- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
Lessons unlearnt by the PAP
The PAP's attempt at framing this election in their terms has really failed completely. One wonders how the party did not learn their lessons from last year's elections. In fact, they seem to be running around like headless chickens, where one member succeeds, another resets it to zero. For your convenience, let me list some of the most striking cases of utter lack of communication and teamwork.
1.The campaign slogan "Always there for you" is ironic and in fact detrimental to their whole campaign, considering how the PAP has stated on black and white that Hougang will continue to be discriminated against in National Policies and Upgrading. The insincerity of the entire campaign is thus highlighted and amplified. It is truly cognitive dissonance at a campaign level. At this point of time, it's been wholly abandoned to concentrate on throwing m&d at Png Eng Huat.
2.DPM Tharman saying it was a "Local" and not a "National" election, which was quickly ignored by the majority of citizens, and even the PAP has abandoned fashioning the debate in this light. Last I (and many others) checked, Hougang does not belong in its own plane of existence, whether the PAP likes it or not.
3.Desmond Choo's proclamations of independence, but with every media release showing him in tow with senior PAP leaders, including both the DPMs and even the PM! Other PAP members like Baey Yam Keng are even campaigning for him. (And according to Pritam on Sunday evening's rally, even Ho Ching was seen with the PM!)
4.Desmond Choo saying he is "focusing on the voters." While this naivety is rather cute and can allow him to earn political points, it will only be so if DPM Teo and other members of the PAP would listen to him (fat hope) and stop going after the WP candidate Png Eng Huat. There's a crude saying in hokkien for points 3 and 4: Lam Pah Pah Lan.
EDIT: On a side note, a local and national debate is a rubbish categorisation, and issues shouldn't be pidgeonholed as such. What would the MRT breakdowns entail. Is it national, local or both? If there isn't a clear distinction between the two, why bother coming up with a category like that in the first place?[/COLOR
facebook.lim-jialiang
The PAP's attempt at framing this election in their terms has really failed completely. One wonders how the party did not learn their lessons from last year's elections. In fact, they seem to be running around like headless chickens, where one member succeeds, another resets it to zero. For your convenience, let me list some of the most striking cases of utter lack of communication and teamwork.
1.The campaign slogan "Always there for you" is ironic and in fact detrimental to their whole campaign, considering how the PAP has stated on black and white that Hougang will continue to be discriminated against in National Policies and Upgrading. The insincerity of the entire campaign is thus highlighted and amplified. It is truly cognitive dissonance at a campaign level. At this point of time, it's been wholly abandoned to concentrate on throwing m&d at Png Eng Huat.
2.DPM Tharman saying it was a "Local" and not a "National" election, which was quickly ignored by the majority of citizens, and even the PAP has abandoned fashioning the debate in this light. Last I (and many others) checked, Hougang does not belong in its own plane of existence, whether the PAP likes it or not.
3.Desmond Choo's proclamations of independence, but with every media release showing him in tow with senior PAP leaders, including both the DPMs and even the PM! Other PAP members like Baey Yam Keng are even campaigning for him. (And according to Pritam on Sunday evening's rally, even Ho Ching was seen with the PM!)
4.Desmond Choo saying he is "focusing on the voters." While this naivety is rather cute and can allow him to earn political points, it will only be so if DPM Teo and other members of the PAP would listen to him (fat hope) and stop going after the WP candidate Png Eng Huat. There's a crude saying in hokkien for points 3 and 4: Lam Pah Pah Lan.
EDIT: On a side note, a local and national debate is a rubbish categorisation, and issues shouldn't be pidgeonholed as such. What would the MRT breakdowns entail. Is it national, local or both? If there isn't a clear distinction between the two, why bother coming up with a category like that in the first place?[/COLOR
facebook.lim-jialiang
Last edited: