- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
Chitchat How nasty D Trump will die as and leave his name behind...
- Thread starter tanwahtiu
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
Glad that you understand the meaning of impeachment .You don't even understand the meaning of the word "impeach".
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
Obstruction of justice . Cover up . Denial . President rule above laws. Are these the very freedoms that the constitution of USA guarantees?
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
If Trump steps down he can't be impeached because he is no longer the President.
If he is still the President impeachment won't remove him from office because the senate will not convict him.
All these accusations have already been debunked.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
There is no conclusion from Mueller report. But Trump drew his own conclusions that he was completely exonerated . Reminds me of a self check self approved system somewhere ....
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
The Mueller report found nothing so therefore there is nothing. Spin doctors for the democrats can try to change the narrative but they can't change the facts.
If the Mueller report had found collusion and obstruction of justice the report would have said so.
There is no self check involved. Mueller was appointed by the democrats to check on Trump. Nothing was found. End of story.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
That is not the conclusion the Mueller report reaches . They have intentionally taken the approach not to indict the President under a OLC opinion that a sitting President cannot stand trial and hence the conclusion is ambiguous. What is actually meant is that Congress should do their job to impeach the President or he should be indicted when he steps down from Presidency.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
The dems are clutching at straws. They contend that Trump put undue pressure on officials by claiming the investigation was a witch hunt etc thereby making it difficult for investigators to do their jobs.
They also try to blur the lines between Trump the property developer and Trump the politician.
The truth is far more straight forward and that is they could find nothing criminal. Case closed.
Congress can go ahead and impeach if they want but the senate will never convict so the whole process will be nothing but a waste of time.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
There was an incidence when Trump ordered the ex AG to take Mueller out of the investigation. It didn’t happen. What happened subsequently was that Mueller was hampered greatly in the investigation by the President ordering his officials to make it difficult for Mueller. Good thing was that most of the White House officials had the sense not to take his orders. But by not following the orders, the President somehow got away of his irresponsibility . Either he is damned smart or he is damned lucky .
Dickhead. Yr good friend will be out b4 G20 in Japan...
Angmoh US are getting embarrased having a loe educated, liar, cheat and pussy eater represent them in world stage. Enough said say the angmoh...
Angmoh US are getting embarrased having a loe educated, liar, cheat and pussy eater represent them in world stage. Enough said say the angmoh...
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
I don't believe half of that shit. Where are your sources?
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
Trump is the best President ever! He'll be around for a long time so you might as well get used to it.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
You don’t have to believe. I am not here to convince you . I am here to give an objective view of what went into the Mueller investigation and show that Trump is not as what he himself declared that he is completely exonerated from the allegation of collusion with the Russians and cleared of the charge on obstruction of justice.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
Your view is not objective. It is clouded by the amount of fake news that is hashed and rehashed ad nauseam. The news organisations don't bother to verify information anymore. They indulge in wild speculation to suit the political agenda of their masters.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,715
- Points
- 113
I think you're just jealous because Trump is way more successful than you are.
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
Love this one from the Brits.
Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"
Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."
Someone asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?"
Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England, wrote this magnificent response:
"A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
* Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
* You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set."
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 5,970
- Points
- 113
Similar threads
