-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Lee Suet Fern suspended 15 months by disciplinary body ( 20 Nov 2020 )
- Thread starter Kee Chew
- Start date
I bet that after this LSF case has been resolved LHY will disappear from the political scene.
Nothing in it for him to give his brother trouble anymore.
Wait kena worse backlash from his brother.
I agree..... this sore loser . . . . he will just siam far far away!
now, what have he done besides endorsing his wife, so-called supporting his sons whilst all of them are banished away from motherland, sillypore.
he dun even dare to stand side-by-side with TCB during GE!
its so evidence from his facebook comments . . . . so timidly written I disagree or I endorsed etc etc. . . . .
dun rely on him to save the country from his eunuch bro and empress dowager - he only cares for himself as always!
the whole yang will just walk away from this country to fend for themselves!
Maybe he try to and die.
LKY lack foresight.
A lot of his "foresight" for singapore is actually done by his colleagues like lim kim san and others...
His actual foresight was suzhou industrial park which failed, asking all to only give birth to 2 children which caused our lack of population now...
So his family now fighting over inheritance is very normal as he lack foresight and selfish to set it straight for his children.
This suspesion is given out of revenge. not out of common law. This court needs to be banned like how Trump did to any kangaroo courts.
like example if you are a Postman.
you cannot FOC send a pacel for your family members ?
Postal Office will suspend you if you do ?
Siblings fighting over parents wealth is toxic, and the relationship among the grandchildren is finish.... Hot wire...
This is what Singaporeans voted for. What a waste of national resources and energy to focus on such thing!!!!
this fight is not about wealth exactly; its about annihilation for/by sifat loong to safekeep his legacy to his boy under his empress' command!
honestly, how much is the shaggy oxley house worth to them . . .
but pathing the roadmap for his legacy requires total extinctions of rivals are what it is . . . . . what draws 2 reputable grown-ups towards such idiotic acts started since the moment hongyi is touted by his eunuch dad! this was also what LKY did to all his benefitors after he ascended his throne! he was also the creator of all today's minions (once for the purpose to look after sifat loong and looser yang) . . . .
undeniably true! who cares if sifat loong wanna wrestle his siblings but to expense country resources activating the whole parliamentary committee, then AGC;s instigations, and now bending the law with these 3 stooges in court ruling . . . . all these clearly showed the world how "democratic" this country has been and will be !!!
anyway, the world oledi condemn sillypore as a wayang country with no oppositions! a so-called autocratic nation run by dominance, elitism, cronyism, nepotism etc.
freedom of speech? pui! .....
Yet , 60% voted for him and his team
therein lies the problem
in a democracy than LHL became the righteous and you and I are wrong
it’s as simple as that
/
Shut down TRS
37 m ·
The court of 3 judges has confirmed the disciplinary tribunal report that Lee Hsien Yang and his wife Lee Suet fern had misled LKY to sign a will that saw them gain a significant interest for themselves.
They have found to have lied to the ministerial committee with their inconsistent and contradictory statements given. Lee Hsien Yang also admitted that the facebook statements he made are inaccurate.
The actions of Lee Hsien Yang and wife after the 38 Oxley saga shows things aren't as simple as a case of a filial son trying to defend his father's dying wish.
With them colluding with the anti-establishment, donating money to opposition members to fight his own brother and the whole government his father built, and lastly joining PSP. This is basically spitting on LKY's grave. A dishonourable son.
It is pretty clear Lee Hsien Yang is vengeful and jealous of PM Lee. The favorite son of LKY. Trying to do whatever it takes to take his older brother down together with the whole Singapore with it.
Source:
https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/.../-2020-sghc-255-pdf.pdf
/
Shut down TRS
37 m ·
The court of 3 judges has confirmed the disciplinary tribunal report that Lee Hsien Yang and his wife Lee Suet fern had misled LKY to sign a will that saw them gain a significant interest for themselves.
They have found to have lied to the ministerial committee with their inconsistent and contradictory statements given. Lee Hsien Yang also admitted that the facebook statements he made are inaccurate.
The actions of Lee Hsien Yang and wife after the 38 Oxley saga shows things aren't as simple as a case of a filial son trying to defend his father's dying wish.
With them colluding with the anti-establishment, donating money to opposition members to fight his own brother and the whole government his father built, and lastly joining PSP. This is basically spitting on LKY's grave. A dishonourable son.
It is pretty clear Lee Hsien Yang is vengeful and jealous of PM Lee. The favorite son of LKY. Trying to do whatever it takes to take his older brother down together with the whole Singapore with it.
Source:
https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/.../-2020-sghc-255-pdf.pdf
/
/
Good 100pages . Very Good Read .
/
https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/doc...7Wg23yXocc9PM25Tj2IynYuUHoG-S0lNcKlgNcf1gWySw
/
Source:
https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/.../-2020-sghc-255-pdf.pdf
Good 100pages . Very Good Read .
/
https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/doc...7Wg23yXocc9PM25Tj2IynYuUHoG-S0lNcKlgNcf1gWySw
/
Source:
https://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/.../-2020-sghc-255-pdf.pdf
Why nothing abt Sifat loong and Ho Ching, both so holy mah?
