• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is Israel Really Trying to Evict Innocent Palestinians From Their Homes In Sheikh Jarrah?

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2021/05/palestinians-who-demand-675000-jews-be.html



Palestinians who demand 675,000 Jews be evicted because they are Jewish are complaining about "ethnic cleansing" in Sheikh Jarrah

The headlines from Sheikh Jarrah almost all ignore the basic facts of the issue: The buildings in question are owned by Jews and the Arab residents have refused to pay rent - even though they had agreed in a 1982 court case.

As NGO Monitor summarizes:


According to the Supreme Court, the land in question “was owned by Chief Rabbi (Hacham Bashi) Avraham Ashkenazi and Chief Rabbi Meir Orbach until the War of Independence [1948], after they purchased it in 1875 from its Arab owners.”
Subsequently, two Jewish organizations, Va’ad Eidat HaSfaradim and Va’ad HaKlali L’Knesset Yisrael, worked to register the land with British Mandatory government in 1946.
The properties were registered with Israeli authorities under these two organizations in 1973.
These organizations sold the properties to the Nahalat Shimon organization in 2003.

According to a 1979 High Court decision, and re-affirmed repeatedly in subsequent cases, as in the case of any tenant living on someone else’s property, residents living on the land owned by these organizations were required to pay rent to the organizations that owned the properties. Their failure to do so, along with instances of illegal building and illegally renting properties to others, resulted in the current legal proceedings against them, culminating in the District Court decision.

Crucially, in 1982, a number of residents- including those whose descendants appealed to the District Court- agreed in Magistrate Court that the 2 Israeli non-profits were the legal land owners.
The Arab claims that they are the legal owners have been proven to be false in court many times over the years.

Israel-haters, however, are calling evicting a few dozen illegal squatters "ethnic cleansing."

Today, the Palestinian National Council sent letters to the heads of parliaments around the world and the Inter-Parliamentary Union, demanding support to stop the "ethnic cleansing of Jerusalemites" in Sheikh Jarrah.

Ethnic cleansing? The properties in dispute are only a small percentage of the area of Sheikh Jarrah. This UN map shows the areas that are claimed by Jews:


The same people who are screaming about "ethnic cleansing" of a small number of people are very clear as to their own goals: the eviction not of dozens but of 675,000 Jews from Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem.

A large part of the world insists that the kicking out Jews - and only Jews, not Israeli Arabs - from their historic homeland, where many of them have lived all their lives, is "justice" - while evicting a few illegal squatters who refuse to pay rent is what they call "ethnic cleansing."
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
DYqALHtF.jpeg
 

rushifa666

Alfrescian
Loyal
Stupid people. Its very primitive rockets vsamerican tech.if they were on even ground rockets woukd have hit everywhere.thats why onky reports shells never injuries
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
ABC News


https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...ar-loss-family-homes-evictions-loom-77595319#
LOG IN


Palestinians fear loss of family homes as evictions loom
Dozens of Palestinian families in east Jerusalem are at risk of losing their homes to Jewish settler groups following a decades-long legal battle
By JOSEPH KRAUSS Associated Press
10 May 2021, 18:24
• 6 min read

WireAP_4aaa105fe93441ae850b5f3ec7e7cd06_16x9_384.jpg


3:15
On Location: May 12, 2021
Catch up on the developing stories making headlines.
The Associated Press
JERUSALEM -- When Samira Dajani’s family moved into their first real home in 1956 after years as refugees, her father planted trees in the garden, naming them for each of his six children.
Today, two towering pines named for Mousa and Daoud stand watch over the entrance to the garden where they all played as children. Pink bougainvillea climbs an iron archway on a path leading past almond, orange and lemon trees to their modest stone house.

“The Samira tree has no leaves,” she says, pointing to the cypress that bears her name. “But the roots are strong.”
She and her husband, empty nesters with grown children of their own, may have to leave it all behind on Aug. 1. That’s when Israel is set to forcibly evict them following a decades-long legal battle waged by ideological Jewish settlers against them and their neighbors.
The Dajanis are one of several Palestinian families facing imminent eviction in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of east Jerusalem. The families’ plight has ignited weeks of demonstrations and clashes in recent days between protesters and Israeli police.
It also highlights an array of discriminatory policies that rights groups say are aimed at pushing Palestinians out of Jerusalem to preserve its Jewish majority. The Israeli rights group B’Tselem and the New York-based Human Rights Watch both pointed to such policies as an example of what they say has become an apartheid regime.

Israel rejects those accusations and says the situation in Sheikh Jarrah is a private real-estate dispute that the Palestinians have seized upon to incite violence. The Foreign Ministry did not respond to questions submitted by The Associated Press. A top municipal official and a settler group marketing “residential plots” in Sheikh Jarrah did not respond to requests for comment.
Settler groups say the land was owned by Jews prior to the 1948 war surrounding Israel’s creation. Israeli law allows Jews to reclaim such lands but bars Palestinians from recovering property they lost in the same war, even if they still reside in areas controlled by Israel.
Samira Dajani’s parents fled in 1948 from their home in Baka — now an upscale neighborhood in mostly Jewish west Jerusalem. After several years spent as refugees in Jordan, Syria and east Jerusalem, which was then controlled by Jordan, Jordanian authorities offered them one of several newly built homes in Sheikh Jarrah in exchange for giving up their refugee status.
“I have beautiful memories from this house,” says Dajani, now 70, recalling how she played with the other children in the close-knit neighborhood, where several other Palestinian refugee families had also been resettled. “It was like heaven after our exodus.”

