• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

If you have these 3 wishes, which would you choose?

Lisa Manoban is pretty, has a sexy body and dances well, but is a below
average singer. Yet she has US$40 million to her name at the age of 28 years.
Lisa.jpg
 
Not a good choice. Be careful of what you wished for. Having eternal health and live would soon become a nightmare without enough wealth, power and authority and you would wished you die earlier LOL.

Wealth should always comes first, then followed by the rest, whatever the fark that is, follow the PAP-Gov method is the best - GDP GGDP GDP and suck maximum from citizens into the reserves to build more wealth first, rest then talk LOL.

To add on, it also explains why Emperor Qin first strive for wealth, power, and authority to build up his vast army first (which again requires immense wealth) as a first priority before thinking about creating an immortal pill to live forever LOL.
 
To add on, it also explains why Emperor Qin first strive for wealth, power, and authority to build up his vast army first (which again requires immense wealth) as a first priority before thinking about creating an immortal pill to live forever LOL.
18917956.jpg
 
Not a good choice. Be careful of what you wished for. Having eternal health and live would soon become a nightmare without enough wealth, power and authority and you would wished you die earlier LOL.

Wealth should always comes first, then followed by the rest, whatever the fark that is, follow the PAP-Gov method is the best - GDP GDP GDP and suck maximum from citizens into the reserves to build more wealth first, rest then talk LOL.

if can trade with Mr. SA Tan ... moi want to be Sinkie Dracula .... :whistling:
 
The author of Ecclesiastes in the Bible is just stating a fact of this world we live in, where money is used to purchase the essentials and pleasures of life like food, drink, entertainment, shelter etc. It is a statement about how the world works, and does not promote materialism.
 
The author of Ecclesiastes states that money answers everything in a practical sense, but he knows that it cannot answer life's ultimate questions or buy us wisdom, health or salvation.
 
The author of Ecclesiastes states that money answers everything in a practical sense, but he knows that it cannot answer life's ultimate questions or buy us wisdom, health or salvation.

So go for practical stuffs like earning more money first LOL.
 
So go for practical stuffs like earning more money first LOL.
Ecclesiastes says that everything "under the sun", including pleasure, hard work and money is ultimately "vanity" i.e. meaningless if it is not connected to obedience of God.
 
Ecclesiastes says that everything "under the sun", including pleasure, hard work and money is ultimately "vanity" i.e. meaningless if it is not connected to obedience of God.

Obedience of 'God' will be meaningless and senseless if you have no money, hence always go for earning more money first (legally of course) before everything else.

Go for science rather than what ranjiao 'Obedience to God'.

The Case Against “God” and the Illusion of Obedience

For centuries, humans have filled the gaps of their ignorance with gods. When thunder roared, it was Zeus. When disease struck, it was punishment from an unseen hand. Every mystery once had a divine explanation — until science arrived. Each discovery, from lightning to DNA, has pushed “God” further into retreat. As Neil deGrasse Tyson aptly said, “God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance.”

If a deity truly governed existence, the evidence should be overwhelming, not evasive. Instead, what we find is a universe that operates by consistent, discoverable laws — gravity, relativity, quantum mechanics — none of which require divine supervision. When a plane crashes and one survivor thanks God, science demands we ask: what about the hundreds who burned alive? Invoking “God’s will” is not an answer; it’s an excuse to stop thinking.

Obedience to scripture — unquestioning, blind adherence to ancient texts — is perhaps the most dangerous inheritance from our past. It replaces curiosity with compliance. The Bible, Quran, and other scriptures were written by men who did not know the Earth orbits the Sun, yet their followers claim these texts contain “absolute truth.” Tyson reminds us that “the moment you are satisfied with mystery, you stop seeking answers.” To obey such ignorance is not faith; it’s intellectual surrender.

Science, by contrast, thrives on doubt — not dogma. It does not demand belief; it demands evidence. The same method that eradicated smallpox, landed rovers on Mars, and reveals the birth of galaxies 13 billion years ago, asks no worship in return. It simply says: Look closer.

“God” explains nothing and halts progress; science explains everything it can and invites progress. Every candle of understanding we light banishes another corner of darkness once labeled “divine.” The history of human advancement is the story of replacing superstition with knowledge.

The truly moral act is not obedience to an invisible authority but responsibility to each other, to truth, and to the fragile planet that birthed us. As Tyson notes, “We are stardust — a way for the cosmos to know itself.” There is no greater reverence than that.

In short: The idea of God persists because it comforts. Science persists because it works. One demands faith; the other delivers truth. The choice between obedience and understanding is the choice between darkness and light — and the universe, not scripture, holds the real answers.
-----------------
 
Obedience of 'God' will be meaningless and senseless if you have no money, hence always go for earning more money first (legally of course) before everything else.
-----------------
Church members work in the marketplace to earn enough money to tithe 10% to God through their church. Charities also adopt a social enterprise model to generate revenue on top of donations to help the less fortunate; they wouldn't be able to help the needy if these charities don't earn enough money.
 
Back
Top