Serious How SPH helped downfall of PAP

[Confuseous]

By performing the self-imposed role of being an external publication of the
PAP PR department, they helped the opposition by publishing "read only the
good news" articles for their masters.

From news reports to editorial "opinion" pieces to the selective use of readers'
letters AND the biased editing of these letters to serve their needs, they helped
readers to see for themselves that the emperors had no clothes.

What do you think?

 

[Leongsam]

I think SPH is just boring so people go elsewhere nowadays.

 

[Confuseous]

And they get their news sooner too, if they just go into yahoo or msn sites.

 

[poore]

and Stomp.com another joker,sat and sun off for a online website

 

[myfoot123]

By performing the self-imposed role of being an external publication of the
PAP PR department, they helped the opposition by publishing "read only the
good news" articles for their masters.

From news reports to editorial "opinion" pieces to the selective use of readers'
letters AND the biased editing of these letters to serve their needs, they helped
readers to see for themselves that the emperors had no clothes.

What do you think?

If SPH cannot even exceed the credibility of this forum, how else can they compete with the vast social media other there? In fact, I have never touch a single page of Straits Times during the whole of post and pre GE. It goes to show how useless the paper is, just like PAP PAPER GENERAL with form but no substance.

 

[steffychun]

Where are the Chua girls?

 

[laksaboy]

By performing the self-imposed role of being an external publication of the
PAP PR department, they helped the opposition by publishing "read only the
good news" articles for their masters.

From news reports to editorial "opinion" pieces to the selective use of readers'
letters AND the biased editing of these letters to serve their needs, they helped
readers to see for themselves that the emperors had no clothes.

What do you think?

Indeed. The younger voters have wised up to what a piece of shit the 158th media truly is. Worse than Kazakhstan.

Don't forget Mothershit, the same PAP shill media masquerading as Buzzfeed-style 'alternative media'. If you want proof, watch the promoted (sponsored?) links on Youtube whenever there is major breaking news in Sinkieland: content from Mothershit, Gov dot SG and CNA/Straits Times always get pushed to the top.

By the way SPH, how are the subscription numbers? Any takers for your much ballyhooed Samsung tablet? Are your paywalls working?

http://theindependent.sg/sph-media-business-pre-tax-profits-plunge-by-76-8-in-first-quarter-of-2020/