Is Singapore 'City in a Garden' claim Fraudulent and False with no basis in reality? Why are Singaporeans such backwards people with a obsolete Neanderthal mentality?
A video about an unfortunate cyclist accident along Bartley flyover on a Sunday morning (whilst legally cycling on public roads) in Singapore has brought about the worst in netizens with their ugly and inhumane troll comments.
[YOUTUBE]Qqz3XgS0i6A[/YOUTUBE]
Their ugly and myopic comments betray the fact that maybe Singapore's City in a Garden claims are purely artificial and just fake propaganda to get more tourists to visit Singapore or for unfounded claims which are so obviously revealed as fake in the public comments by Singaporeans on popular local internet forums.
In short, Singaporeans are low class, gas guzzling petrol heads with no care or concerns for mother Earth, and all their claims to building a city in a garden are unfounded and fake claims calculated to deceive the international press media.
Singaporeans have no love for green modes of transportation and can only see as far as their own road space where their metal boxes spewing CO2 and other pollutants whiz by at dangerous breakneck speed.
What kind of 'City in a Garden' has no space for cyclist but a bogus show piece artificially invented only to deceive people. Are Singapore's international accolades for urban greenery a forgery or equal ficticious too?
https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/biophilic-design-key-making-singapore-city-garden
==================
Public forum evidence to show that many Singaporeans are against the City in a Garden concept and are quite myopic and black hearted as well:
From: https://forums.fuckwarezone.com.sg/...duct-injured-multiple-cyclists-6023542-9.html
A video about an unfortunate cyclist accident along Bartley flyover on a Sunday morning (whilst legally cycling on public roads) in Singapore has brought about the worst in netizens with their ugly and inhumane troll comments.
[YOUTUBE]Qqz3XgS0i6A[/YOUTUBE]
Their ugly and myopic comments betray the fact that maybe Singapore's City in a Garden claims are purely artificial and just fake propaganda to get more tourists to visit Singapore or for unfounded claims which are so obviously revealed as fake in the public comments by Singaporeans on popular local internet forums.
In short, Singaporeans are low class, gas guzzling petrol heads with no care or concerns for mother Earth, and all their claims to building a city in a garden are unfounded and fake claims calculated to deceive the international press media.
Singaporeans have no love for green modes of transportation and can only see as far as their own road space where their metal boxes spewing CO2 and other pollutants whiz by at dangerous breakneck speed.
What kind of 'City in a Garden' has no space for cyclist but a bogus show piece artificially invented only to deceive people. Are Singapore's international accolades for urban greenery a forgery or equal ficticious too?
==================
Public forum evidence to show that many Singaporeans are against the City in a Garden concept and are quite myopic and black hearted as well:
From: https://forums.fuckwarezone.com.sg/...duct-injured-multiple-cyclists-6023542-9.html