It is your who is dishourable and the PAP
Why prosecute Lee Suet Fern for helping with LKY’s will when nothing was said of Kwa Geok Choo drafting LKY’s 1995 will when she was a direct beneficiary?
by Ghui
24 November 2020
in Opinion
Reading Time: 2min read
23
The verdict as to Lee Suet Fern’s (Mrs Lee) disciplinary hearing in relation to her role in the amendment of Lee Kuan Yew’s (LKY) Will (Final WIll) is now final with no further recourse to appeal. The basis of the Law Society’s case against her is that there was a conflict of interest present in her involvement with the Final Will because her husband, Lee Hsien Yang (LHY) was a Beneficiary in the Final Will.
While the Court of Three Judges (COTJ) ordered Mrs Lee to be suspended from legal practice in Singapore for 15 months, it is noteworthy that none of Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, Judge of Appeal Judith Prakash and High Court judge Woo Bih Li were of the opinion that there was a solicitor-client relationship between Mrs Lee and LKY. Further, the Court also found no dishonesty in Mrs Lee’s dealings with LKY and nor was there any finding that the Final Will was procured by fraud or undue influence.
In view of this, it, therefore, seems tenuous to find Mrs Lee guilty of misconduct when it was accepted that she was not LKY’s lawyer in the first place?
Yet, the highest disciplinary body for the legal profession in Singapore found Mrs Lee guilty of misconduct which was unbefitting an advocate and solicitor, saying that she had “blindly followed the directions of her husband, a significant beneficiary under the very will whose execution she helped to rush through”.
So, it would appear that the basis for her 15-month suspension hangs on the premise that there was a conflict of interest that arose because her husband was a Beneficiary.
What then of LKY’s Will in 1995 (1995 Will)?
The 1995 Will was publicly said to be drafted by LKY’s wife, Kwa Geok Choo (KGC), a prominent Singaporean lawyer who was the co-founder and partner of law firm Lee & Lee.
Apart from drafting the 1995 Will, KGC was also a significant beneficiary to the 1995 Will with LKY bequeathing all movable and immovable property to her as his wife. Isn’t that a conflict of interest too?
Part of Lee Kuan Yew’s will in 1995.
In fact, it is arguably an even bigger conflict of interest than Mrs Lee’s!
Mrs Lee was not a direct Beneficiary to LKY’s Final Will – her husband was. KGC, however, was a direct beneficiary of the 1995 Will that she also drafted! Why then was nothing said of her conflict of interest in the matter?
If helping in the arrange in the witnessing of the Final Will where her husband (not her) was a beneficiary constitutes as a conflict of interest for Mrs Lee, isn’t drafting a Will where you are also a significant beneficiary (as in KGC’s case) much worse?
Noting that LKY was alive and well in the production of both the 1995 will and his last will in Dec 2013, why then prosecute Mrs Lee when nothing was said of KGC back in 1995? And with the ruling by the COTJ, would lawyers now be adverse to providing assistance to family members since they can be censured as in Mrs Lee’s case?
Correction made on Mrs Lee’s role in the will
24 November 2020
in Opinion
Reading Time: 2min read
23
The verdict as to Lee Suet Fern’s (Mrs Lee) disciplinary hearing in relation to her role in the amendment of Lee Kuan Yew’s (LKY) Will (Final WIll) is now final with no further recourse to appeal. The basis of the Law Society’s case against her is that there was a conflict of interest present in her involvement with the Final Will because her husband, Lee Hsien Yang (LHY) was a Beneficiary in the Final Will.
While the Court of Three Judges (COTJ) ordered Mrs Lee to be suspended from legal practice in Singapore for 15 months, it is noteworthy that none of Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, Judge of Appeal Judith Prakash and High Court judge Woo Bih Li were of the opinion that there was a solicitor-client relationship between Mrs Lee and LKY. Further, the Court also found no dishonesty in Mrs Lee’s dealings with LKY and nor was there any finding that the Final Will was procured by fraud or undue influence.
In view of this, it, therefore, seems tenuous to find Mrs Lee guilty of misconduct when it was accepted that she was not LKY’s lawyer in the first place?
Yet, the highest disciplinary body for the legal profession in Singapore found Mrs Lee guilty of misconduct which was unbefitting an advocate and solicitor, saying that she had “blindly followed the directions of her husband, a significant beneficiary under the very will whose execution she helped to rush through”.
So, it would appear that the basis for her 15-month suspension hangs on the premise that there was a conflict of interest that arose because her husband was a Beneficiary.
What then of LKY’s Will in 1995 (1995 Will)?
The 1995 Will was publicly said to be drafted by LKY’s wife, Kwa Geok Choo (KGC), a prominent Singaporean lawyer who was the co-founder and partner of law firm Lee & Lee.
Apart from drafting the 1995 Will, KGC was also a significant beneficiary to the 1995 Will with LKY bequeathing all movable and immovable property to her as his wife. Isn’t that a conflict of interest too?
In fact, it is arguably an even bigger conflict of interest than Mrs Lee’s!
Mrs Lee was not a direct Beneficiary to LKY’s Final Will – her husband was. KGC, however, was a direct beneficiary of the 1995 Will that she also drafted! Why then was nothing said of her conflict of interest in the matter?
If helping in the arrange in the witnessing of the Final Will where her husband (not her) was a beneficiary constitutes as a conflict of interest for Mrs Lee, isn’t drafting a Will where you are also a significant beneficiary (as in KGC’s case) much worse?
Noting that LKY was alive and well in the production of both the 1995 will and his last will in Dec 2013, why then prosecute Mrs Lee when nothing was said of KGC back in 1995? And with the ruling by the COTJ, would lawyers now be adverse to providing assistance to family members since they can be censured as in Mrs Lee’s case?
Correction made on Mrs Lee’s role in the will
Similar threads
