Spot on. If we are questioning the govt's transparency why take MHA word for it? Some people are just brainwashed too far or just brain dead.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Lesson Learnt For MHA and PAP
- Thread starter TracyTan866
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 3,393
- Points
- 0
hahaha....when pple disagree with the views of anti-papee, they are invariably brained washed, brained dead; etc......
we can agree to diasgree but should not resort to name calling.....this is childish and naive.
we can agree to diasgree but should not resort to name calling.....this is childish and naive.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 3,393
- Points
- 0
hahaha....in this case, WanBao has jumped the gun.
Many people (junior to senior) in the civil service are investigated each year.
Disciplinary actions are taken accordingly......they are staff-in-confidence and not publicised.
Cases will only come to light when the culprits are formally charged in court.
Nothing unusual with such HR policy.
So the answer is NO as they have not been formally charged.
In fact MHA had been forced to reveal more than usual.
Similar threads
