• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lesson 101 on how to 'siam' those traffic demerit points

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Apres what the AGC said, I’m left to wonder whether it’s really true that if one got someone to lie to the police, then one didn’t really lie to the police but merely abetted someone to lie and by inference less cuplpable than the person who directly lied to the police?

Also, the fact that the person who lied to the police is a 76-year-old employee — and thus could be deemed to be a vulnerable employee — matters less than the fact that the good doctor didn’t give the said employee any ”favours”.

Now I wish the AGC could give us a primer on how one could go round hugging old men and stealing their money but don’t end up in years of preventive detention like this hapless woman!

- http://singaporegirl.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/another-legal-mystery/
 
Back
Top