In Sinkieland, blind faith in Lightning is the worst kind of religion.
If only Dog is My God would scroll down that webpage and read this comment :oIo::
Sadly this article is poorly researched and is grasping at luciferian indoctrination concepts for answers, a short list of the things that must be corrected are:
1. Citing sitchin, who was a huckster, and didn’t know enough proper sumerian to translate what he claimed to, is not only intellectually dishonest, but could be construed as gross disinformation tactics, if the author is not merely misinformed. (see sitchiniswrong.com)
2. The buzzword and luciferian/neo-gnostic “astrotheology” system is similarly intellectually dishonest, it is unthinking syncretism with no regard to legitimate mythological study, furthermore the fact that this theory is supported and pushed in mainstream media channels as well as being sponsored and sold by the likes of D.M. Murdock, is indicative of who has cooked up the theory, not only is it as far removed from cosmological truth as one can feasibly get, the likes of murdock have been caught several times skewing texts or misquoting to directly support their endeavors. Finally “astrotheology” fits the favored luciferian model by espousing “ancient aliens” (if it is legitimate truth, why do several TV networks owned by Discovery corp. run so many shows pushing it? these are the same channels that have run apologetics for freemasonry and similar filth.) and the like, which is not part of legitimate awakening, but further disinformation tactics, and shilled by the likes of maxwell and murdock.
3. The fisherman’s ring is emblematic of Solomon’s ring, which was supposed to have been used for control of demons. It is very likely the pope took to wearing such a ring for the purpose of winning judaics to the catholic church, as is usual for catholicism. That is, integrate or make “catholic”-oriented substitutes for, some things in order to win converts. The speculation that it has anything to do with astrology is completely untenable.
4.The entire subject of UFOs is similarly disinformation, not only is the “ancient alien” premise untenable, but it also makes the mistake of pressuming ancient mankind to be far more savage (just like mainstream science does.) than he actually would have been, and the use of “aliens” to describe origins of human knowledge and cultures assumes complete ignorance of a spiritual world entirely, to say nothing of it entering into a needless unending chain of backtracking; that is to say, if the aliens taught mankind such and so, who taught the aliens that, if it was more aliens then where did they learn it? etc. It is also a primary pillar of evolutionary theory, which itself is an old doctrine of the vile mystery schools. There are no “alien craft” only man-made vehicles of higher tech than the public is aware of, and manifestations of entities that would properly be called demonic or devilish, for the purpose of reinforcing this delusion.
5. Some correction of the understanding of Mythology and the deity called dagon is required here, for one, ignore any and all fictional accoutns, such as lovecraft etc. for two, Do your own research, don’t take what some luciferian huckster like Murdock says at face value, investigate any and all claims made, and use your head. (I would suggest looking at the
http://home.comcast.net/~chris.s/canaanite-faq.html canaanite FAq and the
http://home.comcast.net/~chris.s/sumer-faq.html as a start, granted there are problems therein, but the research is far above and removed from murdocks pseudo-scholarship and vacuous syncretism.)
6. holy C = holy See, nothing to do with a body of water or ocean, such wordplay is fertile ground for gross misinterpretations, besides the popularity of implying that the pope would be the antichrist, frankly, he cannot fit the required role, as catholicism no longer has such a vast powerbase as it used to, the antichrist is much more likely to be baha’i or one of the new age sub-sects that like to try to syncretize all belief systems into a “new world religion”, the pope is likely to be a false prophet at most.
What this article is doing, whether the author is aware of it or not, is initiating people into the lower levels of the luciferian hierarchy that alice bailey spoke of, which in case anyone isn’t clear on it, *is not a good thing*, and quite counter to awakening, and rather putting people into a deeper coma. Always examine all claims made by anyone at any time, and put in more than a cursory 10 minute google search, Truth doesn’t fear investigation.
