• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

M Ravi: Regrettable For MOH To Issue Public Statement In Support Of Dismissal

xingguy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
3,107
Points
83
Source: The Online Citizen

M Ravi: Regrettable for MOH to issue public statement in support of dismissal
June 11 2014 17:36

Lawyer M Ravi, representing blogger Roy Ngerng has issued a public statement expressing regret in response to the media statements made by Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) and the Ministry of Health (MOH).

M Ravi states that his client is currently being privately sued for defamation by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and said, “pending a final judgement of the Singapore Courts of the civil proceedings for defamation, that lawsuit is sub judice. Its outcome remains a matter for the Courts to determine. The is the rule of law”

Earlier in May this year, Ngerng was sued by PM Lee over allegation misappropriation of Central Provident Fund money by the prime minister in one of the posts made by Ngerng in his blog, “The Heart Truths”.

In the statement, M Ravi request for restraint to be exercised in relation to issuing public statements about decisions and inferences in relation to matters that are connected to the subject mater of the lawsuit and added that it is regrettable that MOH has seen fit to issue a public statement that it supports TTSH’s decision to terminate Ngerng’s employment.

Yesterday, Ngerng was dismissed by TTSH from his job as a patient coordinator. TTSH explained that the dismissal is due to Ngerng’s continued misuse of the hospital’s time and resources to pursue personal and non-job-related interests despite a warning given last May when Ngerng’s contract was up for renewal.

In the statement released by TTSH, the hospital said, “Mr Ngerng’s conduct was incompatible with the values and standards we expect of our employees. While our staff are free to pursue their personal interests outside work, they must conduct themselves properly, honourably and with integrity. In particular, they cannot defame someone else without basis, which essentially means knowingly stating a falsehood to the public.”

MOH also issued a press statement saying that it supports TTSH’s decision to terminate Mr Ngerng’s contract, as his “actions show a lack of integrity and are incompatible with the values and standards of behaviour expected of hospital employees”.

The defamation suit between Ngerng and PM Lee will be heard in court.

Statement by Lawyer M Ravi

gview

gview

Letter to TTSH & MOH
 
haven't received verdict already made judgement?

funny sinkie judicial system.

guilty first until proven innocent!! LOL!
 
haven't received verdict already made judgement?

funny sinkie judicial system.

guilty first until proven innocent!! LOL!


not supirsied. even the gods here have dont that before
 
The MIWs have shot themselves in the foot, and leaving their finger prints all over the place. As Ravi says, the MOH is not a party to the employment contract between Roy and TTSH. It is not wrong therefore, to assume that TTSH was told to fire Roy. As a precedence, will MOH be issuing statements for all contract employees fired by any of the hospitals.

Not very different from the firing of Alfian Sa'at who was fired from his relief teacher post by MOE although the principal of the school had consistently rated him highly.
 
People still remember alfian. Thats a good thing. In a first world country any hospital would been sued for wrongful termination immediately. And they would have paid through the nose. The publicity alone would have damaged business. Whats their hurry? We know its going to be a guilty verdict anyway. Why not a suspension?
 
Back
Top