据维护国家安全的需要，来适度发展中程导弹和中近程导弹，这是维护中国国家核心利益的需要。”
杨承军预测认为，基于特朗普一贯的政策主张以及一系列的“退群”行为，提出退出《中导条约》并不奇怪，而且大概率会得到执行。“但他这么做对国际现有的业已建立起来的政治、经济和军事秩序都会带来极大的冲击。因此我们呼吁，各国要切实遵守国际社会所达成的共识，让各种条约保持稳定性和合法性。不随意要出尔反尔，动辄推翻。这是非常不严肃的儿戏做法。”
关键字 : 中导条约美国特朗普国家安全
我要反馈
Https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-10-21/doc-ifxeuwws6564131.shtml
The United States withdraws from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" as a confrontation with China's experts: the need to improve self-defense capabilities
October 21, 2018 13:06 Global Network
Data Map: Gorbachev and Reagan Sign the "Guide to the Guide"
[Global Times - Global Network Reporter Ni Hao] The 30-year treaty will be torn up in one day. US President Trump announced on the 20th that he will withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" signed with Russia. Yang Chengjun, a Chinese missile technology expert, said in an interview with the Global Times on the 21st that the US is extremely irresponsible and may play a role in fueling the world's missile weapons competition. The US move also warns China that it must be more effective in improving the self-defense ability of national security.
In response to the media, Trump said that Russia has violated the provisions of the "Guidelines on the Treaty" for many years, and the United States has always complied with the treaty and therefore decided to withdraw the treaty. He said, "Russia violated the treaty. They have been violating the law for several years. I don't know why Obama did not talk to them when he was in office. Why did Obama not decide to withdraw from the treaty?"
The "Guide to the Central Treaty" is the "Soviet and US Elimination of the Medium and Medium-Range Missile Treaty between the two countries." It was signed by the United States and the Soviet Union on December 8, 1987, and came into force in 1988. The treaty stipulates that the two countries no longer maintain, produce or test land-based cruise missiles and ballistic missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers. It is reported that the two sides have destroyed 2,692 missiles. This move was considered to be the cooling of the cold war period. The United States and the Soviet Union eliminated the nuclear haze over the European continent at the end of the Cold War by destroying the middle guide.
However, in recent years, the United States and Russia have repeatedly accused each other of violating the treaty. The United States even threatened to withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Treaty of China" as it was with the withdrawal of the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems signed by the United States and the Soviet Union in 1972. In the mutual accusation between the two sides, the contradictions have become increasingly fierce. Earlier, US National Security Adviser Bolton has recommended that US President Trump withdraw from the treaty. On the 20th, Trump finally publicly announced that he would withdraw from the "Guide to the Central Treaty."
But in the United States and Russia accused each other, China lay a gun for no reason. Trump mentioned China in his speech that day. He said, "If Russia continues to do so, China will continue to do so, and the United States is still defending and following this treaty, then this matter cannot be accepted." The New York Times "The other purpose of the US withdrawal from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" is to fight against China. Because of the restrictions of the China-Treaty Treaty, the United States could not deploy weapons in the Western Pacific, which gave the Chinese People's Liberation Army the advantage of being the leader.
Yang Chengjun analyzed in the Global Times that the withdrawal of the United States from the treaty will have a series of negative effects and will play a role in fueling the world's nuclear arms and missile weapons competition. "The technology of missile weapons is not complicated. Countries with weak comprehensive national strength can produce in batches, and even some ranges are close to remote. For these countries, the development of missile weapons is not subject to the "Guidelines", and the withdrawal of the United States from the treaty means They may, under the US-Russian demonstration, be free from the constraints of relevant UN agreements and develop random mid-range and medium-range missiles at will.
