Lynn Lee said her comments were" taken out of context" by Wikileaks

[Leepotism]

[h=2]Former Straits Times reporter Lynn Lee refutes Wikileaks cable[/h]Posted on 03 September 2011
<!-- ShareThis -->

<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>var shared_object = SHARETHIS.addEntry({title: "Former Straits Times reporter Lynn Lee refutes Wikileaks cable",url: "http://newnation.sg/2011/09/former-straits-times-reporter-lynn-lee-refutes-wikileaks-cable/"});</SCRIPT>In this letter to her former paper’s editors, she denies suggesting a disconnect between management and reporters.
The note was originally published here. Also read the original report on the leaked cable.
Hi everyone,
Thanks for reading The Straits Times and for your support of this FB fan page.
I left Jakarta the week before last, after 2.5 years of an extremely exciting and meaningful experience reporting on Indonesia. I have since left The Straits Times to pursue a new career outside journalism.
A few days ago, Wikileaks released a US Embassy cable that quoted my name. This is my response to it. I sent an excerpt of this note to my former editors at the ST. They replied to thank me for making these clarifications.
I met with a political officer of the US Embassy in 2008 for an informal contact meeting, prior to my Jakarta posting.
I am not making excuses – his cable misrepresented what I said and I would like to place on record what actually transpired.
I did not say or suggest that there was a “disconnect” between editors and reporters at the The Straits Times. Neither did I say I would “never write about racially-sensitive issues”. My comments were taken wholly out of context.
The political officer was interested in whether reporters and their supervisors in the ST newsroom ever disagreed on story angles. He suggested that reporters – especially those who had gone to school in a liberal environment such as in the US – would feel constrained for whatever reason in the newsroom.
My response included these points: That reporters and their editors did engage in discussions over how stories should be written – with the ultimate aim being to produce balanced reports – but that the editors would of course have the final word on what went into print.
What I also said was that I believe that the ST is run by smart people who strive to do what’s best for its readers, even as they face pressure from a government seeking to set the tone and form of media coverage.
This is a position I held openly and consistently throughout my eight-year career at The Straits Times.
I also stated that I would not want to write articles containing racially-charged remarks that could incite hatred or create rifts within society. I pointed out an example of how baseless comments could create or aggravate tensions among people. I am surprised that what I still believe to be a responsible position to take was misconstrued as self-censorship.
Neither did I suggest in any way that I was “discouraged” with my life as a Singapore journalist. I expressed my readiness to take on a new challenge and learn about a new country. I said that I would need a year at the very least to assess if the role was right for me.
My recent decision to leave journalism had everything to do with my own personal goals. I wanted to try something new and the right opportunity came up. It was not related to opinions referred to above that I openly held nor to the suggested – and misrepresented – angst the cable indicated I felt.
I have had a fulfilling and rewarding time working with my editors at the paper.
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> <!-- //OBSTART:do_NOT_remove_this_comment var OutbrainPermaLink="http://newnation.sg/2011/09/former-straits-times-reporter-lynn-lee-refutes-wikileaks-cable/"; if(typeof(OB_Script)!='undefined'){OutbrainStart();} else { var OB_PlugInVer="7.0.0.0_Regular";;var OB_raterMode="none";var OB_recMode="strip";var OBITm="1301142691";var OB_Script=true;var OB_langJS="http://widgets.outbrain.com/lang_en.js";document.write(unescape("<script src='http://widgets.outbrain.com/OutbrainRater.js' type='text/javascript'></script>"));} //OBEND:do_NOT_remove_this_comment //--> </SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://widgets.outbrain.com/OutbrainRater.js"></SCRIPT><SCRIPT id=undefined type=text/javascript src="http://widgets.outbrain.com/mu/templates/stripBoxTemplate.js?v=42206"></SCRIPT>
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=odbPingIframeId src="about<strong></strong>:blank" frameBorder=0 name=odbFrame></IFRAME>
<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=odbPingIframeId src="about<strong></strong>:blank" frameBorder=0 name=odbFrame></IFRAME>

<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=odbPingIframeId src="about<strong></strong>:blank" frameBorder=0 name=odbFrame></IFRAME>
[TABLE="class: outbrain-table-recommendations-bottom"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]

<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 0px; DISPLAY: none; HEIGHT: 0px" id=odbPingIframeId src="about:blank" frameBorder=0 name=odbFrame></IFRAME>
<FIELDSET style="PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 8px; DISPLAY: block" id=recommendationsFieldset_0_rec class="outbrain-recommendationsFieldset-ie outbrain-ie-old outbrain-border"><IMG style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px">


<LEGEND class=Outbrain_recommendations_legend>You might like:</LEGEND>

• Is Temasek Review Dead?
• Scrapping of EP - do you agree?
• Recruit Express - Don't get cheated
• Who is this ?

</FIELDSET>[TABLE="class: outbrain-table-recommendations-bottom"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD]
[/TD]
[TD]
[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]

 

[Leepotism]

I think she's very scared now, knowing too well how the scums in white might punish her.

 

[po2wq]

never mind la ...

154th like 2 oso take ppl out of context 1 ... let other ppl gif their ppl a taste of their own medicine la ... u in dat line, u can oni noe 2 wel ... 人地窒两句,湿湿碎 你埋骨声吞左佢 lor! ... :o

 

[refulgence]

An ex-journalist who is fully engaged in damage control, despite her assertions to the contrary.

 

[ahleebabasingaporethief]

She is obviously not of Catherine Lim or Ivy Singh Lim category.

What do you expect her to say? That she really made the statements. I wish she backed up instead of backing down.

BUT that is SINGAPOREANS today. Even when they know there are wrongs, they bo lumpar and expect the wrongs. BUT, this is changing fast.

 

[Leepotism]

Bo lumpar to admit. But since she's a woman, where got lumpar?

 

[borom]

A legacy of Nathan and Tony Tan-this is their " contribution" and we all know how they were rewarded.

 

[zeddy]

When things like these happened, the usual excuse will be '' my comments were taken out of context''...

 

[Cestbon]

I think she have been threaten by someone to sue her until bankrupt that why suddenly back down from statement. She cannot e trusted anymore her career is as journalist is bye bye.

 

[scroobal]

None of the above.

She recently joined a PR but more importantly a lobby group that was set-up by high stakes Ang Mos who take on expensive assignments and not the usual PR jobs. They targeted clients are Govt linked Companies and Quasi govt bodies with big budget.

The issue is not ST, or the Govt Authorities but the potential clients who might have the impression that she is taboo where the govt is concerned and damage her new employers.

Nobody with half a brain is going to meet a political officer for coffee. If you read the report, both the SPH staff did not reveal anything. No Minister or Editors details were revealed. It was baiting to see who the IOs are and what they are interested in.