- Joined
- Oct 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,830
- Points
- 113
LTK bites PAppies big time with blockbuster speech
Madam Speaker, this is a sad day for Parliament that we have to hear and debate the dispute of the descendants of our founding Prime Minister, Mr Lee Kuan Yew.
It is sadder still that this whole saga is centred on Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will, because his will on 38 Oxley Rd is well known.
I’d like to state on the outset that the Workers’ Party has only a simple and broad position on this unfortunate saga, that is the Workers’ Party is concerned about how this saga would affect our nation.
The opinions of the Workers’ Party members and MPs on the other aspects of the issues are just as diverse as public opinion has been in these few weeks. As an outsider to this dispute, I personally believe the acrimony between the Lee descendants has much deeper roots than just the fate of the house arising out of the will.
This is because all sides seem to be willing to risk the national interest by bringing this private matter into the public domain. This is the fundamental point that I want to make, which I personally feel strongly about.
The problem with this whole saga is that the line between the private and the public has been blurred and crossed too many times by the Prime Minister, the Lee siblings and the Government too.
We need to restore the line, make it bright red line, resolve the aspect of dispute that have crossed into the public domain and push the dispute back into the private domain.
We need to do this so as to move on to far more important issues that are truly national issues. This saga is distracting the Government, distracting Singaporeans and distracting the international audience and damaging the Singapore brand.
Crossing the line between the private and the public.
Madam Speaker, the line between the private and the public is a very important one for good governance. It is also the foundation of Singapore’s unforgiving anti-corruption stance.
Unfortunately in this whole saga I personally think that the line has been blurred and crossed many times by all sides.
First, Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling should not make vague allegations in the public domains against the Prime Minister based on scant evidence centred on family displeasure.
Making allegations that appear to be calculated to undermine the Prime Minister’s authority does not make for constructive politics in Singapore. It is a reckless thing to do and I do not see how this is in the national interest.
If the accusers have details and concrete evidence that the Prime Minister has been lying and abusing his power, allowing his wife to influence the appointment of public officials, they should have made all of them public by now. They should not be waging a continuous media campaign to keep the nation in suspense.
However, the Government has also contributed to the squabble. It does not help that the Prime Minister and some of his Cabinet colleagues have responded in kind in Facebook and even making counter-allegations on the motive and character of the other party.
The Government should set an example and needs to maintain its dignity in the face of insults to its integrity. They should not get involved in Facebook brawl for the whole world to see. Cabinet members more than anyone else should refrain from making insinuations about the character and motivations of the accusers. The Government should not continue with this dispute in the public domain.
Madam Speaker, good government cannot be achieved in social media.
The PM is faced with serious allegations from his brother and sister. These allegations need to be addressed in a proper manner.
As the PM once said himself such matters cannot be just “you say, I say,” it is the hallmark of the PAP government in the past to get to the bottom of such matter via the court.
I believe that the “you say, I say” exchange will continue in social media if the PM fails to take action to put it to a stop.
The PM have said earlier in the ministerial statement seems to hope to resolve this issue after this parliament session but how sure he is that his sibling will not continue to make the allegations or having new allegations against him.
He’s already being accused of trying to cover up and whitewash himself by using parliament.
Next, it seems to me that the Minister for Law was a close personal friend of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and other members of the Lee family. He has now fallen out with some members of the Lee family.
Dr Lee Wei Ling says he was a changed person. He was previously involved in giving personal advice relating to Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will, however, he’s also now part of the ministerial committee which is looking at the issue of the house arising from the will. Is there not a conflict of interest there?
Furthermore, the current Attorney-General Lucien Wong was acting as Mr Lee Hsien Loong’s personal lawyer in his private dispute against his siblings but now the same person is in the position to advise the Government and the Cabinet on matters related to the house and Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will. Is there also a conflict of interest here?
More at Oxley Rd Dispute: Low Thia Khiang Full Parliamentary speech
Madam Speaker, this is a sad day for Parliament that we have to hear and debate the dispute of the descendants of our founding Prime Minister, Mr Lee Kuan Yew.
It is sadder still that this whole saga is centred on Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will, because his will on 38 Oxley Rd is well known.
I’d like to state on the outset that the Workers’ Party has only a simple and broad position on this unfortunate saga, that is the Workers’ Party is concerned about how this saga would affect our nation.
The opinions of the Workers’ Party members and MPs on the other aspects of the issues are just as diverse as public opinion has been in these few weeks. As an outsider to this dispute, I personally believe the acrimony between the Lee descendants has much deeper roots than just the fate of the house arising out of the will.
This is because all sides seem to be willing to risk the national interest by bringing this private matter into the public domain. This is the fundamental point that I want to make, which I personally feel strongly about.
The problem with this whole saga is that the line between the private and the public has been blurred and crossed too many times by the Prime Minister, the Lee siblings and the Government too.
We need to restore the line, make it bright red line, resolve the aspect of dispute that have crossed into the public domain and push the dispute back into the private domain.
We need to do this so as to move on to far more important issues that are truly national issues. This saga is distracting the Government, distracting Singaporeans and distracting the international audience and damaging the Singapore brand.
Crossing the line between the private and the public.
Madam Speaker, the line between the private and the public is a very important one for good governance. It is also the foundation of Singapore’s unforgiving anti-corruption stance.
Unfortunately in this whole saga I personally think that the line has been blurred and crossed many times by all sides.
First, Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling should not make vague allegations in the public domains against the Prime Minister based on scant evidence centred on family displeasure.
Making allegations that appear to be calculated to undermine the Prime Minister’s authority does not make for constructive politics in Singapore. It is a reckless thing to do and I do not see how this is in the national interest.
If the accusers have details and concrete evidence that the Prime Minister has been lying and abusing his power, allowing his wife to influence the appointment of public officials, they should have made all of them public by now. They should not be waging a continuous media campaign to keep the nation in suspense.
However, the Government has also contributed to the squabble. It does not help that the Prime Minister and some of his Cabinet colleagues have responded in kind in Facebook and even making counter-allegations on the motive and character of the other party.
The Government should set an example and needs to maintain its dignity in the face of insults to its integrity. They should not get involved in Facebook brawl for the whole world to see. Cabinet members more than anyone else should refrain from making insinuations about the character and motivations of the accusers. The Government should not continue with this dispute in the public domain.
Madam Speaker, good government cannot be achieved in social media.
The PM is faced with serious allegations from his brother and sister. These allegations need to be addressed in a proper manner.
As the PM once said himself such matters cannot be just “you say, I say,” it is the hallmark of the PAP government in the past to get to the bottom of such matter via the court.
I believe that the “you say, I say” exchange will continue in social media if the PM fails to take action to put it to a stop.
The PM have said earlier in the ministerial statement seems to hope to resolve this issue after this parliament session but how sure he is that his sibling will not continue to make the allegations or having new allegations against him.
He’s already being accused of trying to cover up and whitewash himself by using parliament.
Next, it seems to me that the Minister for Law was a close personal friend of Mr Lee Kuan Yew and other members of the Lee family. He has now fallen out with some members of the Lee family.
Dr Lee Wei Ling says he was a changed person. He was previously involved in giving personal advice relating to Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will, however, he’s also now part of the ministerial committee which is looking at the issue of the house arising from the will. Is there not a conflict of interest there?
Furthermore, the current Attorney-General Lucien Wong was acting as Mr Lee Hsien Loong’s personal lawyer in his private dispute against his siblings but now the same person is in the position to advise the Government and the Cabinet on matters related to the house and Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will. Is there also a conflict of interest here?
More at Oxley Rd Dispute: Low Thia Khiang Full Parliamentary speech
