• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Japs Dumped Fukujima Nuke Water reached USA Coast! Soon SG & Global!

ChemWarHead

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.11alive.com/news/fukushima-radiation-detected-in-tillamook-bay-gold-beach/367136967


Fukushima radiation detected on US West Coast
Tracy Loew , Statesman Journal , KGW 9:39 AM. EST December 09, 2016

CONNECT TWEET LINKEDIN GOOGLE+ PINTEREST

For the first time, seaborne radiation from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster has been detected on the West Coast of the United States.

Cesium-134, the so-called fingerprint of Fukushima, was measured in seawater samples taken from Tillamook Bay and Gold Beach in Oregon, researchers from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution are reporting.

Because of its short half-life, cesium-134 can only have come from Fukushima.

Also for the first time, cesium-134 has been detected in a Canadian salmon, the Fukushima InFORM project, led by University of Victoria chemical oceanographer Jay Cullen, is reporting.

In both cases, levels are extremely low, the researchers said, and don’t pose a danger to humans or the environment.

Massive amounts of contaminated water were released from the crippled nuclear plant following a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. More radiation was released to the air, then fell to the sea.

Woods Hole chemical oceanographer Ken Buesseler runs a crowd-funded, citizen science seawater sampling project that has tracked the radiation plume as it slowly makes its way across the Pacific Ocean.

The Oregon samples, marking the first time cesium-134 has been detected on U.S. shores, were taken in January and February of 2016 and later analyzed. They each measured 0.3 becquerels per cubic meter of cesium-134.

Buesseler’s team previously had found the isotope in a sample of seawater taken from a dock on Vancouver Island, B.C., marking its landfall in North America.

Meanwhile, in Canada, Cullen leads the InFORM project to assess radiological risks to that country’s oceans following the nuclear disaster. It is a partnership of a dozen academic, government and non-profit organizations, including Woods Hole.

Last month, the group reported that a single sockeye salmon, sampled from Okanagan Lake in the summer of 2015, had tested positive for cesium-134.

The level was more than 1,000 times lower than the action level set by Health Canada, and is no significant risk to consumers, Cullen said.

Buesseler’s most recent samples off the West Coast also are showing higher-than background levels of cesium-137, another Fukushima isotope that already is present in the world's oceans because of nuclear testing in the 1950s and 1960s.

Those results will become more important in tracking the radiation plume, Buesseler said, because the short half-life of cesium-134 makes it harder to detect as time goes on.

Cesium-134 has a half-life of two years, meaning it’s down to a fraction of what it was five years ago, he said. Cesium-137 has a 30-year half-life.

A recent InFORM analysis of Buesseler’s data concluded that concentrations of cesium-137 have increased considerably in the central northeast Pacific, although they still are at levels that pose no concern.

“It appears that the plume has spread throughout this vast area from Alaska to California,” the scientists wrote.

They estimated that the plume is moving toward the coast at roughly twice the speed of a garden snail. Radiation levels have not yet peaked.

“As the contamination plume progresses towards our coast we expect levels closer to shore to increase over the coming year,” Cullen said.

Even that peak won’t be a health concern, Buesseler said. But the models will help scientists model ocean currents in the future.

That could prove important if there is another disaster or accident at the Fukushima plant, which houses more than a thousand huge steel tanks of contaminated water and where hundreds of tons of molten fuel remain inside the reactors.

In a worst-case scenario, the fuel would melt through steel-reinforced concrete containment vessels into the ground, uncontrollably spreading radiation into the surrounding soil and groundwater and eventually into the sea.

“That’s the type of thing where people are still concerned, as am I, about what could happen,” Buesseler said.

Scientists now know it would take four to five years for any further contamination from the plant to reach the West Coast.

[email protected], 503-399-6779 or follow at Twitter.com/Tracy_Loew
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
best is to illustrate with a simulation....

image.jpg
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
actual measurements off the west coast are proving the simulations several years ago correct. what that means is that fukushima is still fuking with the pacific ocean. radiation via the ocean is not contained. don't need tiongs to threaten us. japs will kill us all.
 

bodycells

Alfrescian
Loyal
The world has technology to clean up the radiation in the ocean. It depends on the politicians if they wanna use it.. It is all due to the global elites.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
oy vey,one little nuclear reactor isnt going to poison the whole ocean,u probably get more radiation from the sun and the background environment everyday then u do from any fukushima fallout as long as u are more than 25km away from it....even if u drink the contaminated sea water from east coast or australia for 1000 years its not going to accumulate enough to make a difference.

just stay away from japan and dont eat any sushi or anything made in japan.
 
Last edited:

bodycells

Alfrescian
Loyal
oy vey,one little nuclear reactor isnt going to poison the whole ocean,u probably get more radiation from the sun and the background environment everyday then u do from any fukushima fallout as long as u are more than 25km away from it....even if u drink the contaminated sea water from east coast or australia for 1000 years its not going to accumulate enough to make a difference.

Motherhood statements... Sinkie sinkie..
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Motherhood statements... Sinkie sinkie..

its called science moron.try using ur brains for once on this site will ya?

a banana has 18.9 Becquerel of radiation......that seawater has less than 0.3 Becquerel per cubic meter.a banana is 54 times more radioactive than the seawater.a chess xray has 3.6 millirems of radiation,thats equivalent to 810 bananas of radiation.u have to eat 810 bananas to get the equivalent dose of radiation from one chess xray.that means to get the equivalent of one chest xray u have to drink 43,700 cubic meter of seawater or 43,000,000 liters of seawater.
 
Last edited:
Top