The police witnesses admitted in Court that they did not carry out any forensic tests (serology) on the patients who allegedly received saline injections instead of proper vaccine. In other words, the patients believed that they had received saline injections and such belief was based solely on the verbal confirmation of Dr Jipson to the patients.
If that is the case, Dr Jipson can now claim that the patients had in fact received proper vaccines such as Sinopharm or Sinovac, and the police will NOT be able to prove otherwise since it's too late to do a serology test on the patients. The prosecution can prefer a new charge against Dr Jipson for some dishonesty charges [against the patients], but the charges in relation to HPB over fake COVID shots will have to be dropped because the prosecution has simply no evidence that will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the patients did not receive the proper vaccine. Yes, there may still be doubts over whether the proper vaccines were administered, but the benefit of the doubt is exclusively the prerogative of the accused.
If the prosecution cannot prove Dr Jipson, the principal accused, cheated HPB over fake COVID shots, then surely Iris Koh must also be deemed innocent.
