Israeli IDF = Nazi Army of Middle East should be dealt with by world like Nazi

[yellowarse]

Aren't they given a golden opportunities to accept the final implementation of Oslo at Camp David? They turned down and choose confrontation.

Golden opportunities? It was implicit that the Oslo Accords by the parties (Rabin, Arafat, Clinton) would lead to a Palestinian State with pre-1967 borders. But the Israelis were never sincere about implementing Oslo and they effectively scuppered the deal when they allowed settlements to grow unabated as well as expand the militarization of the occupied terrorities.

Typical Israeli modus operandi: promise one thing to ease international pressure, quietly pursue the opposite objectives.

In Netanyahu's own words:

In a 2001 video, Netanyahu, reportedly unaware he was being recorded, said: "They asked me before the election if I'd honor [the Oslo accords]... I said I would, but [that] I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue."[SUP][9][/SUP][SUP][10][/SUP] Netanyahu then explained how he conditioned his signing of the 1997 Hebron agreement on American consent that there be no withdrawals from "specified military locations", and insisted he be allowed to specify which areas constituted a "military location"—such as the whole of the Jordan Valley. "Why is that important? Because from that moment on I stopped the Oslo Accords", Netanyahu affirmed.[SUP][11][/SUP]

 

[yellowarse]

There were no MOU signed because none of the Arab Muslims except Egypt want peace with Israel. Also, Israel gave Egypt a big piece of land for them to sign.

Says who? The Oslo accords signed by Rabin and Arafat and Clinton were targeted at the formation of a Palestinian state on pre-1967 borders. Guess who saboed it?

 

[yellowarse]

Deliberate killing of innocent is a crime but not so if it a result of enemy using human shield.Then it the party that uses civilian as human shield that needs to bear the responsibility.

Don't be so gullibly taken in by the Jewish-dominated media lah. When IDF shells and bombs UN shelters and schools and homes, and their soldiers open fire deliberately on kids and women, it does strain credulity a fair bit to keep on insisting on the human shield myth.

Take a walk along the streets of Gaza and see how congested it is. There's practically no space to set aside for a 'military zone'. 2 million people living cheek-by-jowl in squalor on a piece of land half the size of Singapore with no high-rise buildings. You want to launch a rocket, you do it from any available open space or back alley, which invariably will be less than 50 yards from a house or mosque or school or refugee camp.

---

Israel-Gaza conflict: The myth of Hamas’s human shields

What used to be a three-storey house had been turned into debris sunk into a deep crater with twisted steel rods jutting out. Twenty-six people were killed in the mostly deadly air-strike so far in this bloody conflict. Twenty-four of them were from one family, the Abu Jamaa.

Around the same time that attack was taking place on Sunday evening, Benjamin Netanyahu was charging Hamas on TV with using “human shields” to gather “telegenically dead Palestinians for their cause”. It has long been the Israeli case that the militants cynically and deliberately carry out attacks and store weapons in residential areas and have also stopped people living there from evacuating homes when fighting breaks out.


There have been instances in the 13 days of the current war when the Israelis have sought to provide evidence proving their case. After warplanes targeted the al-Farouq mosque, near the Nuseirat refugee camp, for instance, the military issued aerial photographs which, it stated, showed that the building was being used to store rockets. We have also had the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, announcing that it had discovered 20 rockets hidden in one of its disuse schools in a “flagrant violation” of international law. And rockets are seen to be regularly fired from stretches of open ground close to homes.

Are militants also deliberately placing themselves in residences which are then attacked? On the day that Al-Farouq was attacked, the Israeli military also carried out a missile strike on a home for the handicapped in Beit Lahiya, killing two disabled residents and injuring four others. A neighbour claimed that a member of the Islamic Jihad group and his wife had also lived in the building; but he could provide no names or dates for this.

Jamilla Alaiwa, a 59 year old social worker who founded the home 24 years ago told me that this was categorically untrue. “If the Israelis have proof of this let them make it public. There was no one from Islamic Jihad or Hamas living there. We are not involved in politics.” The Israeli military stated they were investigating what happened; their conclusions have not reached Gaza. Were they, perhaps, fed false information?


Some Gazans have admitted that they were afraid of criticizing Hamas, but none have said they had been forced by the organisation to stay in places of danger and become unwilling human-shields. The Bani Sobeila area, near Khan Younis, where the Abu Jamaa deaths took place received leaflets dropped from the air last week warning them to leave.


