IF I AM SCDF (ex) CHIEF LAWYER....

RWSSLOTS

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
715
Points
43
I would advise him to admit to all the sexual acts but then delinked it to the contracts that were entered into between SCDF and the companies whom the gals work for.

Its not criminal to have affairs oustide marriage. Its between consenting adults, not minors or underaged prostitutes.

If defence can successfully show this and cast reasonable doubt, Peter should be ok.
 
but the women involved will expose him, no? back to square one.
 
Even nothing to do with contract he is using his position as SCDF Chief to induce sexual favours from vendors.
For this he should be strip to private rank.
 
Even nothing to do with contract he is using his position as SCDF Chief to induce sexual favours from vendors.
For this he should be strip to private rank.

tat is disciplinary offence within scdf and not a criminal offence of corruption which carries mandatory jail sentence.
 
but the women involved will expose him, no? back to square one.

the women can tell their side of the story. but it is his words against the woman as there are no other witnesses.

all peter needs to show is that he has a sexual addiction problem and now seek medical treatment.
and his sexual addiction does not link to those contracts been given ...tats all
 
the women can tell their side of the story. but it is his words against the woman as there are no other witnesses.

all peter needs to show is that he has a sexual addiction problem and now seek medical treatment.
and his sexual addiction does not link to those contracts been given ...tats all
How about Peter using the oft-used 'BipoLar condition' that many women have done before ?..:confused:
 
How about Peter using the oft-used 'BipoLar condition' that many women have done before ?..:confused:

For bipolar, he will need a very famous psychiatrist as his expert witness.
Else the court will not buy the story.
 
Fuck lah, ask kfc phony tan to give him a lan jiao trophy or medal lah for being such. A good fucker. See? Pappies are also paedopile fuckers. Look at ronron.
 
Overall, not an easy case for defence as the prosecution have 3 witnesses which tends to show a pattern of behaviour of Peter.

But Peter has only 1 chance to turn this around, ie., admit to the sex part but strenously deny the giving of contracts because of the sex.

He needs to show he has a sexual addiction problem and has screwed many other gals who were never suppliers of SCDF. Get a well known psychiatrist as his defence witness. Be steady in court under cross examination. Defence lawyer must cross examine the 3 gals carefully and call them liars...prove that they were horny and that even though they had the intention to seduce Peter, Peter is just a sex addict irrespective of those contracts!
 
Overall, not an easy case for defence as the prosecution have 3 witnesses which tends to show a pattern of behaviour of Peter.

But Peter has only 1 chance to turn this around, ie., admit to the sex part but strenously deny the giving of contracts because of the sex.

He needs to show he has a sexual addiction problem and has screwed many other gals who were never suppliers of SCDF. Get a well known psychiatrist as his defence witness. Be steady in court under cross examination. Defence lawyer must cross examine the 3 gals carefully and call them liars...prove that they were horny and that even though they had the intention to seduce Peter, Peter is just a sex addict irrespective of those contracts!
So pappies hire a sex maniac for the top position of scdf?

KNN, no wonder ronron the paedopile is with the pappies. Members have priviledge.
 
Overall, not an easy case for defence as the prosecution have 3 witnesses which tends to show a pattern of behaviour of Peter.

But Peter has only 1 chance to turn this around, ie., admit to the sex part but strenously deny the giving of contracts because of the sex.

He needs to show he has a sexual addiction problem and has screwed many other gals who were never suppliers of SCDF. Get a well known psychiatrist as his defence witness. Be steady in court under cross examination. Defence lawyer must cross examine the 3 gals carefully and call them liars...prove that they were horny and that even though they had the intention to seduce Peter, Peter is just a sex addict irrespective of those contracts!
With baiL set @$10k, what wouLd your interpretations be then ? ..:confused:;)
 
How about Peter using the oft-used 'BipoLar condition' that many women have done before ?..:confused:

nah! better use the time-tested one _ " Sorry, honest mistake, please let me move on "
 
With baiL set @$10k, what wouLd your interpretations be then ? ..:confused:;)
granting and setting bail amount is based on whether the person is likely to anscond. In this case, Peter's passport has been imponded and there is no reason to believe he will abscond. So 10k is ok.
 
granting and setting bail amount is based on whether the person is likely to anscond. In this case, Peter's passport has been imponded and there is no reason to believe he will abscond. So 10k is ok.

Even 39 year old senior inspector Mark Koh from the police knew how to abscond to avoid a corruption charge.
Don't be too sure about the relatively laojiao and wealthier 50 year old.

And btw, it could be that the women have already confessed and made deals. That's why there is so much details
about their sexual encounters in the press.
 
Even 39 year old senior inspector Mark Koh from the police knew how to abscond to avoid a corruption charge.
Don't be too sure about the relatively laojiao and wealthier 50 year old.

And btw, it could be that the women have already confessed and made deals. That's why there is so much details
about their sexual encounters in the press.

Well, very unlikely Peter will run cos he has even more to lose, his assets etc will be sort of in limbo. Mark Koh probably has nothing to lose and lots of debts.

On the women, they may have confessed but it is one sided story. So it is still open to a good defence lawyer to cross examined and break them down in court.
 
Well, very unlikely Peter will run cos he has even more to lose, his assets etc will be sort of in limbo. Mark Koh probably has nothing to lose and lots of debts.

On the women, they may have confessed but it is one sided story. So it is still open to a good defence lawyer to cross examined and break them down in court.

They will also look at the contracts and how they were secured.
Could also be that Peter will confess for a lighter sentence also.
 
I went to SCDF and some high rank officials are making fun of their former boss
 
They will also look at the contracts and how they were secured.
Could also be that Peter will confess for a lighter sentence also.

Peter cannot be that stupid to rule or decision make the contracts himself.

If so, Prosecution might need more witnesses in the rank and file of SCDF to show that Peter has interfered in the decision to award these contracts which were bidded by these 3 horny gals. Someone has to betray Peter or else the prosecution case looks 50/ 50.

Will see which other witnesses prosecution put as witness(es)...
 
Back
Top