Yang Chengjun said that missile weapons have unparalleled superiority compared with any other conventional weapons, and will directly affect the progress of the war and even the outcome, which is considered by developing countries to be "less investment, quick effect, rapid improvement and comprehensiveness." An effective way for national strength. "If everyone can violate international constraints, why not be happy with these countries?" Therefore, if the "Guidance Treaty" will become a piece of waste paper, it will inevitably lead to a round of international arms race arms race. ”
Yang Chengjun also believes that if the "Guide to the Central Treaty" is invalidated, regional security will also increase the unrest factor. "Because the actual range of medium- and medium-range missiles is about 4,000 kilometers, the most used area is the regional armed conflict. If the development is liberalized, it will have a negative impact on the intensity and upgrading of regional armed conflicts."
For Trump to involve China in his speech for no reason, Yang Chengjun believes that "Trump has not forgotten to attack China on any issue in recent years, even if it has nothing to do with China. His statement, Very unfounded and not responsible. I don't think it is necessary to make a special rebuttal."
Once the "Guidelines on the Treaty" became a waste paper, Yang Chengjun believed that China's national security would also have a negative impact. At the same time, it also reminded China that it must improve its national security self-defense ability more effectively. Yang Chengjun further analyzed that China and the United States have different national interests and military defenses are different. "China has more than 18,000 kilometers of land border defense lines and more than 22,000 kilometers of coastal defense lines. China's task of maintaining national security is very difficult; and the surrounding area is not peaceful, whether it is the direction of the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, the direction of India and the direction of Northeast Asia. China’s security threats to neighboring countries are more severe than any other country. By contrast, the United States has not been subjected to military threats from multiple directions, so we must moderately develop medium-range missiles in accordance with the need to maintain national security. And medium- and short-range missiles, this is the need to safeguard China’s national core interests."
Yang Chengjun predicted that it is not surprising to withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Guide" based on Trump's consistent policy proposition and a series of "retreat" behaviors, and the high probability will be implemented. "But he has done a great impact on the existing political, economic and military order that has been established in the world. Therefore, we call on all countries to abide by the consensus reached by the international community and to maintain stability in various treaties. And legitimacy. It’s a very unscrupulous trick to be unwilling to go back and forth.
Keywords : China-Turkey Treaty US Trump National Security
I want feedback
美退出《中导条约》为对抗中国 专家:需提高自卫能力
