It's the same for moslems for think islamist parties are the best people to run a country.
Could you not also say the same for oppies thinking oppie parties thinking they are best people to run a country?
It's the same for moslems for think islamist parties are the best people to run a country.
Wrong comparison lah. Running a country based on religious beliefs is a horrible way to govern. Contrast it with our political parties (pap and opposition) which are secular. Having said that, yes I think the opposition can do a better job of running the country!Could you not also say the same for oppies thinking oppie parties thinking they are best people to run a country?
no lah!! not comparison lah!! Long time never hear from JT (what about a week?) Just poke him for fun lah....Wrong comparison lah. Running a country based on religious beliefs is a horrible way to govern. Contrast it with our political parties (pap and opposition) which are secular.
Oh dearie me, sorry to spoil your fun.no lah!! not comparison lah!! Long time never hear from JT (what about a week?) Just poke him for fun lah....
aiyah now you spoil my fun lah.....
on a serious note, a country run by any sort of religious bent and not by logic and the welfare of all of it's citizens and residents is one country I am definitely leaving and never returning to again....
on a serious note, a country run by any sort of religious bent and not by logic and the welfare of all of it's citizens and residents is one country I am definitely leaving and never returning to again....
that's why I said lots of different types. some extreme this way some extreme that way. best to use one's own mind. after all the people I've spoken to, the only conclusion I can draw is that a Muslim's idea of being Muslim is largely local to their local network. Go another town will get a different answer. So that's why I say cannot group all together.
IMO, googling is useless for me, usually get one biased opinion of some loudmouth or another. Best I ask a regular person who lives a regular life. This cut and paste stuff can end up with some crazy shit.
Till date, no jihad against Isis and radical islsm. Because it's fellow mudslimes. So just treated as a denouncement. But if Christians attack mudslimes, it's infidels n jihad against yankeeland etc. But mudslimes also happy to settle in ang mor lands despite jihad , infidels etc.
Wrong comparison lah. Running a country based on religious beliefs is a horrible way to govern. Contrast it with our political parties (pap and opposition) which are secular. Having said that, yes I think the opposition can do a better job of running the country!
Wrong comparison lah. Running a country based on religious beliefs is a horrible way to govern. Contrast it with our political parties (pap and opposition) which are secular. Having said that, yes I think the opposition can do a better job of running the country!
The Christian work ethic is a fine way to run a country. Most european countries today are secular, but operate under judeo-christian concepts with the Christian Protestant work ethic.
Running a country according to moslem values, has proven to be a disaster, just like communism. Hardly any moslem sharia country is at the top of the list for 'most happy countries', 'most rights for women', 'most rights for minorities'. Even in european countries, it is the moslem ghetto that is the most dangerous and poorest.
Even though the prophet was gay, I am sure he did not wish all his followers were gay too. Else how to procreate and multiply his believers.Islam is actually quite tolerant... especially when it comes to LGBT causes.
European countries like Belarus or Moldova you mean?
Which are these Muslim shariah ruled countries?
Every Muslim shariah ruled country that has a free government has been invaded (Afghanistan) or is a pariah (like Iran) and isolated, sanctioned, demonized and threatened with invasion.
Before colonial loot, where were these European countries in development.