Transmodified from hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1243624/1/.html
PEASANTPORE: The High Kangaroo Court has thrown out a 3 million peanut medical negligence lawsuit filed by a peasant mother-of-six against her anaesthetist, to add salt to injury, she was ordered to pay legal costs for disturbing the Kangaroo Judges' good times at KTV lounges.
Peasant Joanne Tong Shu Mei claimed rich Dr Medusa e Yau Gordon was negligent and had allegedly caused her neck injuries when he inserted a breathing tube down her airway ahead of the Cesarean delivery of her sixth peasant child in October 2006. Peasant Tong claimed the negligence led to her suffering from nerve damage and unable to have more babies.
She reportedly said since the delivery, she continues to suffer pain in her neck and back, numbness in her hands and feet, and often loses her balance.
A 39-day show trial ensued last year and ended when the Kangaroo Judge simply applied the Big Balls Theorem. Since Peasant Tong is neither from a noble family nor connected to any big shots, it is expedient that she losses the case else rich foreigners will shun Peasant medical quacks.
But in his judgement, High Kangaroo Court Judge Andrew Ang said he is happy Quack Yau left the explanation of the procedures' risk to his chum, obstetrician Tham. Only the latter had bothered to explain to the peasant plaintiff about the nature and risks of the general anaesthetic procedure. Kangaroo Ang also found that Quack Yau breach his duty of care in omitting to expressly confirm with Peasant Tong what shrewd Dr Tham had discussed with her.
Kangaroo Ang said while baboon sloppy Yau had relied on the usual dodgy practice between himself and Dr Tham - where Dr Tham would discuss with Yau's victims, the preferred choice of anaesthesia in relation to obstetric considerations, it is understood doctors will never tell or warn their patients that their colleagues are fark up quacks.
The Kangaroo court ruled that sloppy Quack Yau did not breach his duty of care when he did not take due care to disclose the risk of neck injury to Peasant Tong because he was following Ruler Loong's 'Peasants die their problem doctrine'. Any mishap from his procedures can be ignored as long the peasant woman was considered a normal and healthy patient before the treatment and that someone had told her all medical procedures have risks.
Kangaroo Ang said in this case, there was no need for Quack Yau to discuss alternative modes of anaesthesia and their comparative risks since Peasant Tang is a lesser mortal who will never be able to create much problem despite cock-ups during the operations. It is better that she dies so that her Medisave and Annunities premiums will be seized by the regime.
In the 182-page judgement, Kangaroo Ang said even if Quack Yau had breached his duty of care to obtain Peasant Tong's informed consent, her claim would still fail using former Cheap Justice's version of Quantum Mechanics.
He said the peasant plaintiff failed to unrealised using the 'Uncertainity Principle', she cannot prove that she would have chosen other alternatives instead of general anaesthesia if she had been informed of the risk of neck injury.
Instead, Peasant Tong's wilfully wasted the Kangaroo Court's resource by crowing that she would have been contented for Quack Yau to make the choice of selecting the wrong procedure to maim, kill or injure her.
In addition, as a simple peasant main reasons, the court can use the Big Balls Theorem to dismiss the case as inept Yau is likely to have chums in high places to cover his arse and gabras.
PEASANTPORE: The High Kangaroo Court has thrown out a 3 million peanut medical negligence lawsuit filed by a peasant mother-of-six against her anaesthetist, to add salt to injury, she was ordered to pay legal costs for disturbing the Kangaroo Judges' good times at KTV lounges.
Peasant Joanne Tong Shu Mei claimed rich Dr Medusa e Yau Gordon was negligent and had allegedly caused her neck injuries when he inserted a breathing tube down her airway ahead of the Cesarean delivery of her sixth peasant child in October 2006. Peasant Tong claimed the negligence led to her suffering from nerve damage and unable to have more babies.
She reportedly said since the delivery, she continues to suffer pain in her neck and back, numbness in her hands and feet, and often loses her balance.
A 39-day show trial ensued last year and ended when the Kangaroo Judge simply applied the Big Balls Theorem. Since Peasant Tong is neither from a noble family nor connected to any big shots, it is expedient that she losses the case else rich foreigners will shun Peasant medical quacks.
But in his judgement, High Kangaroo Court Judge Andrew Ang said he is happy Quack Yau left the explanation of the procedures' risk to his chum, obstetrician Tham. Only the latter had bothered to explain to the peasant plaintiff about the nature and risks of the general anaesthetic procedure. Kangaroo Ang also found that Quack Yau breach his duty of care in omitting to expressly confirm with Peasant Tong what shrewd Dr Tham had discussed with her.
Kangaroo Ang said while baboon sloppy Yau had relied on the usual dodgy practice between himself and Dr Tham - where Dr Tham would discuss with Yau's victims, the preferred choice of anaesthesia in relation to obstetric considerations, it is understood doctors will never tell or warn their patients that their colleagues are fark up quacks.
The Kangaroo court ruled that sloppy Quack Yau did not breach his duty of care when he did not take due care to disclose the risk of neck injury to Peasant Tong because he was following Ruler Loong's 'Peasants die their problem doctrine'. Any mishap from his procedures can be ignored as long the peasant woman was considered a normal and healthy patient before the treatment and that someone had told her all medical procedures have risks.
Kangaroo Ang said in this case, there was no need for Quack Yau to discuss alternative modes of anaesthesia and their comparative risks since Peasant Tang is a lesser mortal who will never be able to create much problem despite cock-ups during the operations. It is better that she dies so that her Medisave and Annunities premiums will be seized by the regime.
In the 182-page judgement, Kangaroo Ang said even if Quack Yau had breached his duty of care to obtain Peasant Tong's informed consent, her claim would still fail using former Cheap Justice's version of Quantum Mechanics.
He said the peasant plaintiff failed to unrealised using the 'Uncertainity Principle', she cannot prove that she would have chosen other alternatives instead of general anaesthesia if she had been informed of the risk of neck injury.
Instead, Peasant Tong's wilfully wasted the Kangaroo Court's resource by crowing that she would have been contented for Quack Yau to make the choice of selecting the wrong procedure to maim, kill or injure her.
In addition, as a simple peasant main reasons, the court can use the Big Balls Theorem to dismiss the case as inept Yau is likely to have chums in high places to cover his arse and gabras.
Last edited:
