• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is the Fed Broke?

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is the Fed Broke?

Robert Wenzel
Economic Policy Journal
January 17, 2011

Bob McTeer, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, argues that the Federal Reserve has no reason to mark to market its securities holdings:

First, there is no need for the Fed to mark to market since its assets are not held for trading and can easily be held to maturity or recovery if necessary

Curiously, he does not discuss what happens to his theory if it turns out some Fed assets are total junk and worthless. This could very well be the case. The Fed has still not told us all the collateral it loaned money out against during the financial crisis.

I hasten to add that this somewhat of an academic question, though, since the most important reason you need to know the value of assets on a balance sheet is to determine if they are greater than liabilities, to evaluate whether an organization will have the means to meet its obligations. This is not a problem with the Fed, since even if all its assets were worthless, it could still simply print new money to payoff its obligations.
 

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
Is the Fed Broke?

Robert Wenzel
Economic Policy Journal
January 17, 2011

Bob McTeer, former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, argues that the Federal Reserve has no reason to mark to market its securities holdings:

First, there is no need for the Fed to mark to market since its assets are not held for trading and can easily be held to maturity or recovery if necessary

Curiously, he does not discuss what happens to his theory if it turns out some Fed assets are total junk and worthless. This could very well be the case. The Fed has still not told us all the collateral it loaned money out against during the financial crisis.

I hasten to add that this somewhat of an academic question, though, since the most important reason you need to know the value of assets on a balance sheet is to determine if they are greater than liabilities, to evaluate whether an organization will have the means to meet its obligations. This is not a problem with the Fed, since even if all its assets were worthless, it could still simply print new money to payoff its obligations.

What a stupid writer. The Fed owes something that it can just print.
 

Dreamer1

Alfrescian
Loyal
What the Fed can do is to impose a tax on USD,since it is the reserve currency,and there is absolutely no competition to its status,not Yen,not Euro,not RMB

So the world trade must go on,folks all need USD,the world needs USD to function.

And the maker of USD-Fed and only Fed!

Fed has a long list of poweful weaponry which it can unleash on the world,so it is stupid to think that Fed is a lame duck
 
Top