If LHL & TT do not respond to Hazel's request for referendum, it means...

[zeddy]

bro,

this thing take time to grow. Singaporeans are still not sure join protest and it takes time to overcome the ISA fear.

Singaporean balls are growing bigger 强者胜 by the days and soon you shall see 300,000. Already 1 GRC went to oppo is a good sign there is hope to change for the better.

No need to call Kinana 'Bro' lah.. Just call Kinana 'Pok'.. Short form for Bapok..

Then wait till your balls grow bigger la.

I think Forummer Tanwahtiu don't have to wait for his balls to grow bigger.. His balls is already mature enough..

Since you're a balls connoisseur, you can PM him to do a QC check on his fully grown ripe balls.. LOL..LOL..LOL..

 

[Froggy]

If LHL & TT do not respond to Hazel's request for referendum, it means.....................Democracy is at work

- it means Hazel Poa = represent 1 person (ok ok ok maybe she represented 56,885 voters from her defeated CCK GRC)
- it means Hazel Poa and her team are not liked by 89,710 voters in CCK GRC
- it means Hazel Poa represents ZERO constituency
- it means sinkies got what they voted for
- it means under the constitution everything's prime and proper

and many many more it means

Singaporeans are really fucked by this government why? Because they had chosen to be fucked and this is what it means simply, nothing complicated.

If PM Lee Hsien Loong and President Tony Tan did not and do not intend to reply to Hazel Poa's request for the PM and President to call for a referendum on the 6.9M, it shows the contempt they have for the people. After the protest at Hong Lim Park on 16 Feb 2013, do they not realise that Singaporeans are very sick and tired of the current over-crowdedness and that we are very unhappy with the "no hue" = "can't be bothered" attitude of the PAP government?

- http://feedmetothefish.blogspot.sg/2013/02/more-singaporeans-should-be-ripples.html

 

[Rumpole]

Does Singapore's political framework allow for a referendum? If yes, what are the criterias?

Hi,

The Constitution of the Republic of Singapore makes it mandatory to conduct a referendum in only one situation – surrender, transfer or relinquishment of sovereignty by way of merger, incorporation or in any other manner whatsoever.

Article 6 provides that:

(1) There shall be —

(a) no surrender or transfer, either wholly or in part, of the sovereignty of the Republic of Singapore as an independent nation, whether by way of merger or incorporation with any other sovereign state or with any Federation, Confederation, country or territory or in any other manner whatsoever; and

(b) no relinquishment of control over the Singapore Police Force or the Singapore Armed Forces,

unless such surrender, transfer or relinquishment has been supported, at a national referendum, by not less than two-thirds of the total number of votes cast by the electors registered under the Parliamentary Elections Act (Cap 218).

It is of course not guaranteed that a legal challenge invoking Article 6 will succeed. As you might be aware, Singapore got independence by accident - through being kicked out of Malaysia. So, me thinks this Article was inserted in order to make it more difficult for Malaysia to force Singapore to merge again by say cutting off our water and food supplies. However, this is the ONLY provision in our laws that make it COMPULSORY to call a referendum and besides the term "sovereignty" is not defined in the Constitution.

For more, please see my thread in the Political folder @ http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?...overnment-to-Hold-a-Referendum-on-6-9-million!

What is the position in Germany? Under what circumstances would it be compulsory for the German government to hold a referendum?

 

[Kinana]

You see? Those who talk about referendum, including Hazel po and her team of NSP don't even know the constitution. Who will listen to such people?

 

[TeamDrifter]

If LHL & TT do not respond to Hazel's request for referendum, it means...Hazel Poa got to go get enough sinkies to sign a petition to start a referendum something like 1 million signatures no kidding.

 

[saratogas]

Who cares about Hazel... Get Nicole to cry for Singapore & many people hearts will melt!

 

[Reddog]

If PM Lee Hsien Loong and President Tony Tan did not and do not intend to reply to Hazel Poa's request for the PM and President to call for a referendum on the 6.9M, it shows the contempt they have for the people. After the protest at Hong Lim Park on 16 Feb 2013, do they not realise that Singaporeans are very sick and tired of the current over-crowdedness and that we are very unhappy with the "no hue" = "can't be bothered" attitude of the PAP government?

- http://feedmetothefish.blogspot.sg/2013/02/more-singaporeans-should-be-ripples.html

Why should powerful elites bother with lesser mortals, who are daft sheep(s) ? Twits.

 

[WongMengMeng]

You see? Those who talk about referendum, including Hazel po and her team of NSP don't even know the constitution. Who will listen to such people?

It may well be that a deliberate policy to grant citizenship to massive numbers of foreigners to the extent that the proportion of native Singaporeans as a percentage of the total resident population will be greatly reduced is one of the mischiefs that Article 6 is supposed to guard against. A Queen's Counsel may well be able to put forward good and cogent arguments that such a policy is covered by Article 6 and therefore it has to be endorsed by a two thirds majority in a referendum before the government of the day is allowed to implement it.

Only one situation where a referendum is compulsory does not mean that a referendum cannot be held in other situations. If Sinkies want a referendum, they should demand it loud and clear. Should 3,000 be not enough to strike some fear in the hearts of the Scums in White, then maybe 30,000 or 300,000 would! Then it becomes a question of the political cost of not holding a referendum when the people have already clearly expressed their desire that in their opinion one must be held. If the swing is large enough, even the importation of 30,000 new citizens per year between now and 2016 will not save the PAP.

This is a bread-and-butter issue as opposed to some airy fairy ideas like democracy or accountability - right up the average Sinkie's alley. The swing should be quite large, enough for me to consider changing sides.

 

[Kinana]

It won't affect sovereignty at all cos foreigners don't get to vote, don't police, soldier or get into political offices. So no issue at all

 

[rusty]

Then wait till your balls grow bigger la.

Honey,
Every time you fonder my balls, they actually shrink
They become harder and tighter when you start licking
The only thing that grow bigger during your job is my dick
When I am done with you my balls will relax like tau pok (dried bean-curd)
When someone's balls grow bigger....he has a problem ....Hernia
You like Hernia?

 

[wMulew]

Dumbfuck opposition supporting retard. Who is Hazel, an unelected loser. If anyone is going to call for referendum it's WP. Did they do that? NO!!!!

 

[Rumpole]

... foreigners don't get to vote ...

Are you deliberately concealing some piece of information?

Foreigners who are granted citizenship get the right to vote.