- Joined
- Sep 9, 2011
- Messages
- 7,813
- Points
- 0
Cerebral said:I may not be a mathematical wizard, but the number does not add up. If the target is only 2.1 and the reason for importing FT is to help the decreasing birth rate, then how did we end up with 5 million in 10 years? Someone is not telling the hard truth...
There was a screw up in the calculation. Somebody took in the FT's numbers now what would be required in 25 years' time. I believe there was a Lucky Tan (?) analysis on this.