2018年10月21日 13:06 环球网
资料图：戈尔巴乔夫和里根签署《中导条约》
[环球时报-环球网报道 记者 倪浩]30年条约将在一日撕毁。美国总统特朗普当地时间20日宣布，将退出与俄罗斯签订的《中导条约》。中国导弹技术专家杨承军在21日接受《环球时报》记者采访时认为，美国此举极不负责，有可能对世界导弹武器竞争起到推波助澜的作用。美国之举同时也警示中国，必须要更有效的提高国家安全的自卫防范能力。
特朗普当天在回应媒体时表示，俄罗斯多年来违反了《中导条约》的规定，而美国向来遵守条约，因此决定撤出此条约。他说，“俄罗斯违反了条约，他们都违反了好几年了，我不知道为什么奥巴马任职时不和他们谈谈，为什么奥巴马没有决定退出这个条约。”
《中导条约》全称是《苏联和美国消除两国中程和中短程导弹条约》，由美国和苏联于1987年12月8日签署，1988年生效。条约规定两国不再保有、生产或试验射程在500公里至5500公里的陆基巡航导弹和弹道导弹。据悉，双方至今销毁2692枚导弹。这一举动被认为是冷战高峰时期的降温之举，美苏通过销毁中导的方式消除了冷战末期笼罩在欧洲大陆上空的核阴霾。
但近年来，美俄多次相互指责对方违反条约，美国甚至威胁会像2001年退出美苏1972年签署的《限制反弹道导弹系统条约》一样退出《中导条约》。在双方互相指责之中，矛盾日益激烈。此前，美国国家安全顾问博尔顿已建议美国总统特朗普退出该条约。20日，特朗普终于公开宣布将退出《中导条约》。
但在美俄互相指责中，中国无故躺枪。特朗普在当天的讲话中提到中国，他表示，“如果俄罗斯继续这么搞，中国继续这么搞，而美国还在捍卫、遵循这个条约，那这事就没法接受了。”《纽约时报》表示，美退出《中导条约》另一个目的是为了对抗中国。因为中导条约的限制，美国无法在西太平洋部署中导武器，这赋予了（中国人民）解放军中导打击的优势。
杨承军向《环球时报》分析认为，美国退出条约将会产生一系列消极影响，将对世界核军备和导弹武器的军备竞争起到推波助澜的作用。“导弹武器技术并不复杂，综合国力并不强的国家都可以批量生产，甚至有些射程已经接近远程。对这些国家来说，发展导弹武器本不受《中导条约》限制，美国退出条约意味着，它们在美俄示范下又或将摆脱联合国相关协议约束，可随意发展常规中程、中近程导弹。
杨承军说，导弹武器与其他任何常规武器相比都具有无可比拟的优越性，将直接影响战争的进程，甚至是结局，从而被发展中国家认为是一条“投资少、见效快，迅速提升综合国力的有效途径。“如果大家都可以违反国际约束，对这些国家来讲何乐而不为呢？因此，《中导条约》若将变成一张废纸，势必引起一轮国际范围的导弹武器的军备竞赛。”
杨承军还认为，《中导条约》若作废，地区安全也将增加不安定因素。“因为中程和中近程导弹实际打击范围最大为4000公里左右，用得最多的是地区武装冲突，如果放开发展，对于地区武装冲突的强度和升级都会带来负面影响。”
对于特朗普无故在讲话中牵涉中国，杨承军认为，“特朗普近年来在任何问题上都不忘捎带攻击中国，即使与中国并没有任何关系的时候也会这样。他的这种说法，非常没有根据，也不负责。对此我觉得没有必要去进行专门的反驳。”
《中导条约》一旦沦为废纸，杨承军认为对中国的国家安全也将带来负面影响，同时也再次提示中国必须要更有效的提高国家安全的自卫防范能力。杨承军进一步分析说，中国与美国的国家利益不同，军事防范也不一样。“中国有1.8万多公里陆地边防线，有2.2万多公里的海防线，中国维护国家安全的任务非常艰巨；而且周边并不太平，无论是台海方向、南海方向，还是印度方向和东北亚方向，中国面临的周边国家安全威胁，比任何一个国家都要严峻。相比之下，美国并没有受到来自多个方向的军事威胁，所以我们必须根据维护国家安全的需要，来适度发展中程导弹和中近程导弹，这是维护中国国家核心利益的需要。”
杨承军预测认为，基于特朗普一贯的政策主张以及一系列的“退群”行为，提出退出《中导条约》并不奇怪，而且大概率会得到执行。“但他这么做对国际现有的业已建立起来的政治、经济和军事秩序都会带来极大的冲击。因此我们呼吁，各国要切实遵守国际社会所达成的共识，让各种条约保持稳定性和合法性。不随意要出尔反尔，动辄推翻。这是非常不严肃的儿戏做法。”
关键字 : 中导条约美国特朗普国家安全
我要反馈
Https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-10-21/doc-ifxeuwws6564131.shtml
The United States withdraws from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" as a confrontation with China's experts: the need to improve self-defense capabilities
October 21, 2018 13:06 Global Network
Data Map: Gorbachev and Reagan Sign the "Guide to the Guide"
[Global Times - Global Network Reporter Ni Hao] The 30-year treaty will be torn up in one day. US President Trump announced on the 20th that he will withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" signed with Russia. Yang Chengjun, a Chinese missile technology expert, said in an interview with the Global Times on the 21st that the US is extremely irresponsible and may play a role in fueling the world's missile weapons competition. The US move also warns China that it must be more effective in improving the self-defense ability of national security.
In response to the media, Trump said that Russia has violated the provisions of the "Guidelines on the Treaty" for many years, and the United States has always complied with the treaty and therefore decided to withdraw the treaty. He said, "Russia violated the treaty. They have been violating the law for several years. I don't know why Obama did not talk to them when he was in office. Why did Obama not decide to withdraw from the treaty?"
