-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Leongsam the Cyclist Strikes Again!
- Thread starter AhMeng
- Start date
Cyclist points middle finger, throws own bicycle at car in a fit of rage
Cycle of anger. Nyi Nyi Thet | January 2, 02:24 pm
Have you ever been angry enough to take your own bicycle and throw it against a car?
No? This guy has.
According to a post by Antonio Tan, this incident took place on September 30, 2018.
He is posting it again now to appeal for help identifying the man.
He posted this video on December 31, 2018, on Facebook group, Singapore Reckless Drivers.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?st...book.com/plugins/video.php&locale2=en_US&_rdr
In the video, the car was waiting to turn at a junction. However, as the driver moved off, a cyclist came into the frame of the video.
Perhaps angered by the driver, and his inability to see him, the cyclist got into presumably a war of words with the driver. Middle fingers are thrown indiscriminately.
The cyclist then placed his bike on the car, and appeared to urge the driver to “lai” (retaliate).
The driver however declined
The driver then attempted to skirt around the cyclist, but was hit by his bicycle.
Cycle of anger. Nyi Nyi Thet | January 2, 02:24 pm
Have you ever been angry enough to take your own bicycle and throw it against a car?
No? This guy has.
According to a post by Antonio Tan, this incident took place on September 30, 2018.
He is posting it again now to appeal for help identifying the man.
He posted this video on December 31, 2018, on Facebook group, Singapore Reckless Drivers.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?st...book.com/plugins/video.php&locale2=en_US&_rdr
In the video, the car was waiting to turn at a junction. However, as the driver moved off, a cyclist came into the frame of the video.
Perhaps angered by the driver, and his inability to see him, the cyclist got into presumably a war of words with the driver. Middle fingers are thrown indiscriminately.
The cyclist then placed his bike on the car, and appeared to urge the driver to “lai” (retaliate).
The driver however declined
The driver then attempted to skirt around the cyclist, but was hit by his bicycle.
Is that a ang moh cyclist?
Look at the speed of the traffic.i wouldn't cycle on these kind of roads.
And why ang mohs behave like they own the island? It belongs to the malays. Must be polite and well mannered as in malay culture.
Look at the speed of the traffic.i wouldn't cycle on these kind of roads.
And why ang mohs behave like they own the island? It belongs to the malays. Must be polite and well mannered as in malay culture.
hanor, malay culture dictates that even flinging the delivery box off a basikal or motisikal on a car bonnet is disrespectful - especially one that's decorated like a ketupat
The front wheel and back wheel looked different pattern. This guy also a cheapo stealing spare parts is it?
Will u do it?
there’s hope for sinkies. this will teach sinkies to fight back. otherwise machiam like church mice and blind lemmings.
KNN the driver should have just move on tactically and crushed the bicycle without injuring the amdk KNN
KNN the cyclist didn't respect his own bike not fit to be in leong sam cycling community KNN
Exactly my same thought. Driver must be a wimpy looking bespectacled fella. Try that with me and his bicycle handlebars will be up his fucking ass.
That is why singkies need to be well versed in the law,,,,and show the cops that it is not a civil case,,cite them the statutes etc,,,get the cops off their ass and do some work
Mischief 425. Whoever, with intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public or any person, causes the destruction of any property, or any such change in any property, or in the situation thereof, as destroys or diminishes its value or utility, or affects it injuriously, commits “mischief”.
Explanation 1.—It is not essential to the offence of mischief that the offender should intend to cause loss or damage to the owner of the property injured or destroyed. It is sufficient if he intends to cause, or knows that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to any person by injuring any property, whether it belongs to that person or not.
Explanation 2.—Mischief may be committed by an act affecting property belonging to the person who commits the act, or to that person and others jointly.
Illustrations
(a) A voluntarily burns a valuable security belonging to Z, intending to cause wrongful loss to Z. A has committed mischief.
(b) [Deleted by Act 51 of 2007]
(c) A voluntarily throws into a river a ring belonging to Z, with the intention of thereby causing wrongful loss to Z. A has committed mischief.
(d) A, knowing that his effects are about to be taken in execution in order to satisfy a debt due from him to Z, destroys those effects, with the intention of thereby preventing Z from obtaining satisfaction of the debt, and of thus causing damage to Z. A has committed mischief.
(e) A, having insured a ship, voluntarily causes the same to be cast away, with the intention of causing damage to the underwriters. A has committed mischief.
(f) A causes a ship to be cast away, intending thereby to cause damage to Z, who has lent money on bottomry on the ship. Ahas committed mischief.
(g) A, having joint property with Z in a horse, shoots the horse, intending thereby to cause wrongful loss to Z. A has committed mischief.
(h) [Deleted by Act 51 of 2007]
[51/2007]
[Indian PC 1860, s. 425]
Punishment for committing mischief 426. Whoever commits mischief shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
[51/2007]
[Indian PC 1860, s. 426]
Committing mischief and thereby causing loss or damage to the amount of $500 427. Whoever commits mischief and thereby causes loss or damage to the amount of $500 or upwards, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both.
[51/2007]
[Indian PC 1860, s. 427]
Mischief by killing or maiming any animal 428. Whoever commits mischief by killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless, any animal shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 5 years, or with fine, or with both.
[51/2007]
[Indian PC 1860, s. 428]
https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PC1871?ProvIds=P4XVII-P4_425-.
Last edited:
Foreigners cum to Singapore because we have rules in place, but not applicable to them.
AMDK will not do this in China, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand or Indonesia.
PAP's pride indeed
The only civilized way is to run over and kill him, be awarded a National Hero, decorated highly on NDP. Make it Constitutional.
Similar threads
