• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Keling Lawyer Helps Violent Killer Get Less Than 10 Years Jail Sentence After Good Behaviour!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE - A burglar who bludgeoned a temple helper to death during a break-in was sentenced to 14 years' jail and six strokes of the cane on Monday (Jan 15).

Jobless Loh Suan Lit entered a Choa Chu Kang temple in the wee hours to steal valuables but panicked when he was caught by Tan Poh Huat, who slept on the premises.

Loh reached for a tool from his backpack and repeatedly bludgeoned the 53-year-old, leaving him with 93 external injuries all over his body, fractures to his skull, jaw and nose, and a burst eyeball. He died from a crushed voice box.

Loh pleaded guilty to one charge of culpable homicide and one unrelated charge of burgling a stall at Beauty World Food Centre.

The killing took place between 2.30am and about 3.10am on Feb 14, 2016, at the Choa Chu Kang Combined Temple on Teck Whye Lane.

In sentencing, Justice Chua Lee Ming accepted arguments by the defence that Loh's attack was not premeditated. However, the High Court judge agreed with prosecutors that the attack was "brutal and vicious", pointing to the number of injuries.


The court heard that on the evening of Feb 13, 2016, Loh bought a hammer, a saw, a screwdriver and a chisel from a hardware store, intending to break into the temple to steal gold chains placed on religious statues and donations offered by devotees.

That night, he made his way to the temple, with the tools in his backpack.

As there were still people around, he left and went to a nearby coffeeshop where he took some pills to "get high" and watched a football match.

At about 2.30am the following day, he returned to the temple, putting on a surgical mask, gloves and cap.

Loh climbed over the back wall and walked around, trying to prise open several locked doors using his tools. But he realised he was making too much noise and decided to stop.

As he was leaving the temple, he heard Mr Tan shouting "Oi!".

Panicking, Loh reached for a tool and hit Mr Tan repeatedly until the victim became unconscious.

He then climbed out of the temple, returned to his Marsiling flat and later threw away the tools. They were never recovered.

Mr Tan's body was discovered at about 7am by another helper. He was covered in blood and there were bloodstains on the floor, chairs and ladder near his body. Trails of blood led to the back gate. A total of $2,868 in cash was found on him.

An autopsy report said that marks found on Loh's head and body were consistent with the use of an object with a circular head, such as a hammer.

Police established Loh's identity after reviewing surveillance footage and conducting investigations.

Loh, who left for Malaysia on Feb 19, was arrested on Feb 24 as he was returning to Singapore via Woodlands checkpoint.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Wen Hsien, argued that there was no reason for Loh to have resorted to violence by assaulting the unarmed victim. Loh's "pre-emptive" strike was a deliberate and calculated act, she said.

Defence counsel Sunil Sudheesan argued that Loh had no intention to silence the victim and that he just wanted to get out.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...helper-in-aborted-burglary-gets-14-years-jail
 

Truth_Hurts

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singkieland really going to the dogs...now violent criminals are getting lighter sentences. At least in the past. It was really u do the crime u do the time... anyway of it was an opposition politician jay walking. It will be a death sentence
 

blissquek

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE - A burglar who bludgeoned a temple helper to death during a break-in was sentenced to 14 years' jail and six strokes of the cane on Monday (Jan 15).

Jobless Loh Suan Lit entered a Choa Chu Kang temple in the wee hours to steal valuables but panicked when he was caught by Tan Poh Huat, who slept on the premises.

Loh reached for a tool from his backpack and repeatedly bludgeoned the 53-year-old, leaving him with 93 external injuries all over his body, fractures to his skull, jaw and nose, and a burst eyeball. He died from a crushed voice box.

Loh pleaded guilty to one charge of culpable homicide and one unrelated charge of burgling a stall at Beauty World Food Centre.

The killing took place between 2.30am and about 3.10am on Feb 14, 2016, at the Choa Chu Kang Combined Temple on Teck Whye Lane.

In sentencing, Justice Chua Lee Ming accepted arguments by the defence that Loh's attack was not premeditated. However, the High Court judge agreed with prosecutors that the attack was "brutal and vicious", pointing to the number of injuries.


