Serious It's Official! Oppies Are Free Riders! Fucking Assholes! Vote For Oppie Losers But Expect The Rest Of Us To Vote Responsibly For PAP!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
1599055366756.png



SINGAPORE — Worker’s Party chief Pritam Singh took exception to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s description of opposition voters as “free riders”, as the Leader of the Opposition and the PM crossed swords in the new Parliament for the first time.

Speaking in Parliament on Wednesday (2 September) in lieu of his annual National Day Rally speech, Lee was critical of the mindset that it is safe to vote for the opposition as the People’s Action Party (PAP) will form the government anyway – a strategy deployed by several opposition parties in the recent General Election.

The PM cited a middle-aged voter who had asked Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean during the July election campaign, “Mr Teo, is it true? My friends tell me it’s ok to vote for the opposition. Because the government will still be in charge...and the PAP will work even harder for you. You get everything they promised, and two persons working for you instead of one.”

After his speech, Lee told the House, “So if you think that government is doing the wrong thing...by all means, vote the government out, put a new government in, change the government, change the policy. But if you say, vote against the government because somebody else will look after getting the PAP government, you just become a free rider.”

In response, Singh said, “I don't think the residents of Aljunied, Hougang for 30 years now, and even Sengkang, as a result of the last election, would appreciate being called free riders. They're not free riders.”

The WP chief added, “We’re not just letting the other guy, the government of the day, do something. We've got to do what we have to do. We've got to run the town council, which is why Mr Lee Kuan Yew conceived of the town councils in the first place. Because if you want to move forward in the system as an opposition Member of Parliament, you've got to prove your worth in the town council.

“And we've had growing pains, I'm not going to deny that. But if we were bungling things up, I wouldn't be here today. My team wouldn't be here today.”

Lee then clarified that he had been using the economists’ definition of a free rider, which refers to a situation whereby people use or overuse a shared resource without paying their fair share for it or not at all. “But if you say, vote for for me, somebody else will vote for the PAP, and therefore the PAP will be the government, that, the economists will call a free rider. It means that you're taking advantage of somebody else who's doing their duty of electing a government for the nation.”

The Prime Minister added, “And you're not doing your part, expressing your true views and preference, as a voter whom you want to be the next government. And if everybody takes that attitude, then you're going to end up with a government which you don't want.”

‘I’m not desperate for power, Prime Minister’
Alluding to the residents of Aljunied, Hougang and Sengkang - all wards held by the WP - Singh said, “The residents, the voters of these constituencies, put their faith in us. Because they know an opposition in Parliament is ultimately good for Singapore.”

The 43-year-old spoke of his “huge burden” as WP chief: ensuring that the party picks the right candidates who can follow through if elected. “I'm not desperate for power, Prime Minister. But we've got to get good people, if we want to bring this country forward...We have many, many more miles to go. But we're not chasing a destination. We intend to do right by Singapore.”

Acknowledging “his motivations, his passion, his desire to do right by Singapore”, Lee asked, “So supposing that the PSP (Progress Singapore Party) had been as persuasive as Mr Pritam Singh, and SDP (Singapore Democratic Party) had been as persuasive as Mr Pritam Singh, and more voters had taken such an attitude, where would Singapore be? Is that the right outcome for Singapore?”

He added, “Elections are not just about the town council, they're also about electing the government for the country. And that's necessary for people to bear firmly in mind.”

Earlier, Lee was also critical of Singh’s assertion that if there is a change of government, a new party will be able to run Singapore equally well, thanks to its excellent public service.

Conceding that in such a scenario, the new government would be able to “fly straight and level for some time”, Lee nevertheless charged, “I think that's not being honest. In that case, we can dismiss all the ministers. They can go on leave, we don't need ministers, anybody can be a minister. But you need to run a system which is finely tuned and capable, you need a very capable hand at the top.”

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pritam-si...-not-free-riders-says-wp-chief-132207453.html
 
Free rider seems to be the pappies themselves...look at pinky..how much he work n how much is he getting paid? Wat about his husband? CEO of temasick n soo much time to post on social media? Wat about the competence of the pappies? They worth their salt?
 
How people wants to vote is none of PAP's business. People can think and judge for themselves. As much as PAP wants to be a nanny to Singaporeans, it just shows how much it is afraid of losing its controlling power over the people. It is Singaporeans' legal right to vote for the opposition to make PAP work harder. If PAP finds it tough, they can always quit.
 
Last edited:
Lanjiao Loong's pinky shirt drenched with his armpits sweat. Parleement aircon not working?
 
By labeling Oppos as free riders, Lanjiao Loong still feeling tulan he lost 2 GRCs when he thought the ground is super sweet for a total PAP domination.
 
Fuck the PAP, what has this current batch of MIW achieved? The dilution of Singaporean identity, the lost of the kampung spirit.
So what if the successes of current Singapore is intricately tied with the PIONEER batch of PAP leaders? The current batch of suckers are just FREE RIDERS of the successes of their predecesors, aren’t they?
KNNBCCB 做贼喊抓贼。
I voted the WP because I want the PAP to be opposition, that’s when PAP performed very well, at least in my memory.
 
It's official and Loong is like his father. This old habit did die off following the demise of LKY. Instead, the name-calling and labelling is still going strong. This guy (Loong) has none of the magnanimity of a leader nor possess any quality of a good leader. He is just having it good simply because his father is LKY. Talk about free rrider.
 
