• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is Singapore's standard of English going down the drain?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
Posted on 09 Apr 2012
Is Singapore's standard of English going down the drain?

is_singapores_standard_of_english_going_down_the_drain-thumbnail.jpg

An expression used in a newspaper advertisement, which reads 'By Invite Only', caught the attention of STOMPer .Lim, who is worried that the current English standards in Singapore may not be as good as it used to be.

The STOMPer wrote:

"About a week ago, Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) advertised on the front page of a newspaper with the words 'By Invite Only' -- shouldn't it read as 'By Invitation Only' instead?

"I seem to be coming across too many variants of words that I have not used since I was a student.

"Here are some examples: how much is your spend (instead of "expenditure"); advertorial/advertisement; connectivity/connection; estimation/estimate; expiration/expiry; experimentation/experiment; incentivize/give incentives; origination/origin.

"The list of terms goes on.

"In addition, I frequently hear over the radio that the DJ wants to "speak with" someone, rather than "speak to" someone.

"Is the English language going down the drain? I may belong to the old school (I'm in my forties) but I don't buy the idea that those who use the language incorrectly can summon the notion of English being a 'living language' as an excuse for the errors, if they indeed are errors in the first place."
 
Singapore's english has for a long while been in the gutter. Clowns like fucking Vickram can trounce some ah beng in parliament precisely because of that.
 
Our standard of English have gone from better to betterer to betterest.
 
Posted on 09 Apr 2012
Is Singapore's standard of English going down the drain?

is_singapores_standard_of_english_going_down_the_drain-thumbnail.jpg

An expression used in a newspaper advertisement, which reads 'By Invite Only',

Although by invite only is grammatically wrong, it is becoming increasingly acceptable in conversational English. It is a smiliar case with conjunctions. In formal English, we are not allowed to start a sentence with but. However, this rule is relaxed when it comes to informal/conversational English.

The writer might have been a bit pedantic but he has a point. The standard of English in Sinkieland is going down the drain. Many people who write and speak in conversational English actually think they are using formal English. Talking to them about grammar is like trying to teach a cow to play the piano.
 
As long as the message is understood, who cares? The world will not end with fxxk type English.
 
bad_english.jpg




This has to be the result of the free influx of foreign trash, especially those from PRC.

Well done the gahman of S'pore!
 
Back
Top