- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 109
- Points
- 0
Australia and New Zealand are far away from everywhere but close to each other why both country's indigenous people look so different? Are they not supposed to be related since they are so close to each other?
Australia and New Zealand are far away from everywhere but close to each other why both country's indigenous people look so different? Are they not supposed to be related since they are so close to each other?
View attachment 14575
View attachment 14576
Aussie abos look more beaten up. Is it because of the racist and convict Australian regime?
Australia and New Zealand are far away from everywhere but close to each other why both country's indigenous people look so different? Are they not supposed to be related since they are so close to each other?
Thank you all for your reply here.
I am asking a simple and innocent question here but judging from the replies I do sense some racism and hostility here towards them.
What brought me to ask this question is I'd just finished listening to a BBC documentary "Battling Booze in Alice Spring" here http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/docarchive/docarchive_20131017-0100a.mp3
The documentary focused on alcoholism among aboriginals living in and around Alice Spring. When asked why aboriginals use alcohol an aboriginal volunteer answered and I quote, "Most in grief. Indigenous people have to cope with losing family members, they get taken away from their land, they get taken away from their homes. It's like a roller coaster that has gone out of control and the only solution to their problems and feelings is alcohol."
I wonder how much truth is there in the above statement.
Anyway I don't hear any alcoholism problem among New Zealand's indigenous people the Maori, I could be wrong.
When the Europeans came and subsequently decided to colonize Australia, they went on a killing spree of the indigenous Australian to the extent that certain tribes of indigenous Australians were entirely wiped out. As for the remaining indigenous people that survived, the white men force their religion and way of life on them and apparently this does not work very well for the indigenous people, leading to extreme poverty and drug and alcohol abuse among the indigenous people till today. Before the arrival of Europeans, indigenous Australia were able to live substantively relying purely on what mother nature has to offer them and they even developed their own traditional aboriginal medicine. The arrival of the white men changed their fate for the worst....
Maoris are Polynesians.
Australian aboriginals are Australoids, sharing the same ancient ancestry with South Asian Dravidians, before the Australasian continent broke away from Eurasia.
They share one thing in common.. they're both morons.
Burmese and Persians are both useless cat breeds
After my last post above more of you had contributed to my understanding. Thank you.
With the above information I went to google and found out that the Maori are totally different from Australoids however one cannot put all the darks skin people under Australoid as what some of you had done because there is another distinct group known as Negritos which is people got confused with Australoids. Negritos are found mainly in South East Asia and Andaman sea area. Even within Australoid and Negrito there are sub groups. Guess somehow we're all related even we are different.
Let me try:
Kiwis are descendant of sea-faring Polynesians. The Ozzie Abos evolved from some marsupial primate. Different lineage.
Cheers!
wrong abos are actually descended from Keling shit skins
wrong abos are actually descended from Keling shit skins