• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

House Speaker has no clue on her role in a Westminister democracy

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
27,906
Points
113
Speaker Halimah Yacob wraps up 9-day Budget debate

Singapolitics
Friday, Mar 15, 2013

SINGAPORE - Madam Halimah Yacob's speech at the close of the Budget debate:

Let me first thank the Leader of the House for his kind words of support and encouragement.

I would also like to thank all the Honourable Members for your cooperation, which has enabled us to bring this Budget debate to a fruitful conclusion. This House agrees that a conclusion of the debate is but only a starting point. Much work has to be done to carry through the many policies and programmes that you have so robustly debated over the span of two weeks.

The focus of this Budget is on the elderly, the low-income and the young. The need to remain globally competitive is clear, yet this House also reaffirms the need for crafting of policies and their implementation to be done in a manner that benefits, involves and engages Singaporeans. So there were palatable policy shifts announced this year in many areas. The debate this year also marks quite a shift in one other respect.

I have yet to sit through a debate where the word 'consultation' had popped up so frequently - 33 times to be exact. This shows the strong desire on the part of policymakers to involve Singaporeans more in shaping their own destiny. On the whole, I find your speeches to be of high quality and thoughtful, passionate and colourful even - with many real life examples.

This is a serious debate and you have taken great pains to address the people's concerns. The exchange with the front bench was robust and engaging. And you made good use of the clarification time. Although some succumbed to the lure of using this space to make more speeches. Most members kept to the allotted time although some really stretched the limit. Some have also refined their speed reading techniques. My advice for next year is to plan your speech better. Brevity is not a sin. After all, the two most powerful words in the human vocabulary are very short: 'yes' and 'no'. I would also like to remind members to use audio-visual aids only as illustrations of some points in your speech, not to replace it as the public wants to hear you and not watch a video.

Some have also commiserated with me because I could not speak. Yes, indeed it was rather strange to be listening to you rather than to be with you, to argue my points or to explain policies, but I have enjoyed presiding over this debate. Let me conclude by thanking the Leader of the House and the Whip for their guidance and support, and ensuring a smooth debate.

I also thank my helpful and reliable Deputy Speakers, Mr Charles Chong and Mr Seah Kian Peng for their assistance. I'm also grateful to the staff of this House who worked tirelessly but quietly behind the scene to make everything run so smoothly that not many know the amount of work that they do. Once again, I thank Hon. Members for your active participation and for your cooperation in this debate. It is a pleasure to preside over a parliament where Hon Members take their work seriously and with great pride for the people that they represent. The people expect no less from us.

Thank you.
 
Madam Yacob should go to the British Parliament to learn the ropes. She speaks like she is still with the government party. Madam Yacob, the Speaker is neutral. Your job is to facilitate debate, not participate. You should have NO point of view on the issue being debated. Your job is to ensure the rules of parliamentary debate is followed to the tee.
 
This is the kind of motherhood speeches which anyone could have written even before the start of the proceedings.
 
Fucking wayang in a parody of demoncratik ackting.

PTUI!
 
The appointment of this unqualified macik to be the Speaker is a political decision: to mitigate the damage from the Michael Palmer scandal by placating women.

It also serves to keep the Malays (code word is 'ethnic minority') happy that one of their kind could make it big in Singapore. Racial politics 101.
 
My Indonesian maid can do a better job in Parliament than her. For a start, my Indonesian maid does not wear a tudung! Secondly, my maid is not Pro-PAP!
 
And she makes $550k on top of her MP allowance! That's why she is so happy to suck up to LHL.
 
She is a happy pappy and she is not a m&d la, she is a shit skin.
why bother about principles, equality, etc etc.
 
If she is really capable, Mdm Speaker would not have joined NTUC with her law degree. She would have joined A&G, Drew & Napier, Rajah and Tann, R & D etc. Same in the SPF. The ones around with law degrees are there because they CMI in the legal arena.
 
If she is really capable, Mdm Speaker would not have joined NTUC with her law degree. She would have joined A&G, Drew & Napier, Rajah and Tann, R & D etc. Same in the SPF. The ones around with law degrees are there because they CMI in the legal arena.

A career as a paralegal would be good too.

Lawyers need paralegals, just as doctors need nurses.
 
And she makes $550k on top of her MP allowance! That's why she is so happy to suck up to LHL.

She has another big monthly cheque from NTUC. I won't be surprised that she gets a few other pay cheques. Lim SS also gets big cheques as MP and Minister in PMO. He also gets giant pay cheque from NTUC.
 
And she makes $550k on top of her MP allowance! That's why she is so happy to suck up to LHL.

When Parliament is not in-session, I wonder what she's up to. 99.999% chobolan. On a per hr basis, must be one of the best paid job on this planet. It's like tiok beh pio every draw.

Palmer seepay suay. Lost a goldmine because of an abalone.
 
Beyond me and I sure many others as well how she ended up as the speaker of parliament. I wonder if others turned it down.
 
this is why PAP need military personals in parliament starting from BG LHL (since his father day as PM) onwards and buy top US military gears to deal with its own citizens their biggest threat. For the neighbours they can swallow Singapore in a week by blocking all air and sea routes.




You see, money buys loyalty.
Quite evident in Sinkie land on the top.
 
If she is really capable, Mdm Speaker would not have joined NTUC with her law degree. She would have joined A&G, Drew & Napier, Rajah and Tann, R & D etc. Same in the SPF. The ones around with law degrees are there because they CMI in the legal arena.


well said.
 
Palmer seepay suay. Lost a goldmine because of an abalone.


it is ok for palmer to lose only 1 goldmine. but this abalone is not those one can buy in a supermart.

this one is a pappy abalone
 
And she makes $550k on top of her MP allowance! That's why she is so happy to suck up to LHL.

She did not make that $550k on top of her MP allowance.

She is PAID that money.
Money which is not hers to being with, neither is the money LHL.

THAT IS OUR FUCKING MONEY THAT THEY STOLE FROM US UNDER THEIR GIMMICKS OF SUBSIDIES, DOING YOU ALL A FAVOUR, AFFORDABLE, LEVIES AND OTHER TRANSPARENT AND NOT SO TRANSPARENT SWINDLES ON US ALL.

AND PAID TO THEMSELVES, THEIR RUNNING DOGS AND FELLOW COCKROACHES IN WHITE
 
Compared to John Bercow, Speaker of the UK Parliament, Makcik Halimah is a featherweight. Not worth her oversized stipend from your taxpayers' money. Maybe makcik will have some clues after watching this video of Bercow's re-election as Speaker on 18th May 2010. The two key takeaways are: 1) the importance of impartiality; and 2) the Speaker's role as “champion of the backbenchers”.

@ 0:49 to 1:22 – John Bercow: “I would discharge my duties IMPARTIALY, not just between parties but between individual members. Above all, I would defend the rights of backbenchers to hold the government to account and to champion the causes dear to their hearts.”

@ 5:44 to 8:30 – The Right Honourable Member for Kensington, who has been in the House long enough to see six different Speakers summaries what in his view are the 3 essential requirements for a Speaker to have:

1) Be absolutely fair as between individual members;

2) Use his/her great power and authority in the House with flexibility and on occasion with humour to control the temperature; and

3) Act as the Champion of the Backbenchers against not just the Government front bench (i.e. Ministers) but also the Opposition front bench (i.e. Shadow Cabinet) as well.

Well, the Opposition in Singapore does not as yet have the numbers to form a Shadow Cabinet. It’s high time we elect more Opposition MPs to make that possible.

[video=youtube;Gi1mQyYsMis]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi1mQyYsMis[/video]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top