But almost all stayed. One reason for that was many of the houses belonged to the Abu Jamaa clan who felt there was safety in staying together. Another reason was given by a neighbour, Abdullah al-Daweish: “Where do we go to? Some people moved from the outer edge of Khan Younis to Khan Younis centre after Israelis told them to, then the centre got bombed. People have moved from this area to Gaza City, and Gaza City has been bombed. It’s not Hamas who is ordering us in this, it’s the Israelis.”

Why did they think the house targeted? “We don’t know,” said Saied Abu Jamaa, a cousin who was in his home next door when the blast took place. “Tawfiq, who is the head of the family, is a policeman, but why should he and his family and his neighbours die for that?” Tawfiq Abu Jamaa, 40, distraught figure in a brown jellabiya at the funeral was also at a loss to understand why he had lost his wife and eight children. The sole survivor has Nour, a son of four.


There were 10 recently destroyed buildings on the half-hour drive from Khan Younis to Shujaiya, a town where 90 people had been killed in a 24 hours, an onslaught condemned by the Palestinian government of Mahmoud Abbas as a “heinous massacre”: and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon as “ an atrocious action”.


Members of families who owned six of the buildings had moved in with relations and neighbours in the area. Their reason for staying behind was primarily because there was, they said, nowhere else to go. There were also declarations about not giving up one’s land, not giving in to invaders.


There was denial of coercion by Hamas. “I am not going to go because I can do something Hamas cannot do”, maintained Nabil al-Masri. “I know from times before that if Israeli soldiers get into an empty house they will ruin it on purpose. Hamas cannot stop them going into my house if we leave, but, by staying here we can try to make sure that doesn’t happen.”
Hamas can, however, be accused of making people complacent, repeatedly stating in the media that the Israeli warnings were psychological games and asking the population to ignore them. Some mentioned this as a reason for staying behind; returning home having initially left.


The counter-argument to that was the need to prevent panic spreading. Almost 85,000 people have been on the move, overwhelming the shelters set up by the UN by sheer numbers. Classrooms meant for 30 now hold up to 70, one typical example was the Girls Preparatory Secondary School, at a suburb of Beit Lahiya in the north, with a capacity of 800 which has taken in 1600. Homes of relatives, a traditional source of refuge, are also feeling the strain.

Yasir Hamidi had six additional mouths to feed, along with his family of four, once the bombing began; five more relatives had joined since the ground invasion. His salary from the Ministry of Health stopped even before the conflict started because Gaza’s Hamas administration is bankrupt. “The family members brought some money, but they had to leave almost everything else behind: we are living on my savings, but it will not last for long. After that, who knows?” Mr Hamidi spread his hands in resignation.


Gazans point out that the outside world remains largely unaware just how small and confined the place is – just 25 miles long and just a few miles wide. It is blocked in by closed borders to Israel in the north and east and Egypt in the south. There is no route out by the sea to the west with an Israeli naval blockade. Getting to travel abroad is an excruciatingly long process.


This may be due to Hamas and Islamic Jihad exporting violence, as Israel and Egypt claim, but it is the increasingly large percentage of the 1.7 million population being pushed by the violence into the already heavily congested centre, who are suffering as the relentless bombings and shootings continue.
At the funeral of the Abu Jamaa family, as another body in a shroud was lowered into the grave, Saied, the cousin said: “ That is the only escape many of us will have from here.”

 

[escher]

Says who? The Oslo accords signed by Rabin and Arafat and Clinton were targeted at the formation of a Palestinian state on pre-1967 borders. Guess who saboed it?

More illegal Jewish houses on stolen territory were built after the signing of Oslo than were built before that signing.
Part of the Oslo agreement was that NO JEWISH HOUSES /SETTLEMENTS TO BE BUILT.

GIVE THE PALESTINIANS ARMAMENTS EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN ISRAELI SO THAT THEY CAN FIGHT THEIR OWN FIGHTS FOR THEIR LAND

 

[yellowarse]

More illegal Jewish houses on stolen territory were built after the signing of Oslo than were built before that signing.
Part of the Oslo agreement was that NO JEWISH HOUSES /SETTLEMENTS TO BE BUILT.

GIVE THE PALESTINIANS ARMAMENTS EQUIVALENT OR BETTER THAN ISRAELI SO THAT THEY CAN FIGHT THEIR OWN FIGHTS FOR THEIR LAND

There are many Jewish cock-suckers here who will swallow everything willy-nilly they read in the Jewish-owned media. The current Gazan escalation, for example, had nothing at all to do with the murder of 3 Israeli teenagers. Hamas was not responsible, and the IDF knew it. It was just an excuse to decimate Gaza. I wouldn't be surprised that the abduction/murder of the Israeli teens was an Israeli black op.

