"journalist" who said Russia would not invade now offers further expert analysis....

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
65,704
Points
113

Gwynne Dyer: Russia will not invade Ukraine​




I must admit that I googled the plot of the 1997 film Wag the Dog before starting to write this. It’s a dark comedy about a U.S. president facing a sex scandal whose staff invent a completely fictional war in the Balkans to draw the media’s attention elsewhere. But sex scandals are not the Biden administration’s style.

Yet there is certainly something weird going on. In only two weeks a full-scale panic about Russia invading Ukraine has been sold to the Western media, and normally sensible journalists and analysts are talking about war – with Russia, of all places.

All right, if you read the small print they are really saying that the Russians are going to invade Ukraine and that the United States and its Nato allies won’t fight to stop them. Ukraine is not part of Nato and they’ll sadly have to watch it go under. But they’ll be very, very cross, and they’ll sanction the hell out of Russia. So there!

This story about Russian forces massing on Ukraine’s borders for an invasion first emerged from U.S. intelligence circles in mid-November. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky realized that it could mean more American arms for Ukraine, and soon he and his people were singing from the same song-sheet.

The 92,000 Russian troops that are allegedly now near the Ukrainian border is really not a very impressive a number, given that the Ukrainian army is 255,000 strong, but the same U.S. intelligence sources say the Russians plan to raise the number on Ukraine’s border to 175,000 troops in January and go for broke. How do they know that? Sorry, it’s a secret.

Stop focusing on the troop numbers. If an invasion were really scheduled for January, the forces could be anywhere in Russia’s vast expanse right now and still show up in time for the party next month. Any extra Russian troops ‘near’ Ukraine now are there as a symbolic gesture, not as part of a military plan.

Symbolism and historical stereotypes are what this is all about, and the dominant stereotype in Putin’s mind is the fact that practically everybody on the ‘A’ list of would-be world conquerors has invaded Russia, from the Golden Horde (Mongols) to Napoleon to Hitler. That sort of thing is bound to leave a mark.

Putin, like any educated Russian, therefore feels uneasy about the way that Nato has crept closer and closer to Russia. The military frontier with Nato was a ‘safe’ 1,500 km west of Moscow during the Cold War, but afterwards it moved.

When some of the former Soviet ‘satellites’ in eastern Europe joined Nato in 1999, that brought Nato forces to within 800 km of Russia’s western frontier. Then the western-backed non-violent overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian president for a second time in 2014 created the possibility that Ukraine itself might also join Nato.
Moscow is only a six-hour drive up highway E101 from Ukraine’s northern border (although tanks would take a little longer). Nato has been alert enough to Russian sensitivity on this topic not to invite Ukraine to join, but the prospect does weigh heavily on Putin’s mind.

So Putin wants a written promise that Ukraine will never join the Western alliance. Nato countries would never allow it anyway, precisely because there is some risk that it could drag them into a war with Russia, but Biden is unwilling to put it in writing.

Both men are of an age where a fundamental change of mind is unlikely. On the other hand, as veterans of the Cold War they both understand that Russia and the United States must never do anything that risks bringing them into a direct military conflict.

That is the best possible guarantee that this nonsense will not end badly. If you want another, it is that the Western sanctions which would follow really would cripple the Russian economy. They might even undermine Putin’s still significant popularity in Russia itself. There may be all kinds of threatening gestures, but Russia will not invade Ukraine.
 
stuff.co.nz


Ukraine invasion: 10 predictions for what lies ahead​


Gwynne Dyer

6-7 minutes




Gwynne Dyer is a Canadian journalist and commentator on international affairs, based in Britain.
OPINION: Now that Russian President Vladimir Putin has invaded Ukraine and foreclosed his and everybody else’s other options, certain aspects of the near future have become clear. So have some aspects of the longer run.
Here are 10 predictions, made with varying degrees of confidence.
1. Ukraine’s organised military forces won’t be able to fight for long. Its armed forces are smaller and less well-equipped than the Russian invasion force, they are being attacked simultaneously from the north, east and south, and above all they lack air cover.
Russian cruise missiles have already struck most Ukrainian air bases and command centres, and Ukranian forces in the field will be cut up into small groups, surrounded and overwhelmed. Arming civilians won’t help: it will just get them killed. Organised combat will probably be over in a week, although fighting in the cities could last a little longer.
Russian President Vladimir Putin addresses his country as the invasion of Ukraine gets under way.