Things changed after Israel captured east Jerusalem, along with the West Bank and Gaza, in the 1967 Mideast war, and annexed it in a move not recognized internationally. The Palestinians want all three territories for their future state and view east Jerusalem as their capital.
In 1972, settler groups told the families that they were trespassing on Jewish-owned land. That was the start of a long legal battle that in recent months has culminated with eviction orders against 36 families in Sheikh Jarrah and two other east Jerusalem neighborhoods. Israeli rights groups say other families are also vulnerable, estimating that more than 1,000 Palestinians are at risk of being evicted.
The Dajanis and other families have been ordered to leave by Aug. 1. A Supreme Court hearing in the case of another four families that was to be held on Monday was postponed for at least a month. If they lose the appeal, they could be forcibly evicted within days or weeks.
A woman from another family in Sheikh Jarrah said it was “an inhumane act” to take away someone’s home. She invited her parents to move in with her and her husband if they are evicted from the home where she was born and raised, but her father refused.
“He said there is no way I’m leaving this neighborhood unless I’m dead,” she said, requesting anonymity for fear of retribution by Israeli authorities. “It’s been 65 years that he’s lived in this neighborhood.”
Israel views all of Jerusalem as its unified capital and says residents are treated equally. But east Jerusalem residents have different rights depending on whether they are Jewish or Palestinian.
Jews born in east Jerusalem are automatically granted Israeli citizenship, and Jews from anywhere else in the world are eligible to become Israeli citizens.
Palestinians born in east Jerusalem are granted a form of permanent residency that can be revoked if they spend too much time living outside the city. They can apply for Israeli citizenship but must go through a difficult and uncertain bureaucratic process that can take months or years. Most refuse, because they do not recognize Israel’s annexation.
Palestinians are also treated differently when it comes to housing, which will make it difficult for the Sheikh Jarrah families to remain in Jerusalem if they are evicted.
After 1967, Israel expanded the city’s municipal boundaries to take in large areas of open land where it has since built Jewish settlements that are home to tens of thousands of people. At the same time, it set the boundaries of Palestinian neighborhoods, restricting their growth.

Today, more than 220,000 Jews live in east Jerusalem, mostly in built-up areas that Israel considers to be neighborhoods of its capital. Most of east Jerusalem’s 350,000 Palestinian residents are crammed into overcrowded neighborhoods where there is little room to build.
Palestinians say the expense and difficulty of obtaining permits forces them to build illegally or move to the occupied West Bank, where they risk losing their Jerusalem residency. Israeli rights groups estimate that of the 40,000 homes in Palestinian neighborhoods, half have been built without permits and are at risk of demolition.
In part due to the protests, Israel has come under international pressure over Sheikh Jarrah, with both the United States and the European Union expressing concern. Rights groups say the government can halt or postpone the evictions if it wants to.
In the meantime, Samira Dajani has planted her spring flowers in small pots that she’ll be able to take with her if she is forced from her home in August. The trees named for her and her siblings will have to stay. She says she tries not to think about it.
 

Eisenhut

Alfrescian
Loyal
When ppl say ethnic cleansing, it refers to rape of women and making them pregnant? The Jewish men would not come near any of these women, cmon
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
When ppl say ethnic cleansing, it refers to rape of women and making them pregnant? The Jewish men would not come near any of these women, cmon
How to rape?they arab ladies wear layers of clothing. By the time everything is off, you are exhausted.
 

Eisenhut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Land belongs to Israel, building belongs to Israel, ask you move out nicely and resettle you, don't want, want iron teeth and get iron dome
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Whatever the israeli jews imposed on the arabs, pAP did the same to the malays but without much resistance.

yeah except malaysia hosts more chinks than stinkypura has people
and all these decades neither indon or melayu built up any military or ballistic missile force or anything to hit stinkypura hard and sink it
they never refused to recognize stinkypura either despite its decidedly anti Islamic domestic and external policies
same indon+melayu still refuse to recognize zionist entity but only in public (behind the scene there is some minor trade)

arabs fought against zionists from the very beginnig and fought multiple wars
quite different in that sense

you are right, in some sense they are similar
well melayu are historically and currently globally insignificant
no history
no heritage
no civilization
no legends
no empires of note
no scientists no tech no legends no philosopher no mathematician no astronomer no navigation etc etc of note

hard to compare with arabs or others from middle eastern central asian corridor whose history over the last 1500 years is decidedly of global signifance
decidedly great
in fact, all the oldest civilizations in the world originated in the wider Middle Eastern region incl north africa and anatolia

only one younger civilization outside it is in tiongkok

rest are neighbours or minor civilization not worth mentioning


melayu or asean not comparable
they were influenced by ceca
to be influenced by ceca culture religion or heritage = to be decidedly dumb and primitive
true to a great extent for chopstick nations drinking bat soup and pig trotters soup too
they were influenced by lowly 78 IQ turd world ceca culture
can't expected those dumbf@rks to surpass ang moh kias

ang moh kias themselves were influenced by middle eastern culture religion history race alphabet civilization etc
 
Top