Hola

[Leongsam]

If your host is a company headquartered, and also operating, outside Singapore, is a Singaporean court so powerful that it can get that foreign host to comply with its "order"?

The host company would not comply with a Singapore court order but it would have to comply to a court order initiated where they are located.

It all depends upon how much muscle the requestor has.

If it is an individual with limited resources using Ravi as his lawyer working pro bono, nothing would happen.

However a billionaire or a government with endless resources at their disposal could make things happen.

Take for example the case of Kim Dotcom who thought he was safe in NZ. The Hollywood bigwigs who are after him for piracy have enough influence to get the NZ government to raid his servers and initiate extradition proceedings.

 

[da dick]

Take for example the case of Kim Dotcom who thought he was safe in NZ. The Hollywood bigwigs who are after him for piracy have enough influence to get the NZ government to raid his servers and initiate extradition proceedings.

maybe you should move to sweden or russia if you're that scared, towkay leong

 

[Leongsam]

maybe you should move to sweden or russia if you're that scared, towkay leong

I'm not doing anything wrong so why should I worry? Besides I'm pro PAPPY so that gives me considerably immunity.

 

[takashi]

Take for example the case of Kim Dotcom who thought he was safe in NZ. The Hollywood bigwigs who are after him for piracy have enough influence to get the NZ government to raid his servers and initiate extradition proceedings.

Let's hope for the best!

But I now have a feeling that the PAP government might be allowing both this and the sex forum to continue running, so as to make it EASY for them to continue SPYING on the members here, rather than have to go through the trouble of blocking this website and then hunting for new mirror sites created by you....

 

[takashi]

I'm not doing anything wrong so why should I worry? Besides I'm pro PAPPY so that gives me considerably immunity.

Argh! I was hoping for a typo, so that I could say that this reminds me of the following song by Donny Osmond:

[video=youtube;JMrcnqKSbw8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMrcnqKSbw8[/video]

But I've posted it anyway! :o:p

 

[takashi]

Another one:

[video=youtube;zI2hgm65WhE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI2hgm65WhE[/video]

 

[Hans168]

What the events over the last few days have shown is that the aggrieved party doesn't have to be the complainant. It can be anyone who is distressed as the result of the criticism.
.

The fact that it costs $300 to file an injunction means the rich and the powerful immediately have the upper hand. The more money you have, the more critics you can silence.

The legislation is ridiculous and I will take all measures to ensure that nobody in this forum gets in trouble. I may be an ardent fan of the PAP but I strongly believe that everyone has a right to say their piece. The person on the receiving has every right to reply accordingly.

dat is very broad interpretation of the Protection,,,,Act!

 

[Leongsam]

dat is very broad interpretation of the Protection,,,,Act!

That's exactly my point. It can be interpreted to suit the government.

 

[xpo2015]

Hola is dangerous. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't just have to be careful and always write the truth to your own knowledge.