[TABLE="class: indypagebody, width: 0"]
<tbody>[TR]
[TD="bgcolor: #FFFFFF"]New Reports Show That Murder of 3 Israeli Teenage Settlers Was Not Carried Out by Hamas

Saturday July 26, 2014 22:46

by Celine Hagbard - IMEMC News

The alleged kidnapping and murder of three Israeli settlers, in late June, was the oft-cited reason for Israel’s escalation against the Hamas government in the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip. But new evidence indicates that Hamas was not responsible at all for the murders, according to reporters who spoke with Israeli police.​

Mass abduction of Hamas officials in June (image by karachireports.wordpress.com)
​

The order of events, taking into consideration that Israeli raids of the West Bank and shooting of Gazan fishermen have been daily occurrences for years, began with the disappearance of three Israeli teenagers, from a colony built on Palestinian land in the West Bank, on June 12th.

For three weeks following, Israeli forces rampaged through the West Bank, abducting legislators, politicians, and virtually anyone who was publicly associated with the political party Hamas (a Palestinian political party whose armed wing has, in the past, claimed responsibility for attacks against both Israeli soldiers and Israeli civilians), taking over 900 people into custody. Hamas officials vehemently denied any connection with the disappearance of the settlers. Palestinian officials challenged the campaign of mass abductions as a violation of international law.

It should be noted that the raids against Hamas officials came within a month after the Palestinian Authority announced the formation of a unity government that included both the more militant Hamas party and the Fateh party, which has long acted as an arm of the Israeli occupation government in the West Bank. Israeli officials had voiced alarm at this development, as it represented a unification between Palestinian factions that had long been divided. The U.S. government had even announced that it would consider working with the unity government (see here andhere), raising alarm among Israeli officials who had tried to discredit the Palestinian efforts.

After the teens’ bodies were found on June 30th, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu stated unequivocally, "They were kidnapped and murdered in cold blood by animals in human form. Hamas is responsible, and Hamas will pay” for their disappearance. He did not, however, present any evidence to support this claim. Six weeks later, after the abduction and torturous interrogation of hundreds of Palestinians in the West Bank, there has still been no evidence presented that shows Hamas involvement – or even the involvement of any Palestinians at all – in the deaths of the three youth.

Indeed, on Friday, July 25th, BBC reporter Jon Donnison published on Twitter a series of statements from a conversation he had with the Israeli police spokesperson, Micky Rosenfeld.

Donnison wrote, “Israeli police MickeyRosenfeld tells me men who killed 3 Israeli teens def[initely] lone cell, Hamas affiliated but not operating under leadership … Seems to contradict the line from Netanyahu government.”

He also wrote that Rosenfeld told him, “Israeli police spokes Mickey Rosenfeld also said if kidnapping had been ordered by Hamas leadership, they'd have known about it in advance.”

In addition to implying that Israel has moles within the leadership of the Hamas party, this statement also draws into question the stated justification for Israel’s offensive into Gaza, which has already claimed up to 1,000 lives.

This is not the first time that Israeli officials have admitted that they do not believe Hamas was behind the disappearance and subsequent deaths of the teens. On June 15th, Sheera Frenkel of Buzzfeed reported, “The kidnapping of three Israeli teenagers was likely carried out by a small group of militants with no direct orders from Hamas, ISIS, or any other regional terror group, said senior Israeli and Palestinian officials Sunday. ‘What we do know, is that this was likely an opportunistic move. The men behind this may have ties to a larger terror group, but this does not have the markings of a well-planned, complex operation,’ One Israeli officer, based in the West Bank, told BuzzFeed. ‘It makes it more difficult to find them if there isn’t a larger trail of intelligence to sniff out.’”

Most analysts familiar with the issue say that the ongoing Israeli offensive in Gaza has nothing to do with the three teens (or the subsequent increase in Palestinian resistance shelling that followed the Israeli raids and abductions of 800 Hamas-affiliated people in the West Bank), but was meant to challenge the Palestinian Authority’s unity government, and had been planned for months

[/TD]
[/TR]
</tbody>[/TABLE]

 

[Devil Within]

Golden opportunities? It was implicit that the Oslo Accords by the parties (Rabin, Arafat, Clinton) would lead to a Palestinian State with pre-1967 borders. But the Israelis were never sincere about implementing Oslo and they effectively scuppered the deal when they allowed settlements to grow unabated as well as expand the militarization of the occupied terrorities.