The court heard that on the evening of Feb 13, 2016, Loh bought a hammer, a saw, a screwdriver and a chisel from a hardware store, intending to break into the temple to steal gold chains placed on religious statues and donations offered by devotees.

That night, he made his way to the temple, with the tools in his backpack.

As there were still people around, he left and went to a nearby coffeeshop where he took some pills to "get high" and watched a football match.

At about 2.30am the following day, he returned to the temple, putting on a surgical mask, gloves and cap.

Loh climbed over the back wall and walked around, trying to prise open several locked doors using his tools. But he realised he was making too much noise and decided to stop.

As he was leaving the temple, he heard Mr Tan shouting "Oi!".

Panicking, Loh reached for a tool and hit Mr Tan repeatedly until the victim became unconscious.

He then climbed out of the temple, returned to his Marsiling flat and later threw away the tools. They were never recovered.

Mr Tan's body was discovered at about 7am by another helper. He was covered in blood and there were bloodstains on the floor, chairs and ladder near his body. Trails of blood led to the back gate. A total of $2,868 in cash was found on him.

An autopsy report said that marks found on Loh's head and body were consistent with the use of an object with a circular head, such as a hammer.

Police established Loh's identity after reviewing surveillance footage and conducting investigations.

Loh, who left for Malaysia on Feb 19, was arrested on Feb 24 as he was returning to Singapore via Woodlands checkpoint.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Wen Hsien, argued that there was no reason for Loh to have resorted to violence by assaulting the unarmed victim. Loh's "pre-emptive" strike was a deliberate and calculated act, she said.

Defence counsel Sunil Sudheesan argued that Loh had no intention to silence the victim and that he just wanted to get out.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...helper-in-aborted-burglary-gets-14-years-jail
 

blissquek

Alfrescian
Loyal
Khojabing is unlucky..he was not given a second chance even two of the judges with the new law, think he should not be hanged. The Prosecutor is vicious and for some reasons just want him dead.

Kho Jabing is Dead...there are two parts to this saga.


Part One. Crime and Punishment



..An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.


Nearly everyone will condemn the June 2008 brutal killing of the victim with his skull fractured into 14 parts.

Nearly everyone will have no doubt about his guilt .The due process of the judicial system goes into motion,the initial trail and then with the death sentence handed down, appeals and the final Presidential clemency appeal.


He was given the mandatory death sentence in 2010.

Jabing"s family will accept the fact that Jabing will have to pay with his life for taking away someone else's life.


Rightfully we see justice takes its course with the hangman putting the noose around Jabing's neck and the case comes to a clinical close.


This is the proper account to the victim"s family.



Part Two. - the other perspective - Anguish and delusion.


1. In 2008, Kho Jabing did not set out to murder the China construction worker, Cao Ruyin . He did not know the victim or met the victim before. He did not bring any murder weapon that day. A tree branch was lying nearby and he used it to bash the victim's head.It was not a premeditated murder. The killing wasn't planned beforehand.


In short, it was a robbery attempt that bungled.


2. Then comes the Amendments to the mandatory death penalty regime .It became effective on 1/1/2013. The High Court re-sentenced Kho Jabing to life imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. A life-line was given to Kho Jabing and his family and restore our faith in humanity.


3. Here. the anguish and delusion set in.

Kho was then again re-sentenced on a sentence that was handed down by the High Court.

Of the five judges, two were against the Death sentence. It brings out the basic relevant fact that there is no consensus or total agreement on what is the appropriate sentence. And when the death sentence is again passed down, the second time, Kho Jabing lawyers, Alfred Dodwell and Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss tried valiantly to make their last minute appeal.This is Kho Jabing's rights of Appeal.


4. To Kho Jabing"s family members and his parents, it seems that they have been deluded and tormented when the death sentence is passed the SECOND TIME.Their anguish is prolonged with this torment that Kho will go to see the hangman .It is their false belief that they attached validity to the Amendments to the Mandatory death penalty; and that it would spared their son's life, especially when the death sentence is commuted to life imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.


Perhaps. Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon can define to Kho Jabing's family that the system did not betray them with this false hope, even when his judges differ on the the view what is the appropriate sentence.


This would be the proper account to Kho Jabing's family.
 

ToaPehGong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wow... 14 years for bludgeoning someone to death. It might not be murder but shouldn't it be manslaughter?
 
Top