CB , PAPigs make covid situation worse in sg , although whole world been hit with it.We are a small country and can get so many ppl infected wih the country , they think they do a good job? CB look around who is holding a job now, not locals, why don they publish how many local and PR n foreigners lost a job.Don alway use the word resident, think we stupid.Its already ao worse n a new government from opposition will hv to come in to clear PAPigs shit and more skeletons in xupboards will be reveal.sad....country run by incapable PAPigs
 
yeah , call me free-rider or sucker all you want.
if you are a sucker you are a sucker.
Don;t always call out your father and tell us how much good he has did to Singaporean.
Yr-2020, the question is how much good you did and will be doing for citizen and not for your own , your kaki and for the foreigner.
lighting will struck on you even if you gain nothing but with evil heart.
 
Free rider seems to be the pappies themselves...look at pinky..how much he work n how much is he getting paid? Wat about his husband? CEO of temasick n soo much time to post on social media? Wat about the competence of the pappies? They worth their salt?
Our Dear PM can look around all his MPs, he could easily identify many of them are free riders, elected through GRC system. After elected, absent from Parliament sessions, keep quite or talked meaningless things, such as advised Sinkies to work 2 jobs.
 
Free rider seems to be the pappies themselves...look at pinky..how much he work n how much is he getting paid? Wat about his husband? CEO of temasick n soo much time to post on social media? Wat about the competence of the pappies? They worth their salt?
Free riders are the ones sitting behind Loong while he lecturing Pritam and oppie voters. :cautious:
 
Our Dear PM can look around all his MPs, he could easily identify many of them are free riders, elected through GRC system. After elected, absent from Parliament sessions, keep quite or talked meaningless things, such as advised Sinkies to work 2 jobs.
That is why the opposition needs to bring this up and hit hard. But alas a weakling answer from bayi.
 
the two person working for you idea is stupid but PAP started it. PAP should remove their grassroot organizations from the WP constituencies. WP has the rights to run them without PAP interference. LHL should walk the talk and stop fucking around.
 
View attachment 90080


SINGAPORE — Worker’s Party chief Pritam Singh took exception to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s description of opposition voters as “free riders”, as the Leader of the Opposition and the PM crossed swords in the new Parliament for the first time.

Speaking in Parliament on Wednesday (2 September) in lieu of his annual National Day Rally speech, Lee was critical of the mindset that it is safe to vote for the opposition as the People’s Action Party (PAP) will form the government anyway – a strategy deployed by several opposition parties in the recent General Election.

The PM cited a middle-aged voter who had asked Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean during the July election campaign, “Mr Teo, is it true? My friends tell me it’s ok to vote for the opposition. Because the government will still be in charge...and the PAP will work even harder for you. You get everything they promised, and two persons working for you instead of one.”

After his speech, Lee told the House, “So if you think that government is doing the wrong thing...by all means, vote the government out, put a new government in, change the government, change the policy. But if you say, vote against the government because somebody else will look after getting the PAP government, you just become a free rider.”

In response, Singh said, “I don't think the residents of Aljunied, Hougang for 30 years now, and even Sengkang, as a result of the last election, would appreciate being called free riders. They're not free riders.”

The WP chief added, “We’re not just letting the other guy, the government of the day, do something. We've got to do what we have to do. We've got to run the town council, which is why Mr Lee Kuan Yew conceived of the town councils in the first place. Because if you want to move forward in the system as an opposition Member of Parliament, you've got to prove your worth in the town council.

“And we've had growing pains, I'm not going to deny that. But if we were bungling things up, I wouldn't be here today. My team wouldn't be here today.”

Lee then clarified that he had been using the economists’ definition of a free rider, which refers to a situation whereby people use or overuse a shared resource without paying their fair share for it or not at all. “But if you say, vote for for me, somebody else will vote for the PAP, and therefore the PAP will be the government, that, the economists will call a free rider. It means that you're taking advantage of somebody else who's doing their duty of electing a government for the nation.”

The Prime Minister added, “And you're not doing your part, expressing your true views and preference, as a voter whom you want to be the next government. And if everybody takes that attitude, then you're going to end up with a government which you don't want.”

‘I’m not desperate for power, Prime Minister’
Alluding to the residents of Aljunied, Hougang and Sengkang - all wards held by the WP - Singh said, “The residents, the voters of these constituencies, put their faith in us. Because they know an opposition in Parliament is ultimately good for Singapore.”

The 43-year-old spoke of his “huge burden” as WP chief: ensuring that the party picks the right candidates who can follow through if elected. “I'm not desperate for power, Prime Minister. But we've got to get good people, if we want to bring this country forward...We have many, many more miles to go. But we're not chasing a destination. We intend to do right by Singapore.”

Acknowledging “his motivations, his passion, his desire to do right by Singapore”, Lee asked, “So supposing that the PSP (Progress Singapore Party) had been as persuasive as Mr Pritam Singh, and SDP (Singapore Democratic Party) had been as persuasive as Mr Pritam Singh, and more voters had taken such an attitude, where would Singapore be? Is that the right outcome for Singapore?”

He added, “Elections are not just about the town council, they're also about electing the government for the country. And that's necessary for people to bear firmly in mind.”

Earlier, Lee was also critical of Singh’s assertion that if there is a change of government, a new party will be able to run Singapore equally well, thanks to its excellent public service.

Conceding that in such a scenario, the new government would be able to “fly straight and level for some time”, Lee nevertheless charged, “I think that's not being honest. In that case, we can dismiss all the ministers. They can go on leave, we don't need ministers, anybody can be a minister. But you need to run a system which is finely tuned and capable, you need a very capable hand at the top.”

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/pritam-si...-not-free-riders-says-wp-chief-132207453.html

Tannie, u getting very sore these days keep scolding people here.

Biz down join blame customers is it?
 
Back
Top