It takes 2 hands to clap. The Arab Muslims weren't saint either.

http://usforeignpolicy.about.com/od/middleeast/a/What-Were-The-Oslo-Accords.htm
Derailment

The PLO moved to validate its renunciation of violence with a change of organization and name. In 1994 the PLO became the Palestinian National Authority, or simply the PA -- Palestinian Authority. Israel also began giving up territory in Gaza and the West Bank.

But in 1995, an Israeli radical, angry over the Oslo Accords, assassinated Rabin. Palestinian "rejectionists" --many of them refugees in neighboring Arab countries who thought Arafat had betrayed them -- began attacks on Israel. Hezbollah, operating out of southern Lebanon, began a series of attacks against Israel. Those culminated in the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah War.

Those incidents scared Israelis, who then elected the conservative Benjamin Netanyahu to his first term as prime minister. Netanyahu did not like the Oslo Accords, and he put no effort into following up on their terms.

Netanyahu is again Israel's prime minister. He remains distrustful of a recognized Palestinian state.

 

[3_M]

Golden opportunities? It was implicit that the Oslo Accords by the parties (Rabin, Arafat, Clinton) would lead to a Palestinian State with pre-1967 borders. But the Israelis were never sincere about implementing Oslo and they effectively scuppered the deal when they allowed settlements to grow unabated as well as expand the militarization of the occupied terrorities.

Typical Israeli modus operandi: promise one thing to ease international pressure, quietly pursue the opposite objectives.

In Netanyahu's own words:

In a 2001 video, Netanyahu, reportedly unaware he was being recorded, said: "They asked me before the election if I'd honor [the Oslo accords]... I said I would, but [that] I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue."[SUP][9][/SUP][SUP][10][/SUP] Netanyahu then explained how he conditioned his signing of the 1997 Hebron agreement on American consent that there be no withdrawals from "specified military locations", and insisted he be allowed to specify which areas constituted a "military location"—such as the whole of the Jordan Valley. "Why is that important? Because from that moment on I stopped the Oslo Accords", Netanyahu affirmed.[SUP][11][/SUP]

There is no such requirement. Resolution 242 doesn't require Israel to withdraw to it pre 1967 border.

 

[THE_CHANSTER]

Why are Hamas building tunnels into Israel?

 

[Devil Within]

There are many Jewish cock-suckers here who will swallow everything willy-nilly they read in the Jewish-owned media. The current Gazan escalation, for example, had nothing at all to do with the murder of 3 Israeli teenagers. Hamas was not responsible, and the IDF knew it. It was just an excuse to decimate Gaza. I wouldn't be surprised that the abduction/murder of the Israeli teens was an Israeli black op.

Retarded Muslims believes in fairy tales and lies of Koran and lies told by Muslim terrorists.

In Israel, Muslim Arabs serve in IDF, but you can't say the same for Muslim Palestinian terrorists. The Muslim terrorists only uses naive idiots and children to do their fighting for them.

Muslims in the Israeli Army
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/SrubbQqHdwk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Muslim IDF Soldier Keeps Watch Over Israel's Gaza Border
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/w0dOvJp1ZFM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[3_M]

Don't be so gullibly taken in by the Jewish-dominated media lah. When IDF shells and bombs UN shelters and schools and homes, and their soldiers open fire deliberately on kids and women, it does strain credulity a fair bit to keep on insisting on the human shield myth.

Take a walk along the streets of Gaza and see how congested it is. There's practically no space to set aside for a 'military zone'. 2 million people living cheek-by-jowl in squalor on a piece of land half the size of Singapore with no high-rise buildings. You want to launch a rocket, you do it from any available open space or back alley, which invariably will be less than 50 yards from a house or mosque or school or refugee camp.

---

Israel-Gaza conflict: The myth of Hamas’s human shields

What used to be a three-storey house had been turned into debris sunk into a deep crater with twisted steel rods jutting out. Twenty-six people were killed in the mostly deadly air-strike so far in this bloody conflict. Twenty-four of them were from one family, the Abu Jamaa.