The "Guide to the Central Treaty" is the "Soviet and US Elimination of the Medium and Medium-Range Missile Treaty between the two countries." It was signed by the United States and the Soviet Union on December 8, 1987, and came into force in 1988. The treaty stipulates that the two countries no longer maintain, produce or test land-based cruise missiles and ballistic missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers. It is reported that the two sides have destroyed 2,692 missiles. This move was considered to be the cooling of the cold war period. The United States and the Soviet Union eliminated the nuclear haze over the European continent at the end of the Cold War by destroying the middle guide.
However, in recent years, the United States and Russia have repeatedly accused each other of violating the treaty. The United States even threatened to withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Treaty of China" as it was with the withdrawal of the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems signed by the United States and the Soviet Union in 1972. In the mutual accusation between the two sides, the contradictions have become increasingly fierce. Earlier, US National Security Adviser Bolton has recommended that US President Trump withdraw from the treaty. On the 20th, Trump finally publicly announced that he would withdraw from the "Guide to the Central Treaty."
But in the United States and Russia accused each other, China lay a gun for no reason. Trump mentioned China in his speech that day. He said, "If Russia continues to do so, China will continue to do so, and the United States is still defending and following this treaty, then this matter cannot be accepted." The New York Times "The other purpose of the US withdrawal from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" is to fight against China. Because of the restrictions of the China-Treaty Treaty, the United States could not deploy weapons in the Western Pacific, which gave the Chinese People's Liberation Army the advantage of being the leader.
Yang Chengjun analyzed in the Global Times that the withdrawal of the United States from the treaty will have a series of negative effects and will play a role in fueling the world's nuclear arms and missile weapons competition. "The technology of missile weapons is not complicated. Countries with weak comprehensive national strength can produce in batches, and even some ranges are close to remote. For these countries, the development of missile weapons is not subject to the "Guidelines", and the withdrawal of the United States from the treaty means They may, under the US-Russian demonstration, be free from the constraints of relevant UN agreements and develop random mid-range and medium-range missiles at will.
Yang Chengjun said that missile weapons have unparalleled superiority compared with any other conventional weapons, and will directly affect the progress of the war and even the outcome, which is considered by developing countries to be "less investment, quick effect, rapid improvement and comprehensiveness." An effective way for national strength. "If everyone can violate international constraints, why not be happy with these countries?" Therefore, if the "Guidance Treaty" will become a piece of waste paper, it will inevitably lead to a round of international arms race arms race. ”
Yang Chengjun also believes that if the "Guide to the Central Treaty" is invalidated, regional security will also increase the unrest factor. "Because the actual range of medium- and medium-range missiles is about 4,000 kilometers, the most used area is the regional armed conflict. If the development is liberalized, it will have a negative impact on the intensity and upgrading of regional armed conflicts."
For Trump to involve China in his speech for no reason, Yang Chengjun believes that "Trump has not forgotten to attack China on any issue in recent years, even if it has nothing to do with China. His statement, Very unfounded and not responsible. I don't think it is necessary to make a special rebuttal."
Once the "Guidelines on the Treaty" became a waste paper, Yang Chengjun believed that China's national security would also have a negative impact. At the same time, it also reminded China that it must improve its national security self-defense ability more effectively. Yang Chengjun further analyzed that China and the United States have different national interests and military defenses are different. "China has more than 18,000 kilometers of land border defense lines and more than 22,000 kilometers of coastal defense lines. China's task of maintaining national security is very difficult; and the surrounding area is not peaceful, whether it is the direction of the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, the direction of India and the direction of Northeast Asia. China’s security threats to neighboring countries are more severe than any other country. By contrast, the United States has not been subjected to military threats from multiple directions, so we must moderately develop medium-range missiles in accordance with the need to maintain national security. And medium- and short-range missiles, this is the need to safeguard China’s national core interests."
Yang Chengjun predicted that it is not surprising to withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Guide" based on Trump's consistent policy proposition and a series of "retreat" behaviors, and the high probability will be implemented. "But he has done a great impact on the existing political, economic and military order that has been established in the world. Therefore, we call on all countries to abide by the consensus reached by the international community and to maintain stability in various treaties. And legitimacy. It’s a very unscrupulous trick to be unwilling to go back and forth.
Keywords : China-Turkey Treaty US Trump National Security
I want feedback
