- Joined
- Jan 8, 2011
- Messages
- 3,657
- Points
- 0
and Foo Mee Har Minister of Finance ?
That would be 'radical change', in my view.
Pinky says he has opted for a radical change in the new Cabinet line-up. But didn't Pinky also say that all the retiring ministers, including the 3 stooges - WKS, MBT and RL - wanted to leave the Cabinet even before the Election but Pinky wanted them to stay ?
Is the 'radical change' forced on Pinky because it was the decision of the retiring ministers ? If the retiring ministers had indeed decided to leave the Cabinet before Election, then Pinky is not entitled to say that he opted for radical change.
What if the same ministers had no intention to leave the Cabinet ? Would Pinky have the balls to drop these ministers ?
The statement from Pinky that he wanted a radical change is contradictory. The retirement of the ministers is either Pinky's decision or the ministers' decisions. Pinky cannot have it both ways.
That would be 'radical change', in my view.
Pinky says he has opted for a radical change in the new Cabinet line-up. But didn't Pinky also say that all the retiring ministers, including the 3 stooges - WKS, MBT and RL - wanted to leave the Cabinet even before the Election but Pinky wanted them to stay ?
Is the 'radical change' forced on Pinky because it was the decision of the retiring ministers ? If the retiring ministers had indeed decided to leave the Cabinet before Election, then Pinky is not entitled to say that he opted for radical change.
What if the same ministers had no intention to leave the Cabinet ? Would Pinky have the balls to drop these ministers ?
The statement from Pinky that he wanted a radical change is contradictory. The retirement of the ministers is either Pinky's decision or the ministers' decisions. Pinky cannot have it both ways.