Chitchat Ho Ching dishing out new advice!

1. Mdm Ho is right in declaring that modern Singapore began in 1819 under Sir Stamford Raffles. She did not deny the existence of this red dot on the map that existed since planet Earth began. The keyword is 'MODERN'


2. During the 11th century or even far back ANCIENT times, when Human population was small, many more adventurous sought to stake out claims on little inhabited land masses. However, the realities are that one or a society can only defend what one owns or wants. Failure to do so would ensure others whom have better talents and might will just take over.


3. In such times, the existing powerful nations were sea-faring, such as Spain, France, England and even China, seeking for RICHES and Dominance of other landmasses. By the 18th century, England - a small island nation - ruled the World, thru its religion, talents, might and democratic system of Rule of Laws, and reaped wealth far far beyond their means from the lush fertile valleys of Asia.


4. If it had not been England, it would had been Spain or France that would rule Asia, and worse, leave no system of Rule of Law, infrastructure, security, etc, etc and critically a common trade lingo used Worldwide unlike the Brits that left a legacy for the World, including even USA.

We Singaporeans may had ended up speaking French, like the Vietnamese whom had been horrifically exploited by France and abandoned after WW2.


5.
Our ancient and colonial past will never be denied, as there are good and bad with such systems, and can never be hidden or re-written as based upon ancient records, archeological studies and even physical evidences such as the Hindu SriVijaya empire that ruled Indonesia from Palembang since 7th Century and empire remnants left in Bali, or the lives of the Han Chinese Ming Dynasty descendants in Malaysia.

ULTIMATELY, Singapore IS an INDEPENDENT Nation now, and we TAKE CONTROL over our own DEMOCRATIC destiny, and NOT upon the fate that other nations sought to determine for us.


.

Can dig more at Fort Canning…British demolished a lot ancient relic in SG to facilitate the fishing village fairy tales

Many forgotten Raffles did not field work when he work at Indon prior to his expedition to find SG…how this AMDK Clerk convince his bosses to spend millions in today to fund his expedition if Raffles did not produce any solid evidence?
 
Last edited:
The early 17th century Malay literary work Sejarah Melayu (Malay Annals) records that Kota Gelanggi lies on the upper reaches of the Johor River with a main fort made of black stone (or Kota Batu Hitam in Malay). "Kota Gelanggi" may derive from the Malay mispronunciation of the Thai word Ghlong-Keow or "Box of Emeralds", hence in Malay, Perbendaharaan Permata (Treasury of Jewels). Ancient Tamil inscriptions state that a city was raided in 1025 by South Indian Chola Dynasty conqueror Rajendra Chola Iafter he had destroyed the Malay Kingdom of Gangga Negara. The latter is generally equated with the ruins and ancient tombs that can still be seen in Beruas district in the state of Perak. Old European maps of the Malay Peninsula show the location of a city known as Polepi at the southern tip of the Malay Peninsula.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kota_Gelanggi#cite_note-6"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a>

1751599757107.jpeg


Speculation on the Johor site was published in a 2004 paper entitled The "Lost City" of Kota Gelanggiby Raimy Che-Ross, an independent researcher.

The paper received wide coverage in the Malaysian media. In 2006, Khalid Syed Ali, Curator of Archaeology in the Department's Research and Development Division, said a team of government appointed researchers had carried out a month-long 'study' in July 2005 but found no trace of the "Lost City".<a Khalid later added that the department does not categorically deny that it exists, only that research carried out until now had not found any evidence of its existence.

Three elder Orang Asli headmen from the Linggiu Dam area nonetheless insist that the city exists; according to Tuk Batin Abdul Rahman (85), "the city is very large, I have seen it myself because it was located near my village. I estimate its fort to be approximately forty feet square, with three holes like windows along its walls", adding that the area was formerly his home and that of fifty other Orang Asli families, before they were moved out by the British due to the Communist threat in the late 1940s–50s.

He further said that he had first stumbled across the fort in the 1930s, while foraging for jungle produce. Tuk Batin Abdul Rahman's statements were independently verified by Tuk Batin Daud, 60 and Tuk Batin Adong, 58, who added that their people had visited the site on numerous previous occasions and had seen the black stone walls themselves.
1751599871347.jpeg
 
Fishing village can afford to build walled structures in ulu forest deep in Johor Jungle??
 
ohhh no, is her retirement going to be commenting on different topics? you mean we have to put up with hearing her (I don't have to listen) for more years?
 
if she were to give all her ill-gotten gains and past multimillion dollar salaries and bonuses to her former colonial master the brits, i would believe her bs.
 
Back
Top