AP
Russian President Vladimir Putin addresses his country as the invasion of Ukraine gets under way.
READ MORE:
* Putin spreads narrative that Ukraine poses a national security risk for Russia
* Ukraine-Russia: What to know about the escalating crisis
* Why Vladimir Putin is so confident in his Ukraine strategy – he has a trump card in China

2. There will be an underground resistance movement at least for a while, but don’t imagine Ukrainians are going to be the new Viet Cong. This is an urban society, and the resistance will rely on ambushes, assassinations and IEDs. The Russians will call it “terrorism”.
3. Putin says, “we do not intend to occupy Ukraine”, but of course they will. The only question is whether the Russians will stop at Dnieper river (plus Kiev, on the west bank), or take the western half of the country too.
Resistance will be stronger in the west, where Ukrainian nationalism has deeper roots, but Putin’s denial of the legitimacy of the Ukrainian state and indeed of a separate Ukrainian identity means he can’t really leave the west out. The logic of his argument is that all the people on this “ancient Russian land” must be re-submerged in a greater Russian identity.
Ukrainian troops riding on armoured personnel carriers in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine, as the country responds to a Russian invasion.

Vadim Ghirda/AP
Ukrainian troops riding on armoured personnel carriers in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine, as the country responds to a Russian invasion.
4. Russia’s civilian and military intelligence services, the FSB and GRU, will have lists of Ukrainians who are to be arrested: certainly thousands, maybe tens of thousands. Some of them may be killed, but we won’t hear about that if it happens. A lot more people who fear they might be on those lists will flee west.
5. Several hundred thousand other people will also flee west just because they don’t want to live under military occupation and Russification. It could be more, if Russia leaves the border open for a while to get rid of the people who are likely to resent their presence most.
6. The border between Nato members and the countries Putin controls (Russia, Belarus and Ukraine) will be remilitarised, and defence budgets will rise in Germany and eastern European countries. However, as in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968, there will be no Nato military action to counter the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Why? Nuclear weapons.
7. Will a new Cold War spread across the world? No, because post-Soviet Russia is too small and weak to hold up its end of it. Moreover, there is no real ideological conflict: democracy is an ideology, but dictatorship isn’t. At worst, there will be a Cool War in the North Atlantic/European region.
8. Will Putin get away with it? For a while, yes. There will be more Western sanctions against Russia, of course, but he has build up a big war-chest (US$600 billion in reserves) and outside the big cities Russians are still very “patriotic” and pretty gullible. But Putin’s long-term project of re-Russification is foredoomed: there’s just no popular enthusiasm for it.
Smoke rise from an air defence base in the aftermath of an apparent Russian strike in Mariupol, Ukraine.

Evgeniy Maloletka/AP
Smoke rise from an air defence base in the aftermath of an apparent Russian strike in Mariupol, Ukraine.
9. Will Ukraine regain its independence? Not while Putin is alive (he’s 69) unless there is a palace coup in the Kremlin. The Russians will install a puppet government in Kiev, but will find it too unstable to let them bring their troops home again. When Putin is gone, however, Ukraine will have a chance to regain its freedom. So may Russia.
10. Will Donald Trump win the 2024 US election? Maybe not. His fanboy adulation of Putin goes down well with the hardcore MAGA crowd, who admire the Russian dictator more than they do Joe Biden, but praising Putin’s “smart move” in invading Ukraine will not play well with most Americans if their country is caught up in a confrontation with Russia.
And one more: Has the world “changed forever”, as the pundits love to say? No, of course not, but this is a very big deal, and a hell of a lot has changed.
 
It is not an invasion. It is a peacekeeping mission. Kudos on Putin for standing up to bullies and hypocrites. :thumbsup:
 
George Yeo also mentioned that Russia will not invade Ukraine
 
It is not an invasion. It is a peacekeeping mission. Kudos on Putin for standing up to bullies and hypocrites. :thumbsup:

Putin is protecting the political and cultural rights of the Russian minorities there. Xi Jinping should do the same for the Malaysian Chinese. :wink:
 
Putin is protecting the political and cultural rights of the Russian minorities there. Xi Jinping should do the same for the Malaysian Chinese. :wink:
Is Malaysia shelling their chinks? Egg shells may be. :laugh:
 
Putin is protecting the political and cultural rights of the Russian minorities there. Xi Jinping should do the same for the Malaysian Chinese. :wink:
whatever hardships the Chinese Malaysians are facing, there's no guarantee that Xi's involvement will make it better for them. In all likelihood, his heavy handed approach will cause even more trouble.
 
whatever hardships the Chinese Malaysians are facing, there's no guarantee that Xi's involvement will make it better for them. In all likelihood, his heavy handed approach will cause even more trouble.
as a fellow Malaysian, I take it you'd rather be arguing with someone than not have someone to argue with at all.
You told whoami that you are ex Malaysian and now you said you are Malaysian. That’s why never can trust any Malaysian claiming to be Singaporean until see the red passport. Now ownself busted your own lies just like Jeremy Quek aka Glockman aka cottonmouth busted own lies of he attacked me because I attacked him. You are a Malaysian liar bastard using evil filthy lies viciously attacking me a virgin as a slut whore mistress for years because you are a Malaysian that dislike me speaking the truth. Pui your filthy Malaysian whore mother phua cb!

View attachment 136691
 
really? Chamberlain also said Hitler won't spread his menace.
 
Back
Top