• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lucky Tan: AIM-PAP Saga : The Explanation that explains nothing!

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
AIM-PAP Saga : The Explanation that explains nothing!

The main issue with the sale of town council management software to a PAP owned company with a clause that gives the PAP company the right to terminate use of the software if an opposition takes over the town council is that of conflict of interest. It is equivalent to the Democratic Party selling the US Social Security computer software it a company it owns then giving the company the right to stop the Republicans from using it when it recapture the presidency in elections. The AIM deal gives enormous power to the PAP to stop the opposition from running the town councils effectively when they are chosen by the constituents to be their representatives in parliament. Therein lies the conflict of interest. The rights of the people are not protected and they are put at risk.

Why Dr Teo's technical and procedural "explanations" are flawed and nonsensical....

- http://singaporemind.blogspot.sg/2013/01/aim-pap-saga-explanation-that-explains.html
 
can lah PAP more trustworthy than oppositions like SDP...:D
 
Gone are the good old days. This thing will blow over. Nothing will happen. Sit tight Teo, don't worry too much. They don't have much people left so will not do anything to you.
 
Possible copyright infringement.

The original licensee must not carry on using the software after the sale, otherwise it will be infringing copyright. It must make its own copy
of the software “unusable”. Technical protection measures may provide some help, but in practice it will be hard for Oracle and other software houses
to be absolutely sure whether the original customer is still using in parallel with the acquirer of the second-hand copy.

http://m.mayerbrown.com/files/Publi...pdate_aug12_software-licence-transferable.pdf
 
Back
Top