if angmoh had not drug China, both are Superpower today...webshows

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
37,095
Points
113
A couple of years ago, it was still a general belief in China's online video industry that working with TV stations means greater influence and a better chance of success. But now China's major video websites have already been independently making programs that, with ever growing investments, are as appealing as TV productions and create even more social interest.

Ma Dong, former China Central Television producer and now leading video website iQiyi's content director, calls the period now the "golden time for purely Internet-based entertainment shows".

He told a recent industry forum, hosted by iQiyi, that this is because video websites are becoming more recognized as show producers rather than merely show players, which gives them more credibility to attract sponsorship.


http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/culture/2015-06/11/content_20968035.htm
 
Without the British behind fixing China the Sassons are nothing and are their dogs.

FAQ: Who started to drug Singapore and Borneo? Sassons or the evil British governor of Singapore?



Evil British are good at using arseholes to do dirty jobs like subcontractors which they later denied any wrong doings and have no blood in their hands. Brit fixed Palestinian giving lands to Israel and split Pakistan and India before leaving.

Without drug money there will be no British Empire (WEIS) and their rapidly industrial revolution advancement in a short 150 years. WEIS -Wales, English, Irish, Scottish) are 4 gangsters forming the British Empire to rapidly expansion their Empire never seen before in history in a short 150 years.

What has never occurred to us was as British government f Singapore they drug their non-British Subjects, mainly Overseas Chinese 华侨人 for easy drug money to finance their British Empire expansion from late 1800s to 1963 Malaysia Independence.

It was known that before the Brit leave they burnt their government books and records in Singapore for 3 months.

Today, the British are shamed to claim glory as good government for Singapore? They have to quietly and lanlan leave Singapore when told to, and never want to have their past be remembered and glorified.

Now we know why their bloody Sir Stamford Raffles statue is black color (looks opium color) too ashamed of their past atrocities against the non-white British Subjects, your forefathers.


We learned that the opium trade was freely indulged in, at Singapore, fostered by the Government. Singapore is a large city of about 300,000 inhabitants, a great number of which are Chinese. It has wide, beautiful streets, fine government buildings, magnificent quays and docks-a splendid European city at the outposts of the Orient. We found that a large part of its revenue is derived from the opium traffic-from the sale of opium, and from license fees derived from shops where opium may be purchased, or from divans where it may be smoked. The customers are mainly Chinese

http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/om/om4.htm


'allo 'allo, the Sassoons are immoral drug trafficking Jews ...........
 
not only drugged but oso bullied with powers of UK, USA, Japan, France & Germany - all cowardly muttafarkers!!
 
The British led the fall of China with massive smuggled opiums and other nations easily joined in the frenzy feeding.

About time to held the British Empire accountably for economic loss and opprunties for China to rise to 1st world country in the past 150 years.

What CommonWealth is the British talking about? There was never a commonwealth in evil angmoh land. China was a wealthy country and stealing China wealth maybe.



not only drugged but oso bullied with powers of UK, USA, Japan, France & Germany - all cowardly muttafarkers!!
 
Qianlong was not a good emperor. If he was there would not have been a He Shen; he would have seen that there was much to learn from the Western Barbarians; et cetera.

Long Hair has undergone shifts in his political stance over the years, from Maoist, to Trotskyist, to activist democrat, but underpinning it has always been a distrust of authority that some would call healthy, and that others do call pathological.

It's no coincidence that the revolutionaries Leung most admires, such as Trotsky and Che Guevara, are revolutionaries who have failed. Power always has the potential to corrupt:

"They all failed. The paradox of the revolutionary hero is that when Communists succeed, they rewrite history. And then it's all fake; Actually, there should be genuine democracy to do the checks and balances. You cannot rely on the leaders."

There are some also hints in the conversation that some of the distrust of authority may also relate back even further than his political awakening.

"Since my mama needed to work as an amah, I was sent to a family of her relatives, and the family was big. They had seven children, so I became the black sheep. I got all the blame. That's why I like to read a lot, because I think reading is a very, very silent world. Nobody bothers you. You betray the book, the book cannot betray you."


[video=youtube;wqocxQIzKN8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqocxQIzKN8[/video]
 
Back
Top