- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
[h=2]The author forgot that low tax in SG is a myth if the indirect taxes and fleecing on the average Joe is taken into account. The real beneficiaries are the corrupt and connected individuals who are able to 'manage' and 'massage' their tax obligations!
PM says we pay low taxes but forgot to mention we earn low wages too[/h]
June 11th, 2012 |
Author: Contributions
PM Lee
Read a Straits Times article (Jun 9) about PM Lee explaining why Singapore should not follow the same socially focused policies which have been successful in Sweden and Norway.
Again, the PM brought up the merit-based system Singapore practices and the low tax percentage we have here.
From the article:
He says that the Nordic nations can afford such large social expenditures because of the higher taxes citizens pay. BUT he neglects to mention that the citizens in those countries also earn wages much higher than Singaporeans.
The minimum living wage in Singapore for blue collar workers is simply too low for tax to be any higher. And the very rich continue to get richer with extremely high pay and very low taxes!
According to Singapore’s Gini coefficient, we have one of the most unequal income distributions in the world. That and Singapore is also the 8th most expensive cities to live in in the world (http://www.mercer.com/press-releases/1311145).
All this means that our attempts at keeping taxes low are also coupled with measures that keep low-end wages low as inflation rises uncontrollably and living becomes more and more impossible for the average citizen.
How can Singaporeans be happy when most of us are earning a decreasing living wage??? At the same time, are we keeping taxes low to keep the average Singaporean happy, or simply just to appease the very rich minority responsible for most of our GDP?
I think we should stop looking at the “differences” between us and the Nordic nations and stop excusing ourselves from adapting their system.
Isn’t it time we evaluate what is wrong with the way we work that makes it so difficult for us to achieve the same balance and success the Nordic countries have?
.
VOTEUOUT
PM says we pay low taxes but forgot to mention we earn low wages too[/h]



Read a Straits Times article (Jun 9) about PM Lee explaining why Singapore should not follow the same socially focused policies which have been successful in Sweden and Norway.
Again, the PM brought up the merit-based system Singapore practices and the low tax percentage we have here.
From the article:
“Essentially, it came down to one fundamental choice: Low taxes and targeted welfare benefits – as Singapore has – or high taxes and comprehensive welfare.
‘You can have one or the other, cannot mix and match,’ observed Mr Lee, at a dinner for the Economic Society of Singapore.
Nordic nations, he noted, had natural resources, a rich hinterland in Europe, and long histories as homogeneous societies which were willing to pay high taxes for high social protection.
‘I do not believe that Singaporeans would be willing to pay the taxes that Scandinavians pay, or that our economy could be competitive at such heavy tax rates,’ said Mr Lee.”
What I don’t think the government understands, is that Singaporeans are not willing to pay more taxes (for the sake of better social welfare) simply because wages in Singapore are currently too low, and inflation too high.‘You can have one or the other, cannot mix and match,’ observed Mr Lee, at a dinner for the Economic Society of Singapore.
Nordic nations, he noted, had natural resources, a rich hinterland in Europe, and long histories as homogeneous societies which were willing to pay high taxes for high social protection.
‘I do not believe that Singaporeans would be willing to pay the taxes that Scandinavians pay, or that our economy could be competitive at such heavy tax rates,’ said Mr Lee.”
He says that the Nordic nations can afford such large social expenditures because of the higher taxes citizens pay. BUT he neglects to mention that the citizens in those countries also earn wages much higher than Singaporeans.
The minimum living wage in Singapore for blue collar workers is simply too low for tax to be any higher. And the very rich continue to get richer with extremely high pay and very low taxes!
According to Singapore’s Gini coefficient, we have one of the most unequal income distributions in the world. That and Singapore is also the 8th most expensive cities to live in in the world (http://www.mercer.com/press-releases/1311145).
All this means that our attempts at keeping taxes low are also coupled with measures that keep low-end wages low as inflation rises uncontrollably and living becomes more and more impossible for the average citizen.
How can Singaporeans be happy when most of us are earning a decreasing living wage??? At the same time, are we keeping taxes low to keep the average Singaporean happy, or simply just to appease the very rich minority responsible for most of our GDP?
I think we should stop looking at the “differences” between us and the Nordic nations and stop excusing ourselves from adapting their system.
Isn’t it time we evaluate what is wrong with the way we work that makes it so difficult for us to achieve the same balance and success the Nordic countries have?
.
VOTEUOUT