Around the same time that attack was taking place on Sunday evening, Benjamin Netanyahu was charging Hamas on TV with using “human shields” to gather “telegenically dead Palestinians for their cause”. It has long been the Israeli case that the militants cynically and deliberately carry out attacks and store weapons in residential areas and have also stopped people living there from evacuating homes when fighting breaks out.


There have been instances in the 13 days of the current war when the Israelis have sought to provide evidence proving their case. After warplanes targeted the al-Farouq mosque, near the Nuseirat refugee camp, for instance, the military issued aerial photographs which, it stated, showed that the building was being used to store rockets. We have also had the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, announcing that it had discovered 20 rockets hidden in one of its disuse schools in a “flagrant violation” of international law. And rockets are seen to be regularly fired from stretches of open ground close to homes.

Are militants also deliberately placing themselves in residences which are then attacked? On the day that Al-Farouq was attacked, the Israeli military also carried out a missile strike on a home for the handicapped in Beit Lahiya, killing two disabled residents and injuring four others. A neighbour claimed that a member of the Islamic Jihad group and his wife had also lived in the building; but he could provide no names or dates for this.

Jamilla Alaiwa, a 59 year old social worker who founded the home 24 years ago told me that this was categorically untrue. “If the Israelis have proof of this let them make it public. There was no one from Islamic Jihad or Hamas living there. We are not involved in politics.” The Israeli military stated they were investigating what happened; their conclusions have not reached Gaza. Were they, perhaps, fed false information?


Some Gazans have admitted that they were afraid of criticizing Hamas, but none have said they had been forced by the organisation to stay in places of danger and become unwilling human-shields. The Bani Sobeila area, near Khan Younis, where the Abu Jamaa deaths took place received leaflets dropped from the air last week warning them to leave.


But almost all stayed. One reason for that was many of the houses belonged to the Abu Jamaa clan who felt there was safety in staying together. Another reason was given by a neighbour, Abdullah al-Daweish: “Where do we go to? Some people moved from the outer edge of Khan Younis to Khan Younis centre after Israelis told them to, then the centre got bombed. People have moved from this area to Gaza City, and Gaza City has been bombed. It’s not Hamas who is ordering us in this, it’s the Israelis.”

Why did they think the house targeted? “We don’t know,” said Saied Abu Jamaa, a cousin who was in his home next door when the blast took place. “Tawfiq, who is the head of the family, is a policeman, but why should he and his family and his neighbours die for that?” Tawfiq Abu Jamaa, 40, distraught figure in a brown jellabiya at the funeral was also at a loss to understand why he had lost his wife and eight children. The sole survivor has Nour, a son of four.


There were 10 recently destroyed buildings on the half-hour drive from Khan Younis to Shujaiya, a town where 90 people had been killed in a 24 hours, an onslaught condemned by the Palestinian government of Mahmoud Abbas as a “heinous massacre”: and UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon as “ an atrocious action”.


Members of families who owned six of the buildings had moved in with relations and neighbours in the area. Their reason for staying behind was primarily because there was, they said, nowhere else to go. There were also declarations about not giving up one’s land, not giving in to invaders.


There was denial of coercion by Hamas. “I am not going to go because I can do something Hamas cannot do”, maintained Nabil al-Masri. “I know from times before that if Israeli soldiers get into an empty house they will ruin it on purpose. Hamas cannot stop them going into my house if we leave, but, by staying here we can try to make sure that doesn’t happen.”
Hamas can, however, be accused of making people complacent, repeatedly stating in the media that the Israeli warnings were psychological games and asking the population to ignore them. Some mentioned this as a reason for staying behind; returning home having initially left.


The counter-argument to that was the need to prevent panic spreading. Almost 85,000 people have been on the move, overwhelming the shelters set up by the UN by sheer numbers. Classrooms meant for 30 now hold up to 70, one typical example was the Girls Preparatory Secondary School, at a suburb of Beit Lahiya in the north, with a capacity of 800 which has taken in 1600. Homes of relatives, a traditional source of refuge, are also feeling the strain.

Yasir Hamidi had six additional mouths to feed, along with his family of four, once the bombing began; five more relatives had joined since the ground invasion. His salary from the Ministry of Health stopped even before the conflict started because Gaza’s Hamas administration is bankrupt. “The family members brought some money, but they had to leave almost everything else behind: we are living on my savings, but it will not last for long. After that, who knows?” Mr Hamidi spread his hands in resignation.


Gazans point out that the outside world remains largely unaware just how small and confined the place is – just 25 miles long and just a few miles wide. It is blocked in by closed borders to Israel in the north and east and Egypt in the south. There is no route out by the sea to the west with an Israeli naval blockade. Getting to travel abroad is an excruciatingly long process.


