how do they define "a honest mistake"?

[leetahbar]

i ve been deeply puzzled n bewildered by this term: HONEST MISTAKE. to aggravate matter, the suffix LET'S MOVE ON.

how do the pap define A HONEST MISTAKE and how can they thick-skinnedly LET'S MOVE ON?

it seem that if a mistake occurs whether it's honest or dishonest in their unique exquisite circle, they can willingly accept. they do not resort to HEAD ROLLING or STERN REPRIMANDING but they would gleefully exclaim: LET'S MOVE ON....

but if it were to happen to a common peasant, "a honest mistake committed", not only his head shall roll, other repetitive punishment would set in too.

pap shall always be pap while peasants remain as peasants whose fate has to be taunted and played about by the bloody pap!

 

[Leongsam]

It will all depend upon who made the mistake.

 

[leetahbar]

the pap said: MUST PAY HIGHLY ( correct term should be : obscenely) THEIR KAKIS IF NOT THEY'D CORRUPT. actually, they should use the more suitable word for CORRUPT. they should have said SIN.

there are many recent embarrassing news report about high position, bigtime influential chiefy and of course OBSCENELY paid civil servants who sinned. corruption was a misnomer word here to describe them maybe perhaps to choo wee khiang.

those horny married influential pap officers sinned. SEX was their primary cause for downfall. money corruption could be secondary.

so is this another "honest mistake"? are we really moving on??

in their inner circle, their SIN unless uncovered or exposed remain a NON-mistake. but once discovered and exposed, it would be re-termed as A HONEST MISTAKE. for the damage control, LET'S MOVE ON is surely added.

that's pap! they are paid to cum out with excuses upon excuses for their goof-ups and whammies.

it must be a national"s HONEST MISTAKE to have pay them obscenely. what to do? LET'S MOVE ON......:(

 

[leetahbar]

It will all depend upon who made the mistake.

mistake to the pap is always classified HONEST MISTAKE if the defaulter belongs to their inner circle of exquisite elites.

mistake to the peasants is MISTAKE. there is no honest, dishonest, unwitting or whatever crap adjective to exalt the MISTAKE.

 

[Jlokta]

i ve been deeply puzzled n bewildered by this term: HONEST MISTAKE. to aggravate matter, the suffix LET'S MOVE ON.

how do the pap define A HONEST MISTAKE and how can they thick-skinnedly LET'S MOVE ON?

Shorty Wong not accounting for MSK's escape, thats an honest mistake.

 

[leetahbar]

army boys blur blur get killed during training is the most HONEST MISTAKE. nobody especially the defence minister needs to shoulder part of the responsibility. LET'S MOVE ON....it's the peasants' boy's life lost. it's outside their exqusite elite club.

 

[Leongsam]

mistake to the peasants is MISTAKE. there is no honest, dishonest, unwitting or whatever crap adjective to exalt the MISTAKE.

Any mistakes made by peasants are usually classified as a criminal offenses unless proven otherwise.

 

[leetahbar]

SMRT breakdowns. another very HONEST MISTAKE. do we see heads rolling? NO! they still get their million$ while peasants have a hard time for themselves and for explaining to their bosses for being late.

hundreds of thousands of peasants badly affected. but it was definitely a very HONEST MISTAKE cos peasants do not belong to the inner circle of exquisite elites.

does any pap mps voice vehemently and demand concrete censorship? NO! it's the pap exquisite elite club.:oIo:

 

[leetahbar]

Any mistakes made by peasants are usually classified as a criminal offenses unless proven otherwise.

obviously, there are 2 sets of law in this land. one for the elites - THE LET'S MOVE ON LAW. the other for the peasants: YOU DIE YOUR BUSINESS law.

 

[Capano2121]

Any mistakes made by peasants are usually classified as a criminal offenses unless proven otherwise.

It should be any mistakes made by peasants are classified as criminal offence, PERIOD!

 

[leetahbar]

for any ns boys killed during training, the gov should review their pitiful compensation to his parents. if they can pay themselves so obscenely, they can surely pay for a person's life. $5k is not the value for raising a kid and have him killed in NS. unless the compensation is increased to say, $200k or more, gov would always take a peasant's life to be cheap.

WHY DOESN'T ANY MPS DARE TO VOICE THAT OUT? it's about time. precious innocent lives from aspiring boys are lost. even with $200K compensation, the grieve of the parents losing their son forever can never be appeased.

 

[Capano2121]

obviously, there are 2 sets of law in this land. one for the elites - THE LET'S MOVE ON LAW. the other for the peasants: YOU DIE YOUR BUSINESS law.

There's only one set of law in this land! And it doesn't apply to the PAP dogs as they are above the law!

 

[leetahbar]

There's only one set of law in this land! And it doesn't apply to the PAP dogs as they are above the law!

let us all chip in now to help remind hougangers NOT TO VOTE THE PAP.

we do not want to commit another HONEST MISTAKE and then have a bloody hard time to LET'S MOVE ON.

 

[geylangchickenloyangduck]

nah beh....the pimp tell me the kwey is above 18, so i take my pimp's word for it and fuck the kwey, her neh neh are large, her CB got hair and I have no reason she is not 18. A honest mistake?

 

[Leongsam]

obviously, there are 2 sets of law in this land. one for the elites -

There's nothing wrong with that. Position must have its privileges or what's the point.

 

[BuiKia]

it means "bona fide mistake". A mistake that is unintentional.

 

[leetahbar]

nah beh....the pimp tell me the kwey is above 18, so i take my pimp's word for it and fuck the kwey, her neh neh are large, her CB got hair and I have no reason she is not 18. A honest mistake?

if they have their elite member in the teeko group, it would be a HONEST MISTAKE. all the teekors would be spared. but suay suay, there isn't any so they hantam. howard shaw wasn't spared too. think he goes against the elite club.

 

[leetahbar]

There's nothing wrong with that. Position must have its privileges or what's the point.

this phrase sounds like the old kopitiam: PAYING MEMBERS HAVE THEIR PRIVILEGES (from getting banned)

 

[Leongsam]

this phrase sounds like the old kopitiam: PAYING MEMBERS HAVE THEIR PRIVILEGES (from getting banned)

Of course! It goes without saying. If I implemented paid membership in this forum, I'd have to bestow privileges too or nobody would be bothered to open their wallets.

Money talks everywhere.

 

[leetahbar]

Of course! It goes without saying. If I implemented paid membership in this forum, I'd have to bestow privileges too or nobody would be bothered to open their wallets.

Money talks everywhere.

precisely! u just hit the nail on the head.

if one got $, it's law on his side. if no $, then may god bless u - it's a honest mistake from god. better move on.