• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

How to reduce income inequality in Singapore

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
64,924
Points
113
Find out who the lowest paid employee is in your company and tell the payroll department to transfer 10% of your salary every month to the poor guy.

If it happens to be you, you don't have to do anything. Just sit back and your pay will go up with no effort on your part required.
 
Rather say it this way.

Why don't reduce the income of the very top by 50% which is good cos anyway these bastards are not working effectively and by reducing their pay, they still have plenty money left for them to slack. LOL
 
Better still why not everyone get the same pay? Sure then we will have income equality then. Go all the way la, why half way?
 
Answer is very simple. Pay every citizen's Cpf back to them at age 55.

In this way, the poorer ones can have more at an earlier age. For the rich, it doesn't make any difference.

However, as it is now, OUR Cpf is being locked-up till 65 and beyond where they will give us back in drips and drabs !!!:mad::oIo:
 
I am not against income inequality.

I am against income inequity. There's a difference.



Find out who the lowest paid employee is in your company and tell the payroll department to transfer 10% of your salary every month to the poor guy.

If it happens to be you, you don't have to do anything. Just sit back and your pay will go up with no effort on your part required.
 
Better still why not everyone get the same pay? Sure then we will have income equality then. Go all the way la, why half way?

Better still fucktard, why don't everyone works WITHOUT PAY!!

Since there is NO INCOME, where the inequality or equality?
:D
 
Find out who the lowest paid employee is in your company and tell the payroll department to transfer 10% of your salary every month to the poor guy.

If it happens to be you, you don't have to do anything. Just sit back and your pay will go up with no effort on your part required.

Waiting for that to happen is like you finally becoming a nice guy.
 
Find out who the lowest paid employee is in your company and tell the payroll department to transfer 10% of your salary every month to the poor guy.

If it happens to be you, you don't have to do anything. Just sit back and your pay will go up with no effort on your part required.

What's the problem with that? It has been going on for the past ten years but in the opposite direction. We are just setting it right as before.
 
Absolutely, and the best person to address this issue is the labour chief.........................


Asking zorro to represent the workers is like asking Goh meng seng to be rational. Pigs would sooner fly.
 
I am not against income inequality.

I am against income inequity. There's a difference.

It is very difficult to define inequality because we are comparing two different things. To Dr Chee, the PM is worth only 5 times that of the average man. To LTK, it is maybe 25 times. But to LHL, it should be 50 to 60 times. His father says it should be that for life. Kinana will say anything that LHL says at the moment is correct. If LHL changes his mind, it will also be correct. So which figure is equitable? Only inequality can be measured absolutely and we can agree that there will be inequality but how much? Only when the lower end thinks that it is acceptable. Otherwise we have a problem. In a sense, I agree with Cruxx. It has something to do with no poverty.
 
Last edited:
It is very difficult to define inequality because we are comparing two different things. To Dr Chee, the PM is worth only 5 times that of the average man. To LTK, it is maybe 25 times. But to LHL, it should be 50 to 60 times. His father says it should be that for life. Kinana will say anything that LHL says at the moment is correct. If LHL changes his mind, it will also be correct. So which figure is equitable? Only inequality can be measured absolutely and we can agree that there will be inequality but how much? Only when the lower end thinks that it is acceptable. Otherwise we have a problem

Your example is still about inequality, but just the magnitude of it.

Inequity is when a person who spends his time doing jackshit and stating the obvious and making motherhood statements, makes a multi million dollar salary. You don't even have to consider magnitude and valuation concepts when considering such a scenario.
 
Your example is still about inequality, but just the magnitude of it.

Inequity is when a person who spends his time doing jackshit and stating the obvious and making motherhood statements, makes a multi million dollar salary. You don't even have to consider magnitude and valuation concepts when considering such a scenario.

When business is doing well, the owner can always shake leg, talk cock and do nothing if he wants to. Nothing wrong. His prerogative.
 
Last edited:
Your example is still about inequality, but just the magnitude of it.

Inequity is when a person who spends his time doing jackshit and stating the obvious and making motherhood statements, makes a multi million dollar salary. You don't even have to consider magnitude and valuation concepts when considering such a scenario.

In other words, you are saying a PM is worth less than the average man. Your definition of equity is a ratio even lower than Dr Chee's. I thought we are rating the job size and not the person doing the job. If the person doing the job is inept, please kick him out. Kinana, would you agree with that or is LHL always right?
 
Last edited:
Kim Jong Il and Kim Il Sung solve the inequality problem ages ago. Those with an issue can migrate to N Korea
 
Back
Top