This may be due to Hamas and Islamic Jihad exporting violence, as Israel and Egypt claim, but it is the increasingly large percentage of the 1.7 million population being pushed by the violence into the already heavily congested centre, who are suffering as the relentless bombings and shootings continue.
At the funeral of the Abu Jamaa family, as another body in a shroud was lowered into the grave, Saied, the cousin said: “ That is the only escape many of us will have from here.”

Did anyone force these children and civilians to be human shield? Likely not but they are still human shield from an operational point.

Using human shield is a matter of choice for Hamas. When Israel asked civilians to leave the area, HAMAS asked them to stay and become human shield. It got nothing to do with how congested the streets of GAza are. As a matter of fact, tunnels, arm cache, firing position were all found in civilian installations. That makes it legitimate military targets. Were the Palestinian being force to become human shield? If no then they only got themselves to blame.

 

[yellowarse]

Using human shield is a matter of choice for Hamas. When Israel asked civilians to leave the area, HAMAS asked them to stay and become human shield. It got nothing to do with how congested the streets of GAza are.

Where are the civilians going to go to, pray tell? UN refugee centre? When you're phosphor bombing every single civilian building/shelter in site, even your own home is unsafe.

 

[Devil Within]

When you're phosphor bombing every single civilian building/shelter in site, even your own home is unsafe.

See how liars tried to lie? Every single civilian building? Please!.... Only those that Hamas fired rockets from. If Israel really bomb every single civilian buildings, than there will be really peace now. No more hiding place for Hamas and no Muslims civilian living in Gaza. Too bad Israel didn't bomb every single civilian buildings like you've tried to lie.

 

[3_M]

Where are the civilians going to go to, pray tell? UN refugee centre? When you're phosphor bombing every single civilian building/shelter in site, even your own home is unsafe.

That not the problem of Israel isn't it? U should hold Hamas responsible for their fate. Ask Hamas not to turn every civilian buildings into military targets for Israel

 

[Devil Within]

That not the problem of Israel isn't it? U should hold Hamas responsible for their fate. Ask Hamas not to turn every civilian buildings into military targets for Israel

Muslim terrorist and their cock suckers always like to put the blame on others but failed to reflect upon themselves. They were the trouble maker/starter but yet, they want to play victims.

 

[steffychun]

Witthout the IDF, the SAf would not be trained.

 

[Hitler_Bush]

Pray that 1000X stronger new Hitler return to clean up Jews in particular Israelis ASAP.

 

[HongKanSeng]

Hi all!

My theory is ultra simple and effective.

Nazis RAPED JEWS in WW2 doubtlessly.

So as a result of rape, todays ISRAELIS n JEWISH WARRIORS
CARRIES NAZI GENES.

Easy to understand?

Thus we have today's Gaza Atrocities. It is the Jewish Nazi at war simply it is NAZI PART 2.

Probrably even Hitler's joniors at their father's best capabilities.

Therefore the unfinished task of WW2 Allies to finish off Nazis have to further continue on Israel. Bomb Israel like WW2 Berlin. Nuke Israel like Hiroshima Nagasaki. DISARM IDF 100%.


Put entire region out of Jewish forces military as well as civilian.

 

[winnipegjets]

They may be cute little girls now but they will go on to procreate multiple times and breed an army of next generation terrorists to perpetuate the killing and the bloodshed.

Extermination is the best option.

That explains why Hilter's action. You have the mind of Hilter.

 

[winnipegjets]

Witthout the IDF, the SAf would not be trained.

SAF has the genes of Jews then.

To show SAF's gratitude to IDF, two SAF divisions should be sent over to help Israel fight Hamas. Kee Chiu and the Ng brothers can lead the expedition force. You can go along too as special adviser.

 

[winnipegjets]

Did anyone force these children and civilians to be human shield? Likely not but they are still human shield from an operational point.

Using human shield is a matter of choice for Hamas. When Israel asked civilians to leave the area, HAMAS asked them to stay and become human shield. It got nothing to do with how congested the streets of GAza are. As a matter of fact, tunnels, arm cache, firing position were all found in civilian installations. That makes it legitimate military targets. Were the Palestinian being force to become human shield? If no then they only got themselves to blame.

Based on your reasoning, the whole of Israel is a human shield. Thus Hamas launching rockets is totally justifiable.