- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,589
- Points
- 48
The answer is a straight forward one.
If there is no funding , there is really a deficit.
So physically, the accounts show the previous TC was running a deficit when WP took over .
People are talking about the deficit, not the funding, right ? Whether WP TC receives the funding or not is another issue all together .
If let say, some persons claimed the TC was running a surplus of , let say, close to one million, then who is right who is wrong is very obvious when the accounts show otherwise , right ?
To common people, surplus before funding and surplus after funding is a different thing. right?
Bone of contention is the accounts show there was a physical deficit, right ?
And even with , let say, $300k funding and the surplus was roundabout $20K, where is another $ 980,000?
The people believe the WP is asking about this $980,000. right ?
If there is no funding , there is really a deficit.
So physically, the accounts show the previous TC was running a deficit when WP took over .
People are talking about the deficit, not the funding, right ? Whether WP TC receives the funding or not is another issue all together .
If let say, some persons claimed the TC was running a surplus of , let say, close to one million, then who is right who is wrong is very obvious when the accounts show otherwise , right ?
To common people, surplus before funding and surplus after funding is a different thing. right?
Bone of contention is the accounts show there was a physical deficit, right ?
And even with , let say, $300k funding and the surplus was roundabout $20K, where is another $ 980,000?
The people believe the WP is asking about this $980,000. right ?
Last edited: