• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

How many uncles and aunties are in such poor state ?

kopiuncle

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
13,598
Points
0
BEIJING: When Wu Rui's 12-year-old daughter died she lost not just the only child she would ever have but also her source of security and support in old age.

Today the 55-year-old takes care of herself and her own elderly parents on a paltry pension in a ramshackle two-room home, living in fear of medical emergencies she has no way to pay for.

China's one-child policy normally leaves four grandparents and two parents relying on a single caretaker for old age -- and bereaved families with none.

An estimated one million families nationwide have lost their sole descendant since the measure took effect in 1980, and another four to seven million are expected to do so in the next 20 to 30 years.

Many, like Wu, will have no one to help them through the frailties or medical costs of old age.

"If I have a big illness then I probably won't have enough," she says quietly. "For sure there will be difficulties."
 
This is really sad. If you have no children to support you and you do not have any savings when you are old, you are in a terrible state. That is why our enlightened government has enforced savings and keep the CPF safe and sound.
 
To achieve this goal of looking after the elderly sick and the poor, the Medisave Minimum may have to increase. This is good for all of you. The Minimum Sum will also have to increase to make sure that when you retire, you have some allowances to keep you going. This is again another way of helping the Singaporeans. That is why CPF is good for Singaporeans. I love the CPF! It works well for me. I am sure it will also work well for you. It's okay if you don't share the same views.

We can always agree to disagree.It's okay. But please don't send in the rabid dogs to attack me. Thank you.
 
PAP need not go thru all these measures if they did not kick off the 'Stop at Two campaign.

We would all be better off if they did not institute CPF. Its because they want to hoard our money, these problems crop up now.

They started the problem and now burden us with more hare-brained solution? Singaoreans will be better off without PAP now.
 
I believe the Stop At Two was a economic necessity. We didn't know and we were desperate .How were we going to feed the millions? So the policy was enforced. But of course, the economy grew and the country prospered and we needed more Singaporeans.That was a lapse - an honest mistake.

CPF I believe is still relevant for some.The rich and the wealthy I don't think they really bother about CPF. Many of my rich and wealthy friends don't even bother to withdraw the money at all...and they are getting richer because CPF pays good interest. So if ther is no "enforced" savings, many retirees will be in dire straits now. The CPF has diversified its uses/purposes and I believe it is doing all these for the good of Singaporeans.
 
PAP need not go thru all these measures if they did not kick off the 'Stop at Two campaign.

We would all be better off if they did not institute CPF. Its because they want to hoard our money, these problems crop up now.

They started the problem and now burden us with more hare-brained solution? Singaoreans will be better off without PAP now.

What they are doing NOW is eradicating the problem..getting 'rid of SINgaporeans' NOW, by flooding ( ahh! PONDING) the country with FT's..so that more SINgaporeans will be 'dropping off like flies'..
 
What they are doing NOW is eradicating the problem..getting 'rid of SINgaporeans' NOW, by flooding ( ahh! PONDING) the country with FT's..so that more SINgaporeans will be 'dropping off like flies'..

Perhaps a bit too strong an argument. I don't think Singaporeans can be easily eradicated. Ponding the country with FTs I do agree but I think the Government will have to balance the needs. Otherwise, Singaporeans will be out-numbered soon . With falling fertility and with the inability to replace ourselves, the day will come Singaporeans will be replaced. Possible.
 
What they are doing NOW is eradicating the problem..getting 'rid of SINgaporeans' NOW, by flooding ( ahh! PONDING) the country with FT's..so that more SINgaporeans will be 'dropping off like flies'..

They have been doing this eradication thing for years. We are fast becoming a minority.
 
Country side Chinese kids are so under nourished that most of them will just drop dead when they become adults.

Fat singaporean kids still want to be so picky about food.

Kiam pah those parents dunno how to raise their children.
 
Back
Top