• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Judge dismisses City Harvest manager's application to hire a Queen's Counsel

Something tells me this Chew guy will take the rap for Kong Hee.

The church will continue, Kong Hee gets acquitted and tells his believers that it was due to God's protection. :rolleyes:

Reminds me of Richard Wan vis-a-vis TT Durai
 
I engage a lawyer to defend me. Be it a normal one or QC. Since when do I need the Court's permission to decide who I can engage? :confused:
 
Die die must also put them behind bars for some time ....

PAPies are always wary of people who are capable of mobilizing the mass especially those already with large flock of devotees.

With over 30,000 devotees permeating into the home of middle and upper middle class Singaporeans. It is a significant force
to be reckon with should it be abused or misdirected!

Kong, with his star power to attract and energize the flock coupled with the Power of God to raise fund is a Clear and Present
Danger to a already weakened PAP.

With an average of 23,256 attendees in 2010. 47.3% of members in City Harvest Church are below the age of 25 years and the
average age of the congregation is 24.

The majority of the church "are young professionals aged 25 to 35" and the church endeavors to build an "ultra-modern, energetic
and upwardly-mobile image"

This class of voters with their net suaveness, proficiency with the new media and their outspokenness is already the tip of the
Achilles' heel for the PAP in the 2006 and 2011 GEs and re-confirmed during the PE's BE.

Remember in 2007 (right after the 2006 GE) both he and Shi Ming Yi were invited for tea? Yes, he was let off, but Shi proceeded to
have breakfast, lunch and dinner at government's holiday resort.

Bear in mind that in 2007, Shi Ming Yi were able to mobilized more than 300,000 devotees at that time.

Also, Ming Yi's group of devotees were less educated and more emotional, therefore, more susceptible to manipulation.

My feeling is that Ming Yi was a brute force and a loose cannon and needed to be taken care off, first!

So, now is the day of …. Kong's reckoning!



Very apt comment, and quite Brilliant analysis. This Kong Hee vs. PAP saga reminds me of events in 1930's Europe.

In 1930's Europe, the masses were being dominated by a religious sect/cult that threatened to enslave them all by use of economic means. Then along came a strong political party headed by a Charismatic leader who took bold and courageous action to wipe out the religious sect/cult.

Similarly, Singapore is going to be saved from the depredations of the ruthless Kong Hee sect/cult by a strong, messianic political party headed by a visonary, messianic leader.
 
Very apt comment, and quite Brilliant analysis. This Kong Hee vs. PAP saga reminds me of events in 1930's Europe.

In 1930's Europe, the masses were being dominated by a religious sect/cult that threatened to enslave them all by use of economic means. Then along came a strong political party headed by a Charismatic leader who took bold and courageous action to wipe out the religious sect/cult.

Similarly, Singapore is going to be saved from the depredations of the ruthless Kong Hee sect/cult by a strong, messianic political party headed by a visonary, messianic leader.

Hi Bro,

Interesting, isn't it?

I always believe it make political sense to entangle and/or honey-trap your potential adversaries. Give them enough ropes to entangle themselves … sit back and wait!
If they don't toil the line, reel them in and hang them by their fallacies.

As noted by scroobal, CHC is 100% Pro PAP, swamped with PAP supporters, civil servants, professionals, etc and yet this could happened under their noses!

What's more, Kong and CHC were given a clean bill of health in 2007 COC's audit.

Yet, just three years after CHC tightening of corporate governance per COC's recommendations, they unearthed this case!

Investigation into this case only commenced on 31 May 2010 after "persistent whistle blowing" ...

Notice the date? Just prior to 2011 GE! Coincidence? Sending a subtle message to CHC
(Kong's) followers:confused:

I honestly believe there is a potential for political conspiracy!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top