- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 6,464
- Points
- 0
Blame the Fed
Two big disappointments in the recent recovery have been the sluggish job growth and the continued underemployment of many people who had solidly middle class jobs before the recession but are now struggling to make ends meet with much lower incomes. Rick Newman recently detailed how routine jobs which used to help populate the middle class are disappearing.
Essentially, lots of low-wage jobs are hard to automate and the same is true for most high-skill jobs. Unfortunately, many middle class jobs are “routine” according to the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank and can be automated. Thus, machines replace people and we get a jobless recovery. What is missing from this story is the villain, but I can reveal its identity here.
While many are bemoaning the lack of job growth in the recovery, policy makers need to understand that they are a large part of the cause.
We may be moving toward what some are calling a dumbbell economy where most of the jobs are at either the lower or upper end of the income spectrum, with few jobs left in the middle class.
The idea is that yard work, stocking store shelves, and similar jobs do not easily lend themselves to automation. Ditto for neurosurgeons or movie stars.
However, rule-based jobs like accounting and many intermediation-type jobs (travel agent, bank teller, even some stock brokers) can now be replaced by computers.
Additionally, manufacturing jobs that were another common route to a middle class income are continually under pressure from automation as every manufacturer strives to produce more using fewer employees.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffrey...-are-disappearing-and-the-fed-is-the-culprit/
Two big disappointments in the recent recovery have been the sluggish job growth and the continued underemployment of many people who had solidly middle class jobs before the recession but are now struggling to make ends meet with much lower incomes. Rick Newman recently detailed how routine jobs which used to help populate the middle class are disappearing.
Essentially, lots of low-wage jobs are hard to automate and the same is true for most high-skill jobs. Unfortunately, many middle class jobs are “routine” according to the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank and can be automated. Thus, machines replace people and we get a jobless recovery. What is missing from this story is the villain, but I can reveal its identity here.
While many are bemoaning the lack of job growth in the recovery, policy makers need to understand that they are a large part of the cause.
We may be moving toward what some are calling a dumbbell economy where most of the jobs are at either the lower or upper end of the income spectrum, with few jobs left in the middle class.
The idea is that yard work, stocking store shelves, and similar jobs do not easily lend themselves to automation. Ditto for neurosurgeons or movie stars.
However, rule-based jobs like accounting and many intermediation-type jobs (travel agent, bank teller, even some stock brokers) can now be replaced by computers.
Additionally, manufacturing jobs that were another common route to a middle class income are continually under pressure from automation as every manufacturer strives to produce more using fewer employees.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffrey...-are-disappearing-and-the-fed-is-the-culprit/